273 Comments
User's avatar
Timothy M Dwyer's avatar

I highly recommend Rachel Maddow’s “Blowout” (Crown Publishing 2019) for an in depth look at the incredible damage the oil industry has done to the poor countries that it has, “convinced”, generally through bribery of public officials, to welcome them into their poor countries with the promise of untold wealth (for the countries leaders) and increased poverty and misery for the remainder of the populace. Ms. Maddow takes an in-depth look at a half dozen poor countries that accepted the promise of untold wealth for the general population and received abject misery, pollution and graft instead. Her review actually uncovered the fact that for these poor countries, the arrival of “drill baby drill” actually left them poorer than they were before the discoveries of ‘Black Gold’ within their respective borders.

Expand full comment
Megan Macomber's avatar

I understand that the sun spends, like, a lot of time in Africa. I've seen photos--nature documentaries even. Plenty of sun there! Why not use all that sun? I bet it could run a washing machine or two.

Expand full comment
Zyxomma's avatar

Ta, Dok. I'm a day late so it's probable no one will see this. I have an award-winning documentary filmmaker friend from Kerala. He's the one who told me about Modi putting up power transmission lines where there is NO source of electricity.

Expand full comment
Vic's avatar

Rex Tillerson didn't want fracking near his home in Tejas, either.

Such hypocrites.

Expand full comment
Bupkus231's avatar

I'm kinda reminded of how fast cell phone technology was adopted in many third-world countries - where providing the infrastructure for land line phones would have been prohibitively expensive. One would think that the same would occur with distributed energy systems as this sentence:

"... Wind, solar, and storage are in fact becoming more affordable, and capable of bringing energy to more people, more quickly, in more places, than fossil fuels, making it possible for developing nations to leapfrog past the obsolete technology of coal, gas, and oil...."

Expand full comment
Doktor Zoom's avatar

Yes! That's precisely the analogy that clean energy advocates are using, and that is already being embraced in many ways.

Expand full comment
Erisian's avatar

"We all knew that the second Trump administration would be a disastrous setback for the fight against climate change, given his pledge to leave the Paris climate agreement again and roll back as much of Joe Biden’s climate accomplishments as he possibly can."

* Climate change? What climate change? All that's been happening is just a few minor heat and cold waves around the world. For example, the US has seen an increase in the number and strength of hurricanes of late, but that is not due to the climate; the root cause is Jews in the government creating and directing them to punish the South for being antisemitic;

* Why should the US continue to be part of the Paris agreement? Most of the signatories are doing the same as most NATO countries: making America pay for the other, deadbeat, countries that aren't pulling their own weight financially;

* Pres Biden's efforts have to be countermanded in order for the US to be the largest exporter of energy worldwide... fossil fuels are the future, baby. Besides, clean energy is for suckers and losers who can't afford the gas to fill the tank in their gas-guzzling oversized pickup trucks and SUVs that seat at least eight comfortably -- the vehicle of choice for Soccer moms and dads.

-----

"insisting against all the evidence that the climate effects of burning fossil fuels are still a long way off, so in the meantime we should keep using them, because fossil fuels bring prosperity to everyone"

How dare you question one of the expert advisors that the Fulvous Flatulence wants around him! I mean, who should we believe: an individual fully steeped in the benefits of pollution and whack weather via the burning fossil fuels or some climate science nerd who's never been near an oil rig?

-----

“not an intellectually serious argument. […] It’s about creating a permission structure for not pursuing a more responsible energy policy.”

"[I]ntellectually serious argument[s]" are anathema to the whining little insects circling the dim light that is the Pumpkin Pestilence. In fact, anything intellectual is, by definition, to be avoided at all costs, Poindexter; Brainiacs are worthless in real world situations.

-----

"rooftop solar panels, small-scale wind turbines and home battery storage systems could create 25 million jobs by the end of the decade in Asia and Africa"

A primary idea within the MAGA (bowel) movement is to bring as many job opportunities as possible to America, and screw the other countries, *especially* African and Asian countries. After all, a majority of shithole countries are on one of these two continents.

-----

"the fact that building great big fossil fuel plants in poor nations primarily benefits the fossil fuel companies, and often the corrupt governments that invite them in"

Yes, but think of all the temporary construction jobs building these facilities will bring, and the revenue that will flow into the US:

"ExxonMobil and Chevron, two companies headquartered in the United States, reported earnings of $55.7 billion and $35.5 billion, respectively, during 2022." https://blog.ucsusa.org/shaina-sadai/fossil-fuel-companies-make-billions-in-profit-as-we-suffer-billions-in-losses/

And in return:

"In 2022, the United States experienced 18 separate climate and weather related disasters, including droughts, floods, severe storms, and wildfires which each caused over $1 billion in damage and led to the deaths of four hundred and seventy four people. Altogether the 18 events cost an estimated $165 billion" ibid

-----

"Nigeria’s energy grid is so shoddy that fewer than a third of rural residents have access to electricity. Even in cities, the grid is prone to shortages and failures from its rickety infrastructure"

IOW, Nigeria is Africa's Texas.

-----

"pro-industry rightwing hacks have distorted science in the name of profits ever since the early 20th Century"

This may have been occurring for over 100 years now, but the Sociopathic Marigold Swamp Monster, his minions, sycophants, lackeys, proxies, and turd polishers have made twisting science to fit their narrative into a science unto itself.

fnord

Expand full comment
Lurky of the Manwolfs's avatar

OT, new to substack, is the app the only way to stay signed into this thingamajig?

Expand full comment
Doktor Zoom's avatar

Don't think so, once you sign in with a browser, you should stay signed in. That said, I mostly use a desktop computer so I can't really speak to what happens with mobile devices.

Expand full comment
Satanic Pancake's avatar

Another writer in the pocket of Big Watt.

Expand full comment
SkeptiKC's avatar

I have enormous admiration and respect for Jennifer Granholm. She is one of those rare but wonderful individuals who fights back with facts and keep you from giving up and giving in.

Expand full comment
Ellie Alive In 25's avatar

When the oil guys drink a glass of water that they can first light with a match, I might be interested.

If windmills and wind farms are so terrible, why does blood red Texas have so many of them?

Expand full comment
DavidGC's avatar

Well, I believe I did hear that fracking improves the flushing of toilets and this came from an authority on just about everything.

Expand full comment
Shocktreatment's avatar

That's that then! Early quit?

Expand full comment
Land Shark 🇺🇦 🏳️‍⚧️'s avatar

Let happy hour begin!

Expand full comment
Trux Mint In Box's avatar

Mr. Wright said on the “Mission Zero” podcast last year. “We don’t want that to happen. And we simply don’t have meaningful substitutes for oil, gas and coal today.”

Didn’t I read that some Scandinavian countries are 100 percent renewable energy now?

Expand full comment
Doktor Zoom's avatar

Norway is almost entirely hydro, though oil is its main export, so there's that.

Expand full comment
GiggleSnort's avatar

Prince Andrew's been associated with a man now barred from the U.K. on suspicion of being a Chinese spy. He was discussing some kind of business arrangement with the prince (https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/dec/13/from-prince-to-pariah-andrews-never-ending-fall-from-grace). Not a good look. It's bad enough the royals are basically useless, but if they're selling influence or spilling any state secrets to Commie spies, that does actual damage.

Expand full comment
VwllssWndr's avatar

Fuck off, limey aristos! Traitoring is OUR THING.

Expand full comment
Shocktreatment's avatar

The things that Prince Andrew's been associated with!

Security clearances, state secrets, people credibly accused, blackmail...

Expand full comment
[Redacted]'s avatar

Before the royals became useless, they were dangerous. They were like Trump. They operated the kingdom, and the empire, for their own benefit.

Expand full comment
Daniel's avatar

This is just slander to try and drag the paedophile Prince's name through the mud.

Expand full comment
PhoenixDogLover's avatar

Kink shaming plus chink shaming.

Expand full comment
Parakeetist's avatar

OT:

It's official: ravens like tater tots

The wild story of the Anchorage White Raven

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anchorage_White_Raven

Expand full comment
Doktor Zoom's avatar

NaCrowleon Dynamite.

Expand full comment
Fifth Dentist's avatar

I see crows feasting on fresh roadkill along my commute to work.

The crow family seems to have a varied diet, but they're smart enough to find the easiest route to feeding so they can get home to do math equations.

Expand full comment
Daniel's avatar

They still haven't satisfactorily explained their similarity to writing desks though.

Expand full comment
Hops: 86/47 or bust's avatar

That unanswered question has nagged me for years.

Expand full comment
BillEGoatSmile's avatar

(From paywalled Boston Globe)

"Massachusetts regulators have given a green light to developers planning a giant battery farm in Everett over objections from the city’s mayor, who prefers a more vibrant development on the 20 acres where the project would go.

On Nov. 29, state energy and environmental affairs secretary Rebecca Tepper signed a final record of decision allowing the massive battery energy storage system — potentially the largest in New England — proposed by Texas-based Jupiter Power to advance in permitting. The project, known as the Trimount Energy Storage Facility, will now be reviewed by the state Department of Public Utilities, which can allow energy projects to bypass local site-plan reviews.

Environmental groups have praised the idea of turning this polluted land, formerly an ExxonMobil oil tank farm, into a lithium-ion battery farm that could deliver as much as 700 megawatts of power — roughly the equivalent of a typical nuclear reactor — during times of peak demand. The Trimount project represents the first phase of a broader redevelopment of the former tank farm, which once stretched from Route 16 all the way to the Mystic River, spanning nearly 100 acres. A joint venture of Davis Companies and Global Partners is cleaning up the site and drafting preliminary plans for a sprawling mixed-use complex that could result in as many as 3,000 housing units and millions of square feet of new commercial space."

Expand full comment
Richard S's avatar

Can the battery storage units be put underground, with the development (scaled back as needed) on top of it?

Expand full comment
Parakeetist's avatar

I like electric electricities which do not put bad stuff in the air. Birb live in air. Well, thees birb live in nest in house. But I like clean power.

Expand full comment
Let me sum up's avatar

Huh. I'm starting to get a sinking feeling about 2025. Things definitely have a Friday afternoon news dump vibe already.

Expand full comment
Doktor Zoom's avatar

Watch the Chris Hayes segment; it really buoyed me last night

Expand full comment
Gary Seven in Space's avatar

Friday the Thirteenth, too...

Expand full comment