Discussion about this post

User's avatar
pstokk's avatar

Regarding point three, some back of the napkin calculations:Let's say there are 300 million quite affluent people in the world. 75 in each of the US, EU, other rich world countries, middle income countries.100 USD from each yields 30 billion.That's getting more into the range of things that might make it possible to buy up the Amazon. Or Indonesia. Or the central African forests.New technologies, transition to new systems, a combination of market forces and government mandates/investments will take care of all that. But preserving something like the Amazon, in a decade perspective, only private initiatives can save it in time.Think about it.

Expand full comment
GaseousAnomaly's avatar

“The higher priority would be to take care of our own resources first, or better yet, save taxpayers the pain of ever watching President Biden splash American treasure around the globe to chase his environmental agenda.”

Don't send money abroad that could be better spent further enriching the already rich in America.

Got it.

Expand full comment
530 more comments...

No posts