You want a platform you can control make your own. Oh right, every time you try it falls to pieces because it's not profitable. It's almost like companies get to make decisions based on money instead of loyalty to you for slashing all the regulations.
I just call "Libertarianism" the 'philosophy' of choice for anal retentives desperately trying to rationalize their immaturity and anti-social behavior.
I am wondering: are Libertarians like Paul actually against slavery? On the one hand, they claim to be all for individual freedom. On the other hand, it is clear the John Galts of the world get more freedom than the less productive plebes. And they're against minimum wage laws and stuff. So what about a wage of zero? Isn't that what slavery is? Paul is outraged because he, a doctor and a Senator, might have his labor demanded by someone else. But he is outraged because he is on the receiving end of that. These Libertarian types always assume they will be on top and other peoples' labor will be theirs for the asking, if not the taking.
Glibertarians in America are basically neo-feudalist scum. They deserve no quarter whatsoever. They want to destroy the state that gets in their way of their making the lives of others miserable.
Caveat Eyeballs.
I am so sorry.
It's a really stop by anytime and pick up whatever you need "porch/closet".
You want a platform you can control make your own. Oh right, every time you try it falls to pieces because it's not profitable. It's almost like companies get to make decisions based on money instead of loyalty to you for slashing all the regulations.
Oh no, it'll be a hilarious clusterfuck and implode spectacularly, but not before all the absolutely terrible people out themselves.
I propose a constitutional amendment that nothing Ayn Rand's Teats Suckle Me In My Dreams Paul ever says can be published anywhere, forever, the end.
"Paul is welcome to start his own video-sharing website"-Much like how he started his own medical accreditation board.
They never seem to get it with regards to businesses and rights and all that.
All it takes is for one decision against them to make them turn on principles they supported before.
Shows us all where their true priorities lie (me me ME!).
I just call "Libertarianism" the 'philosophy' of choice for anal retentives desperately trying to rationalize their immaturity and anti-social behavior.
And remember who Daddy Dearest is.
I am wondering: are Libertarians like Paul actually against slavery? On the one hand, they claim to be all for individual freedom. On the other hand, it is clear the John Galts of the world get more freedom than the less productive plebes. And they're against minimum wage laws and stuff. So what about a wage of zero? Isn't that what slavery is? Paul is outraged because he, a doctor and a Senator, might have his labor demanded by someone else. But he is outraged because he is on the receiving end of that. These Libertarian types always assume they will be on top and other peoples' labor will be theirs for the asking, if not the taking.
Maybe he should notice he is a US Senator and by definition a SERVANT of the people. If he is unhappy about that he could retire tomorrow.
Rand designed it to last three hours.
Glibertarians in America are basically neo-feudalist scum. They deserve no quarter whatsoever. They want to destroy the state that gets in their way of their making the lives of others miserable.
And took a huge shit on their oaths of office in doing so?
Because it would show him bravely getting his ass kicked. In the Sir Robin tradition.