For the first time since FDR used his polio-ridden legs to kick the Germans and Japanese in their fascist asses (the Italians, too, but nobody really cares about them when we talk World War II), Democrats have an advantage on foreign policy. This is problematic for the Romney campaign, because a Democrat is in office, and they are Republicans, and they would like to not talk about foreign policy at all.
Geeze, <a href="http:\/\/www.theamericanconservative...\/larison\/" target="_blank">Daniel Larrison</a> at <i>The American Conservative</i> has been whacking Romney&#039;s &quot;foreign policy expertise&quot; like it&#039;s a pi&ntilde;ata, <a href="http:\/\/www.tnr.com\/article\/magazine\/politics\/106493\/romney-foreign-policy-american-century-imperialism\?utm_source=The New Republic&amp\;utm_campaign=e7c66653ab-TNR_Daily_091112&amp\;utm_medium=email" target="_blank">John Judis</a> at TNR did it today, Chait and a host of others likewise. The guy has weird, neo-con views that are strange to the rest of the country, but accepted inside the beltway as some sort of received wisdom.
<i>given his experience heading the Olympic Winter Games </i>
If that&#039;s the case, the guy who runs the line and puts you in the little cars at &quot;It&#039;s a Small World&quot; should at least be our UN Ambassador.
<i>And, he cautioned not to underestimate Romney&rsquo;s foreign policy credentials.</i>
here they are:
1. pissing off britain 2. pissing off palestinians and embarrassing israel 3. acting like a fool in poland 4. not convincing french people to give up wine 5. promising to bomb iran
An Amish drive-by apparently consists of thrown tomatos. (Tomatoes? Who knows?)
You know, I think you may be right about that, sounds plausible, but can you point to any corroboration? That would be nice.
Geeze, <a href="http:\/\/www.theamericanconservative...\/larison\/" target="_blank">Daniel Larrison</a> at <i>The American Conservative</i> has been whacking Romney&#039;s &quot;foreign policy expertise&quot; like it&#039;s a pi&ntilde;ata, <a href="http:\/\/www.tnr.com\/article\/magazine\/politics\/106493\/romney-foreign-policy-american-century-imperialism\?utm_source=The New Republic&amp\;utm_campaign=e7c66653ab-TNR_Daily_091112&amp\;utm_medium=email" target="_blank">John Judis</a> at TNR did it today, Chait and a host of others likewise. The guy has weird, neo-con views that are strange to the rest of the country, but accepted inside the beltway as some sort of received wisdom.
And so much fucking going on there among the steroid-fueled over-privileged Youngs. That had to make Mitt uncomfortable.
And this varies from Republican SOPs in what way?
<i>given his experience heading the Olympic Winter Games </i>
If that&#039;s the case, the guy who runs the line and puts you in the little cars at &quot;It&#039;s a Small World&quot; should at least be our UN Ambassador.
<i>And, he cautioned not to underestimate Romney&rsquo;s foreign policy credentials.</i>
here they are:
1. pissing off britain 2. pissing off palestinians and embarrassing israel 3. acting like a fool in poland 4. not convincing french people to give up wine 5. promising to bomb iran
actually john kerry can run circles around mittbot&#039;s foreign policy credentials and would make a reasonable sec of state.
What Romney knows how to say in French:
<i>N&#039;aimeriez-vous pas &agrave; arr&ecirc;ter de fumer et boire du caf&eacute; et du vin?</i>