25 Comments
User's avatar
bobbert's avatar

As an atheist, I say goddam right.

bobbert's avatar

<i>Remembrance of Lost Twinkies.</i>

Actually, as a 66-yo, I'd like to remark that Twinkies have always been disgusting.

bobbert's avatar

You have that part right.

bobbert's avatar

Of course you do.

You probably think the Readers' Digest believes that.

bobbert's avatar

I've been waiting for another Drinky Thing, so maybe Hell.

bobbert's avatar

No, that's Santa.

bobbert's avatar

I don't think the Church of Satan actually <i>worships</i> Satan, except maybe technically.

EmmettGrogan's avatar

It depends. There are many different Satanist sects and they beieve in different things. My understanding is that most do not actually worship Satan. Ignorance is considered a "sin" by many of them.

diogenez's avatar

"[Satanic Temple] spokesperson, Lucien Greaves"

Ruth Gordon should be their spokesperson.

𝔅𝔢𝔢𝔩𝔷𝔢𝔟𝔲𝔟𝔟𝔞's avatar

He's a master at substituting cynical rationalization for actual legal thinking.

Zippy W. Pinhead's avatar

Precedents? We don't need no stinkin precedents!

Zippy W. Pinhead's avatar

you know what they say- all those blah robed people look alike

Zippy W. Pinhead's avatar

those idjits were voting for dopey Tea Baggers either way

Zippy W. Pinhead's avatar

<i>What’s good for the fat Satanic goose is good for the fat, Roman Catholic gander, right Justice Scalia?</i>

Nothing like having your shitty decision shoved down your throat, eh Scalia (and Alito, the author)?

a bit of legal foie gras, as it were

Gherkins d'Resistance's avatar

Satan getting involved? I can't wait for the hearing where they cause the Founders' Ghosts to manifest and start shitting all over the Supreme Court with ectoplasmic ghost-poops.

Slimer with a Ben Franklin face would be so awesome, shatting originalist green glop all over Alito and Silent Thomas.