15 Comments

And by coincidence Clarence Thomas has a book on the same subject coming out at the same time. And -- SURPRISE -- Thomas completely agrees with Scalia. He even uses the same words.

Expand full comment

Jenny McCarthy ?

Expand full comment

<blockquote>if a nigger wants it, then it ain't constitutional.</blockquote>

Ah yes, the White Supremacy Clause.

Expand full comment

Neither. Scalia's actively harmful, not just ugly.

Expand full comment

It's worse than that; the rape of a 223 year old.

Expand full comment

Well, the thing he considers to be of utmost merit is whatever result he wanted in the first place.

Expand full comment

I wish him no physical harm, but when I look at Scalia I do think "Surely this man cannot live forever."

Expand full comment

<blockquote>his newfound hatred of Federal power.</blockquote>

Gee, I wonder if that had anything to do with the increase in Presidential melanin content between <em>Gonzales v Raich</em> and now...

Expand full comment

I say both

Expand full comment

It will just seem like forever.

Expand full comment

Mein Kampf? Bad example.

Expand full comment

He took the words right out of Clarence Thomas' mouth.

Expand full comment

This is great news. My breakfast sausage didn't have the same flavor without human thumbs.

Expand full comment

Which clause covers hoverounds?

Expand full comment

Bye Bye Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Expand full comment