15 Comments
User's avatar
JustPixelz: IV%'er's avatar

And by coincidence Clarence Thomas has a book on the same subject coming out at the same time. And -- SURPRISE -- Thomas completely agrees with Scalia. He even uses the same words.

Expand full comment
Chris Grrr's avatar

Jenny McCarthy ?

Expand full comment
SullivanSt's avatar

<blockquote>if a nigger wants it, then it ain't constitutional.</blockquote>

Ah yes, the White Supremacy Clause.

Expand full comment
SullivanSt's avatar

Neither. Scalia's actively harmful, not just ugly.

Expand full comment
schmannity's avatar

It's worse than that; the rape of a 223 year old.

Expand full comment
SullivanSt's avatar

Well, the thing he considers to be of utmost merit is whatever result he wanted in the first place.

Expand full comment
BarackMyWorld's avatar

I wish him no physical harm, but when I look at Scalia I do think "Surely this man cannot live forever."

Expand full comment
SullivanSt's avatar

<blockquote>his newfound hatred of Federal power.</blockquote>

Gee, I wonder if that had anything to do with the increase in Presidential melanin content between <em>Gonzales v Raich</em> and now...

Expand full comment
Dashboard Buddha's avatar

I say both

Expand full comment
Dashboard Buddha's avatar

It will just seem like forever.

Expand full comment
schmannity's avatar

Mein Kampf? Bad example.

Expand full comment
schmannity's avatar

He took the words right out of Clarence Thomas' mouth.

Expand full comment
schmannity's avatar

This is great news. My breakfast sausage didn't have the same flavor without human thumbs.

Expand full comment
schmannity's avatar

Which clause covers hoverounds?

Expand full comment
schmannity's avatar

Bye Bye Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Expand full comment