Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Crip Dyke's avatar

Although it's more likely to hurt women than men, I still begin with skepticism bordering on antagonism in evaluating a candidate for high office whose only claim to political experience or high office is being married to or the child of someone else who got elected to something important & powerful.

Hillary Clinton won me over, though not quickly enough that I would have likely voted for her in her first primary. The ease with which a person in high office can install relatives (and to a lesser degree close friends) in other high offices is a direct measure of how democratic a jurisdiction is, and I would rather lose a few good candidates in order to prevent corruption and preserve democratic freedom.

This incident highlights the danger, and if Magee was in contact with the campaign then it speaks to the sense of entitlement to high office of Murphy herself.

We never want any elected official or prominent candidate to feel entitled to the office. We always want candidates and officeholders to feel indebted to the voters. It's bad enough already with our campaign finance system that creates powerful people who feel more grateful for dollars than for votes. Adding nepotism to that mix is decidedly bad news.

Regardless of policies, there is simply no way that Tammy Murphy could get my vote if I lived in NJ. Overcoming democracy's inherent conflict with nepotism and entitlement requires clearing a high bar, and Murphy isn't remotely close.

Expand full comment
Frank Talk, Action Pundit!'s avatar

So, unlike Republicans, Democrats aren't craven cowards, don't knuckle under to threats, and steadfastly do what's best for the People. OK, got it!

Expand full comment
233 more comments...

No posts