It&#039;s <i>almost</i> as if the GOP simply grabbed onto some issue with both fists solely for the political boosts that it would give!
Just because all of their other planks don&#039;t seem to really be all that compatible with &#039;every babby, no exceptions&#039; doesn&#039;t mean they can&#039;t exploit voters who make their decisions based on a single issue. Because duh, single issue!
You can tell those voters anything, even if it isn&#039;t true! What could be more perfect?
I like the part where &quot;she may be using her abortions as a way to gain political favor with Democratic voters.&quot; Aha! So <i>that&#039;s</i> why Kerry lost in &#039;04!
Is this the same Cheryl Sullenger who spent two years in prison for conspiring to blow up a clinic? Looks like it. It&#039;s heartening that the NRO believes in helping the rehabilitation of ex-cons by giving them a platform.
&ldquo;It would be disturbing to think that she may be using her abortions as a way to gain political favor with Democratic voters,&rdquo; Sullenger added.
Yes, it would certainly be disturbing if anybody was enough of a pig-ignorant douchebag to think <i>that.</i> Good thing it hasn&#039;t occurred to anybody -- right, Cheryl?
So sorry. I&#039;ve known a couple of people who have had ectopic pregnancies and they were awful, especially since the baby was wanted. What the &quot;senior policy analyst&quot; left off is that tubal pregnancies are never viable for the fetus and untreated, have a serious mortality rate for the mother.
It would be <strike>distrubing</strike> <strike>surprising</strike> <strike>revolting</strike> entirely predictable that Republicans would use Davis&#039; abortions for political purposes.
&quot;We simply do not know the circumstances of [insert bullshit story you want your knuckledragging followers to believe.]&quot;
That Faux News slander technique never gets old, does it?
On the bright side, I&#039;m guessing that Sullenger is <a href="https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch\?v=MOgYypO-_mc" target="_blank">not likely to become a Faux Newsbabe. </a>
Babies are supposed to be born to rich white parents... who are selfish enough to vote Republican.
&quot;Associates&quot; have misdemeanor convictions. &quot;Team Members&quot; are rap-sheet virgins.
Sometimes, when a 1 and a 0 love each other VERY much...
It&#039;s <i>almost</i> as if the GOP simply grabbed onto some issue with both fists solely for the political boosts that it would give!
Just because all of their other planks don&#039;t seem to really be all that compatible with &#039;every babby, no exceptions&#039; doesn&#039;t mean they can&#039;t exploit voters who make their decisions based on a single issue. Because duh, single issue!
You can tell those voters anything, even if it isn&#039;t true! What could be more perfect?
..and we thought it was Republican MEN who didn&#039;t know shit about female biology.
Once wasn&#039;t enuff for you, huh? Best wishes.
I like the part where &quot;she may be using her abortions as a way to gain political favor with Democratic voters.&quot; Aha! So <i>that&#039;s</i> why Kerry lost in &#039;04!
So a boob talks like a rube about a tube. Some fun.
Is this the same Cheryl Sullenger who spent two years in prison for conspiring to blow up a clinic? Looks like it. It&#039;s heartening that the NRO believes in helping the rehabilitation of ex-cons by giving them a platform.
&ldquo;It would be disturbing to think that she may be using her abortions as a way to gain political favor with Democratic voters,&rdquo; Sullenger added.
Yes, it would certainly be disturbing if anybody was enough of a pig-ignorant douchebag to think <i>that.</i> Good thing it hasn&#039;t occurred to anybody -- right, Cheryl?
So sorry. I&#039;ve known a couple of people who have had ectopic pregnancies and they were awful, especially since the baby was wanted. What the &quot;senior policy analyst&quot; left off is that tubal pregnancies are never viable for the fetus and untreated, have a serious mortality rate for the mother.
That&#039;s a situation that can get very weird indeed: <a href="http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Lithopedion" target="_blank">" rel="nofollow noopener" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithopedion">http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
On the bright side, lithopedion is a killer Scrabble word.
It would be <strike>distrubing</strike> <strike>surprising</strike> <strike>revolting</strike> entirely predictable that Republicans would use Davis&#039; abortions for political purposes.
&quot;We simply do not know the circumstances of [insert bullshit story you want your knuckledragging followers to believe.]&quot;
That Faux News slander technique never gets old, does it?
On the bright side, I&#039;m guessing that Sullenger is <a href="https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch\?v=MOgYypO-_mc" target="_blank">not likely to become a Faux Newsbabe. </a>
You don&#039;t get any more pro-life than that.
That 10-pound tumor on the top of Cheryl Sullenger&#039;s neck is becoming even more disturbing. Not quite sentient, but disturbing nonetheless.