The Supreme Court is planning to hear arguments at the end of April in Buttsechs v. Phyllis Schlafly (not what it's really called), the case they will most likely use to permanently cram gay marriage into the throats and bottoms of all the American people. This means that everyone and their wingnut uncle is submitting an
Oh, I doubt he would actually have to *buy* it, it will be presented to him all written up nice and tidy and "legal-looking", and he will just gladly accept it as a gift being offered. Then he will re-sell it.
You drove through intentionally?
"You're stuck in the 19th century" has just changed from a fatuous insult into an actual Supreme Court legal argument
five out of nine didn't get parchment . . . they got stacks of $100s . . . i await the vote to see if the stacks were too short.
"Shows what you know."- Fat Tony
Really...
I think they never stopped.
A woman of color, at that. Unfortunately one who attended the Michelle Malkin School of Wingnuttery, however.
Can't we just be married 3/5ths of the time? That way we can spend the other 2/5ths of the time having better sex than straight couples.
Gay-hating gays too. Worker-hating workers, minority-hating minorities, I could go on.
Sooner or later they'll get around to banning sideboob, and that will be the end of them.
Well now that's cleared up!
"We are just using it as a legal argument - it doesn't *mean* anything!"
Well, it is enshrined. You can't touch that.
Well I take out the garbage so it's not me!
Oh, I doubt he would actually have to *buy* it, it will be presented to him all written up nice and tidy and "legal-looking", and he will just gladly accept it as a gift being offered. Then he will re-sell it.
Don't forget that SC is also the state that gave us the guy who was arrested for fucking a horse.Twice. http://www.huffingtonpost.c...