63 Comments
User's avatar
Joseph's avatar

You drove through intentionally?

Naked Bunny with a Whip's avatar

"You're stuck in the 19th century" has just changed from a fatuous insult into an actual Supreme Court legal argument

willi0000000's avatar

five out of nine didn't get parchment . . . they got stacks of $100s . . . i await the vote to see if the stacks were too short.

willi0000000's avatar

"Shows what you know."- Fat Tony

JustPixelz: IV%'er's avatar

I think they never stopped.

PDX Realness's avatar

A woman of color, at that. Unfortunately one who attended the Michelle Malkin School of Wingnuttery, however.

PDX Realness's avatar

Can't we just be married 3/5ths of the time? That way we can spend the other 2/5ths of the time having better sex than straight couples.

Paperless Tiger's avatar

Gay-hating gays too. Worker-hating workers, minority-hating minorities, I could go on.

Paperless Tiger's avatar

Sooner or later they'll get around to banning sideboob, and that will be the end of them.

a_pink_poodle's avatar

Well now that's cleared up!

Darnyoudarnyoutoheck🧡🧡🧡's avatar

"We are just using it as a legal argument - it doesn't *mean* anything!"

yourlizardoverlord's avatar

Well, it is enshrined. You can't touch that.

teddy21's avatar

Well I take out the garbage so it's not me!

BackDoorMan's avatar

Oh, I doubt he would actually have to *buy* it, it will be presented to him all written up nice and tidy and "legal-looking", and he will just gladly accept it as a gift being offered. Then he will re-sell it.

Spurning Beer's avatar

Don't forget that SC is also the state that gave us the guy who was arrested for fucking a horse.Twice. http://www.huffingtonpost.c...