488 Comments
User's avatar
Adriana Pena's avatar

Are there going to be light sabers?

Let's start the arguments: Which is better Star Trek or Star Wars?

Malcolm Campbell's avatar

Hard to say. We build weapons we don't need for wars we shouldn't be fighting to kill people for reasons we aren't sure of.

mrpuma2u's avatar

Is Mexico paying for this too?

Cyberwulf's avatar

But what if the Spaceballs come to steal our air?

smfh@@rollingmyeyes's avatar

Signed by Richard fucking Nixon, ffs!! Even Nixon was not as stupid as Trump..at least he had the sense to resign! Sorry I feel a rant coming on.

jan_kennard's avatar

More like Space Farce.

Lordpnut's avatar

He'll never get the troops trained; R. Lee Ermy is dead.

L. Ron Pony  🇺🇦's avatar

So when does the Pentagon actually step up and do it? Or are they jizzing their uniform pants at the thought of an even BIGGER budget?

L. Ron Pony  🇺🇦's avatar

Yup. But that doesn't stop it from being real.

L. Ron Pony  🇺🇦's avatar

Y'know, I am fairly sure that the US was one of the signers of a treaty NOT to militarise space. Is Twitler ignoring that the same way he's ignored every other treaty the US has ever signed?

Enter Ranting's avatar

But, tiki torches don't burn in space...

John Saxon's avatar

Exactly. I don't believe that a meaningful victory can be achieved any more. Not sure why you'd want one.

Sarah F. Uckabee's avatar

This logo looks like a little probe going in to explore uranus (or someone's). https://uploads.disquscdn.c...

Sakonyachen for FALGSC's avatar

Bands used to do the same thing on the landing in St. Louis. Back when the landing was important.

Darth Trad's avatar

If you sent a dozen rockets up there and all they did was dump a tonne of steel ball-bearings into orbit you would stop anything from getting up there for a century. The impact of one on anything travelling at velocity would be like firing a .50 cal round point blank. Actually, make them ceramic or glass and impossible to detect. And some cretin will do just that one day.