Discussion about this post

User's avatar
HogeyeGrex🌻's avatar

It's not dishonest in the least. It's not conflating anything. It just doesn't allow you to pretend that you could consider one group's rights without considering the impact that such a sea change might have on other groups.

If you want to play fantasy world where you get to magically rewrite our most basic legal structures, but only for one bunch of people, then talking to you is kind of pointless. Beyond the whole Writ of Attainder aspect, which is repugnant at best, it's sheer mean spirited dehumanization the likes of which I usually only expect from wingnuts.

Quoting one paragraph argumentum ad wikipedium that doesn't even decisively make your point don't make you a bronc buster. Sorry.

If you're interested as to why the KKK isn't technically considered a terrorist group, you might want to read this article, including bits from the Director of Fact Finding for the Anti-Defamation League. Hardly a neo-Nazi icon.

And you still didn't answer my question.

Expand full comment
HogeyeGrex🌻's avatar

Ten sentences is beyond your attention span. Wow.

The whole world is not condensed into 140 characters.

Expand full comment
221 more comments...

No posts