Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Maybe's avatar

Capitalism, socialism, and a whole bunch of other -isms are not mutually exclusive. Certain entities should be taxpayer funded for the good of society. (Technically socialism is public ownership of the means of production, but nowadays it's gone all blurry; a lot of people seem to use it to mean nonprofit.) This could include education, health care, public lands, Social Security, etc.

Certain other entities can be capitalistic--for profit. If they produce non-essential items then they can compete for consumers' disposable income.

Any discussion that focuses on having just one or the other isn't going to go anywhere.

Expand full comment
Maybe's avatar

Ironically in either system you'll find the same sort of people at the top.

Expand full comment
324 more comments...

No posts