11 Comments

Why did you post a picture of Rush Limbaugh's pilondal cyst?

Expand full comment

You're so right. And you can bet that in a 3.5-hour speech HHH never once read from a children's book.

Expand full comment

私のホバークラフトは鰻でいっぱいです

Expand full comment

You say <i>tatbir</i>; I say <i>titty bar</i>.

Expand full comment

「性交のために」、Callyson 氏は述べていますファックの為に。

Sorry, my <strike>Japanese</strike> Google Translate is rusty.

Expand full comment

Fukui-san, any comments on 'o-baka tarrento'?

Expand full comment

We need a pitcher, not a belly itcher.

Expand full comment

What? No word about the Bukkake Bomber?

Expand full comment

<a href="http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2014\/03\/30\/opinion\/sunday\/dignity-is-a-constitutional-principle.html\?partner=rss&amp\;emc=rss&amp\;_r=0" target="_blank">This</a> op-ed by Bruce Ackerman is as good a statement as I've ever read as to why marriage equality matters.

Behold the Happy Warrior here, starting the debate on the Civil Rights Act of 1964:

<blockquote>Humphrey began with a remarkable three-and-a-half-hour speech that introduced the central theme of humiliation by comparing two travel guidebooks: one for families with dogs, the other for blacks. “In Augusta, Ga., for example,” Humphrey noted, “there are five hotels and motels that will take dogs, and only one where a Negro can go with confidence.” He argued that if whites “were to experience the humiliation and insult which awaits Negro Americans in thousands and thousands of such places, we, too, would be quick to protest.” </blockquote>

Expand full comment

Billionaires put their money in getting business schools named after themselves, and every minimum-wage earner in every 7/11 pays a little extra to make that "donation" tax deductible. Does this somehow seem wrong?

Expand full comment

Krugman hasn't exactly been winning another Nobel week after week either. Maybe the whole "regular op-ed columnist" concept needs to be abandoned, along with print media and W2 employment.

Expand full comment