<a href="http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2014\/03\/30\/opinion\/sunday\/dignity-is-a-constitutional-principle.html\?partner=rss&amp\;emc=rss&amp\;_r=0" target="_blank">This</a> op-ed by Bruce Ackerman is as good a statement as I&#039;ve ever read as to why marriage equality matters.
Behold the Happy Warrior here, starting the debate on the Civil Rights Act of 1964:
<blockquote>Humphrey began with a remarkable three-and-a-half-hour speech that introduced the central theme of humiliation by comparing two travel guidebooks: one for families with dogs, the other for blacks. &ldquo;In Augusta, Ga., for example,&rdquo; Humphrey noted, &ldquo;there are five hotels and motels that will take dogs, and only one where a Negro can go with confidence.&rdquo; He argued that if whites &ldquo;were to experience the humiliation and insult which awaits Negro Americans in thousands and thousands of such places, we, too, would be quick to protest.&rdquo; </blockquote>
Billionaires put their money in getting business schools named after themselves, and every minimum-wage earner in every 7/11 pays a little extra to make that &quot;donation&quot; tax deductible. Does this somehow seem wrong?
Krugman hasn&#039;t exactly been winning another Nobel week after week either. Maybe the whole &quot;regular op-ed columnist&quot; concept needs to be abandoned, along with print media and W2 employment.
Why did you post a picture of Rush Limbaugh&#039;s pilondal cyst?
You&#039;re so right. And you can bet that in a 3.5-hour speech HHH never once read from a children&#039;s book.
ç§ã®ããã¼ã¯ã©ããã¯é°»ã§ãã£ã±ãã§ã
You say <i>tatbir</i>; I say <i>titty bar</i>.
ãæ§äº¤ã®ããã«ããCallyson æ°ã¯è¿°ã¹ã¦ãã¾ããã¡ãã¯ã®çºã«ã
Sorry, my <strike>Japanese</strike> Google Translate is rusty.
Fukui-san, any comments on &#039;o-baka tarrento&#039;?
We need a pitcher, not a belly itcher.
What? No word about the Bukkake Bomber?
<a href="http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2014\/03\/30\/opinion\/sunday\/dignity-is-a-constitutional-principle.html\?partner=rss&amp\;emc=rss&amp\;_r=0" target="_blank">This</a> op-ed by Bruce Ackerman is as good a statement as I&#039;ve ever read as to why marriage equality matters.
Behold the Happy Warrior here, starting the debate on the Civil Rights Act of 1964:
<blockquote>Humphrey began with a remarkable three-and-a-half-hour speech that introduced the central theme of humiliation by comparing two travel guidebooks: one for families with dogs, the other for blacks. &ldquo;In Augusta, Ga., for example,&rdquo; Humphrey noted, &ldquo;there are five hotels and motels that will take dogs, and only one where a Negro can go with confidence.&rdquo; He argued that if whites &ldquo;were to experience the humiliation and insult which awaits Negro Americans in thousands and thousands of such places, we, too, would be quick to protest.&rdquo; </blockquote>
Billionaires put their money in getting business schools named after themselves, and every minimum-wage earner in every 7/11 pays a little extra to make that &quot;donation&quot; tax deductible. Does this somehow seem wrong?
Krugman hasn&#039;t exactly been winning another Nobel week after week either. Maybe the whole &quot;regular op-ed columnist&quot; concept needs to be abandoned, along with print media and W2 employment.