Usually, it is the legislative and/or executive branches that do a late-afternoon pre-holiday weekend news dump, hoping to hide something especially egregious in plain sight, thinking you'll be too busy to notice because you're picking up two cases of Bud Light Lime and an absolute fuck-ton of M-80s to take to the cabin. This year, however, we got the treat of seeing the Supreme Court engage in this time-honored tradition, dropping yet another order that is all about ensuring sluts don't get birth control because Jesus.
Gay rights and women's rights are connected; homophobia is a direct consequence of patriarchy and misogyny. Marriage may be turning in the right direction, but these rulings about religious exemptions are totally going to be used to refuse to touch the icky gays. In fact, I think there are already lawsuits doing just that.
As a matter of fact, yes. Obama will make sure the slut pills are paid for with tax money, which will piss the shit out of the teabaggers and fundies . . . but the SCROTUS don't dare fuck with the concept that you don't get to pick out where your tax money goes.
I think this country was a good idea at one time, but it's over now. Ask these wingnuts who spout the "America, fuck yeah!" thing what they think America actually is. They really have no idea. So they vote, stupidly, against their own best interests, and then the rest of us have to take one in the nuts. It should be interesting to see what gets us first - a nuclear explosion or a civil war. No snark, I'm just tired of being pissed all. the. fucking. time.
So, the folks over at Fox are expressing outraged about activist judges, right...?
Back when Dubya was fucking up the country, Pat Robertson prayed Ginsberg and Breyer would retire. I&#039;m just following his lead <a href="http:// <a href="http://:http://www.cbsnews.com/news..."" target="_blank">:http://www.cbsnews.com/news..."</a> target="_blank"> <a href="http://:" rel="nofollow noopener" title="http://www.cbsnews.com/news/praying-for-supreme-court-shake-up/">http://www.cbsnews.com/news..." target="_blank">:" rel="nofollow noopener" title="http://www.cbsnews.com/news/praying-for-supreme-court-shake-up/">http://www.cbsnews.com/news...
Gay rights and women&#039;s rights are connected; homophobia is a direct consequence of patriarchy and misogyny. Marriage may be turning in the right direction, but these rulings about religious exemptions are totally going to be used to refuse to touch the icky gays. In fact, I think there are already lawsuits doing just that.
Just wait till we get the first black lesbian Pope. Then the arc of history will return to its regularly scheduled station.
It&#039;s worse than the Holocaust and Obamacare combined.
I think the Supremes are about to rule that if you object to any of the Rules for Radicals, you can cross your fingers and toes and ignore them.
As a matter of fact, yes. Obama will make sure the slut pills are paid for with tax money, which will piss the shit out of the teabaggers and fundies . . . but the SCROTUS don&#039;t dare fuck with the concept that you don&#039;t get to pick out where your tax money goes.
And all this time I thought them JEWZ killed Jesus, when it probably was a fishing license.
I think this country was a good idea at one time, but it&#039;s over now. Ask these wingnuts who spout the &quot;America, fuck yeah!&quot; thing what they think America actually is. They really have no idea. So they vote, stupidly, against their own best interests, and then the rest of us have to take one in the nuts. It should be interesting to see what gets us first - a nuclear explosion or a civil war. No snark, I&#039;m just tired of being pissed all. the. fucking. time.
this.
scalia and thomas are especially vulnerable.
That&#039;s it, basically.
Fuuuuucccckkkk.
Buncha assholes.
...in other news, Lucy has tricked Charlie Brown into attempting to kick the football again!
they can be impeached by the House or removed if convicted of a crime in a Senate trial.
Issa to start hearings on that Wize Latina B*tch in 3..2...1
Remember the fuss about whether a Catholic president would defer to the Vatican?