You will probably find this very difficult to believe, but it's possible that the National Rifle Association is a big lying liar. No, not just about how guns are the only thing standing between freedom and tyranny, or about the how everyone needs a gun to safely get through breakfast, or even about how the Second Amendment was handed down from Jesus so that America would always be God's favorite country. No, it seems that the NRA may
Not that it'll happen but how many times can the NRA just buck the laws before they get forcibly dissolved (disarmed)? A guy can dream that this nest of gun lobbyist vipers can go away, right?
To be fair to the gun toters, Jesus was reportedly sort of the son of God and stuff and had a pre-ordained death and resurrection so he really didn't need to go arming himself for self defense.Though I do recall him saying hippy shit like put away your sword or turn the other cheek. Commie, probably.
Because the NRA is withholding legally required tax dollars on principle. "We don't want our tax dollars going to support public health gun research (oh wait...), national databases that keep track of dangerous people who shouldn't buy guns , nor Medicaid dollars for the babbies who get shot by their siblings....plus a whole bunch of other stuff...
Really though, if the nra has spent "more than $34 million between 2007 and 20013" that doesn't average out to much over 18,006 years. (Sorry, apparently snark detector is on the fritz.)
Says a guy who needs to carry a deadly weapon around at all-times as a mark of bravery and masculinity. Here I'll help you out, ammosexual: "Huh huh, I like to hump muh guns and don't yew cum between me an 'em"
Wow, good logic I think I'll take a moment and consider oh wait, it's retarded. Seriously, if you need your little steel penis substitute to feel like a man, cool...I'm sure your sheep will be happy, "thank god our Republican master isn't fucking us again". I'm just saying your logic is some cowardly shit, no one NEEDS a gun outside of rifles in the rural areas because thanks to voting GOP they are the poorest areas in the country and need to hunt to eat. In terms of your aggravated gun nuttery, you don't NEED a gun and you aren't observing your rights by considering yourself duty bound to own one.
The constitution isn't a "use or lose it" document unless Republicans are in charge- furthermore your little analogy ignores the fact that most Western countries including Japan and China have low gun ownership while the third world has high ownership AND you're ignoring that by % of the population our gun ownership keeps decreasing. Face it, you're just spouting industry talking points, you're like a company man who doesn't get paid jack shit for shilling...kind of sad, really.
You sound like an expert, need I go over all the repressed homosexuals outed on the wingnut side? Shit it's becoming something of an oddity when one of you gets caught with a woman anymore, you're paradoxes. Of course every other society that has embraced hyper masculinity culturally has also had LOTS of butt sechs from Sparta to Japan to well, teabaggers. Besides, there's a term I want you to know: overcompensating. You reek of it, from your idiotic gun nuttery (again you can't address that for being such a 'fundamental' part of human society, why does every other Western country approach gun ownership with disdain?) as for the mythical 'attacker' coming at me with a weapon it's like the ticking time bomb scenario, a complete fallacy.
Oh and greeted with the same scenario it's likely your little gun will be taken away from you, shoved up your narrow pasty ass and fired because your 'attacker' is likely to be a hell of a lot more desperate and experienced than you are. So, go on and piss your pants NRA guy about the imaginary home invaders and robbers lurking in the bushes, oh and by the way, I prefer to live in reality.
Had your sincerely held illusions shattered?
I'll get my kit.
Not that it'll happen but how many times can the NRA just buck the laws before they get forcibly dissolved (disarmed)? A guy can dream that this nest of gun lobbyist vipers can go away, right?
amusing
you misspelled 'terrifying'
always!
It's not the crazies with guns that politicians fear- Pepé LePierre has something far scarier to those pols- the NRA checkbook
And which duly elected shitmuffin will be the first to take a stand against the tyrannical IRS in support of the patriotic NRA?
To be fair to the gun toters, Jesus was reportedly sort of the son of God and stuff and had a pre-ordained death and resurrection so he really didn't need to go arming himself for self defense.Though I do recall him saying hippy shit like put away your sword or turn the other cheek. Commie, probably.
Because the NRA is withholding legally required tax dollars on principle. "We don't want our tax dollars going to support public health gun research (oh wait...), national databases that keep track of dangerous people who shouldn't buy guns , nor Medicaid dollars for the babbies who get shot by their siblings....plus a whole bunch of other stuff...
Really though, if the nra has spent "more than $34 million between 2007 and 20013" that doesn't average out to much over 18,006 years. (Sorry, apparently snark detector is on the fritz.)
In desperate need of psychiatric meds?
SarahPAC found the ultimate loophole. If you pay your "consultants" enough, you won't have any money left for political campaigns.
Can't wait for what "Dear Shit fer Brains" has to say about this.
Says a guy who needs to carry a deadly weapon around at all-times as a mark of bravery and masculinity. Here I'll help you out, ammosexual: "Huh huh, I like to hump muh guns and don't yew cum between me an 'em"
Wow, good logic I think I'll take a moment and consider oh wait, it's retarded. Seriously, if you need your little steel penis substitute to feel like a man, cool...I'm sure your sheep will be happy, "thank god our Republican master isn't fucking us again". I'm just saying your logic is some cowardly shit, no one NEEDS a gun outside of rifles in the rural areas because thanks to voting GOP they are the poorest areas in the country and need to hunt to eat. In terms of your aggravated gun nuttery, you don't NEED a gun and you aren't observing your rights by considering yourself duty bound to own one.
The constitution isn't a "use or lose it" document unless Republicans are in charge- furthermore your little analogy ignores the fact that most Western countries including Japan and China have low gun ownership while the third world has high ownership AND you're ignoring that by % of the population our gun ownership keeps decreasing. Face it, you're just spouting industry talking points, you're like a company man who doesn't get paid jack shit for shilling...kind of sad, really.
You sound like an expert, need I go over all the repressed homosexuals outed on the wingnut side? Shit it's becoming something of an oddity when one of you gets caught with a woman anymore, you're paradoxes. Of course every other society that has embraced hyper masculinity culturally has also had LOTS of butt sechs from Sparta to Japan to well, teabaggers. Besides, there's a term I want you to know: overcompensating. You reek of it, from your idiotic gun nuttery (again you can't address that for being such a 'fundamental' part of human society, why does every other Western country approach gun ownership with disdain?) as for the mythical 'attacker' coming at me with a weapon it's like the ticking time bomb scenario, a complete fallacy.
Oh and greeted with the same scenario it's likely your little gun will be taken away from you, shoved up your narrow pasty ass and fired because your 'attacker' is likely to be a hell of a lot more desperate and experienced than you are. So, go on and piss your pants NRA guy about the imaginary home invaders and robbers lurking in the bushes, oh and by the way, I prefer to live in reality.