194 Comments
User's avatar
Maybe's avatar

If he's suing, does that mean he'd have to go through discovery at some point or is this a different sort of lawsuit?

Dreadful, Pure SCUM!'s avatar

Very. More helpful in general.

LadyTavestock's avatar

I do, and I also assume a high rate of domestic violence - so I don't date them either.

LadyTavestock's avatar

We'll subpoena the fishing string and listen to what you said!

Catbird's avatar

The illogic of his argument is staggering. MAGAt attorneys must be on meth.

Catbird's avatar

Icing on the fecal cupcake.

"M"'s avatar

I am delighting in

"this doomed piece of crap"

as the signifying descriptive for this execrable "complaint"

😁

-=|Seriously, ☑️|=-'s avatar

In the long run, that didn’t end well for South Africa.

"M"'s avatar

Otherwise known as the "dish it out but can't take it" attempted offense

They’re all just terrible, and I'd find myself astonished as to why those attorneys haven't been sanctioned out of the bar if it weren't for the fact that I know the entirety of the rules of the Western professional world errs in favor of covering up the damaging and dangerous acts of incompetent white men

Swampay's avatar

Scavino made the now-familiar argument flogged by every other Trumper contesting the Select Committee's subpoena for documents and testimony that the committee lacks a valid legislative purpose and is thus illegal.I wonder if that would have worked for the buttery emails /Benghazi trials?

mzf's avatar

trump university. Obviously.

Swampay's avatar

Has this guy heard of the Streisand effect?