194 Comments

If he's suing, does that mean he'd have to go through discovery at some point or is this a different sort of lawsuit?

Expand full comment

Very. More helpful in general.

Expand full comment

I do, and I also assume a high rate of domestic violence - so I don't date them either.

Expand full comment

We'll subpoena the fishing string and listen to what you said!

Expand full comment

The illogic of his argument is staggering. MAGAt attorneys must be on meth.

Expand full comment

Icing on the fecal cupcake.

Expand full comment

I am delighting in

"this doomed piece of crap"

as the signifying descriptive for this execrable "complaint"

😁

Expand full comment

In the long run, that didn’t end well for South Africa.

Expand full comment

Otherwise known as the "dish it out but can't take it" attempted offense

They’re all just terrible, and I'd find myself astonished as to why those attorneys haven't been sanctioned out of the bar if it weren't for the fact that I know the entirety of the rules of the Western professional world errs in favor of covering up the damaging and dangerous acts of incompetent white men

Expand full comment

*snort*

Expand full comment

Scavino made the now-familiar argument flogged by every other Trumper contesting the Select Committee's subpoena for documents and testimony that the committee lacks a valid legislative purpose and is thus illegal.I wonder if that would have worked for the buttery emails /Benghazi trials?

Expand full comment

trump university. Obviously.

Expand full comment

Was it, though, really

https://youtu.be/ZWwcZLqF3Qs

Expand full comment

Has this guy heard of the Streisand effect?

Expand full comment