194 Comments
User's avatar
Maybe's avatar

If he's suing, does that mean he'd have to go through discovery at some point or is this a different sort of lawsuit?

Expand full comment
Dreadful, Pure SCUM!'s avatar

Very. More helpful in general.

Expand full comment
LadyTavestock's avatar

I do, and I also assume a high rate of domestic violence - so I don't date them either.

Expand full comment
LadyTavestock's avatar

We'll subpoena the fishing string and listen to what you said!

Expand full comment
Catbird's avatar

The illogic of his argument is staggering. MAGAt attorneys must be on meth.

Expand full comment
Catbird's avatar

Icing on the fecal cupcake.

Expand full comment
"M"'s avatar

I am delighting in

"this doomed piece of crap"

as the signifying descriptive for this execrable "complaint"

😁

Expand full comment
-=|Seriously, ☑️|=-'s avatar

In the long run, that didn’t end well for South Africa.

Expand full comment
"M"'s avatar

Otherwise known as the "dish it out but can't take it" attempted offense

They’re all just terrible, and I'd find myself astonished as to why those attorneys haven't been sanctioned out of the bar if it weren't for the fact that I know the entirety of the rules of the Western professional world errs in favor of covering up the damaging and dangerous acts of incompetent white men

Expand full comment
"M"'s avatar

*snort*

Expand full comment
Swampay's avatar

Scavino made the now-familiar argument flogged by every other Trumper contesting the Select Committee's subpoena for documents and testimony that the committee lacks a valid legislative purpose and is thus illegal.I wonder if that would have worked for the buttery emails /Benghazi trials?

Expand full comment
mzf's avatar

trump university. Obviously.

Expand full comment
"M"'s avatar

Was it, though, really

https://youtu.be/ZWwcZLqF3Qs

Expand full comment
Swampay's avatar

Has this guy heard of the Streisand effect?

Expand full comment