Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Crip Dyke's avatar

I have a Strauder v West Virginia and it says ONLY OTHER BILLIONAIRES CAN JUDGE ME, and I have a list, a whole list of the best people, the best billionaires, who would have been on the jury. I had one billionaire who came to me and said, "Sir, you are the best of us. You could have been the riches man on the planet, bigger than Musk. Bigger than Gates. Bigger than both of them combined or even all of us combined, but you chose service to your country and we respect that." But the crooked and corrupt Judge Patsy, exploited by AG "Jungle" James doesn't respect me. She thinks she can use the law of the jungle instead of the law of the law because she failed to get elected governor and cares more about her politics than business of New York, the worst city in the world which would be the best if their corrupt, anti-Trump politicians would get run out of town and put the good ones in charge again, like whatever happened to Rudy? He was a good guy but he got railroaded, when who should be railroaded is this entire court room but I guess they don't have rail roads in the jungle, do they Jungle James?

Expand full comment
defpac's avatar

Oh my fucking God. Even Wonkette doesn't get it. Fucking Jesus Christ.

The point is not that he did throw a tantrum.

The point is that the AG office spoke for one hour, summarizing the case, and rebutting all of the key defenses. Nobody talks about that. Because everybody thinks the important part was that stupid pre-planned tantrum stunt.

I get it why the judge allowed it, but hey, why do WE care about it?

How many fucking more years does it take before you, we, WONKETTE figures that you watch the hand of the magician, and that his words do not fucking matter; as they are (most often) a DISTRACTION. The important aspect is: what is it distracting me from?

https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/1745511573198610717 ---

"Dear the Press: The REASON Trump launches these tirades, is bc he knows you're all INCAPABLE of reporting on the evidence that came before it. Simply absolute incapable of reporting on anything but his tirade, allowing him to drown out facts."

Expand full comment
396 more comments...

No posts