295 Comments
User's avatar
grrrlgeek πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦πŸ‡΅πŸ‡ΈπŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ's avatar

I sent my rep a strongly worded email. Idk wtf he's doing., given that we live in the Chicago area. I even refrained from calling him a spineless fucking mothrfucker who sucks at the teat of naziesque authoritarians. It took all my willpower.

CJLB's avatar

Good news. Thanks, Doc.

Zyxomma's avatar

Ta, Dok. I can conjure up the hit list without hesitation.

Sean McCoy Writes's avatar

As someone who works in the Nonprofit Sector...fuck this bill and fuck anyone who votes for it.

Doctor Kiddo's avatar

If enacted this law would also be used to target non-profit organizations that assist women who need to cross state lines for abortion care, parents who cross state lines for medical care for their trans kids, etc., etc. SCROTUS will make sure this law defines terrorism to include anything the X-tian nationalists don't like.

Mathew Reuther's avatar

Great. Good to know Levin is on that list. Also fantastic that it appears his "email me" sends things to the circular file.

Michael Bowen's avatar

For the first time in my life, I called my rep and told his office person that she should let him know that I did not vote for him to prematurely surrender to the incoming regime.

simpledinosaur's avatar

The two key things Trump will go after right away, I believe, are the First Amendment and the integrity of our electoral system. These are the prime targets because if they remain intact, Trump will face a relatively normal mid-term election in 2026, by which time he may have disenchanted more than enough voters to lose his majorities in Congress. As things stand, it looks like he will have only a slim majority in the House. And if free speech continues unabated, criticism of him will grow and grow until it hobbles his administration for 2026. It's "Dictatorship 101" stuff, I suppose.

Thomas Pearce's avatar

Would so love to see the IRS targeting the hate preachers and hate β€œchurches” that are up to their necks in engaging in political activity. Instead the republimericans will try to target any group that sends blankets to war victims. Hmmmm….weaponization of government??

Hellsbells69's avatar

He won’t go after those; well maybe if they haven’t bought his bible.

Stephanie Hobbs's avatar

OMG. It isn't even January and I am so done. #TrumpIsNotFitToBePresident

Ashannfishsticks's avatar

I'm hopeful that some of these names are on the list because they conferred with other Dems and knew it wasn't going to get the threshold but was some kind of signal to Republican constituents? Slotkin specifically (she's going to the Senate soon but got plenty of R votes).

Michael Bowen's avatar

I'd check on how much each of those Dems received from AIPAC.

Ethereal Fairy's avatar

Richie Torres is a complete sell out.

TOP CONTRIBUTOR 2021 - 2022

American Israel Public Affairs Cmte

$141,008

https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/ritchie-torres/summary?cid=N00044346&cycle=2022

Ashannfishsticks's avatar

That's valid. A bummer, but valid.

Khavrinen's avatar

"[C]iting the potential for Donald Trump to use the power arbitrarily."

I think you mean "citing the CERTAINTY that Donald Trump would use the power maliciously".

Whale Chowder's avatar

Some surprising names on that list of Democrats, including Schiff, Allred and Sharice Davids. Really?

Also: "Fairness Meter?" WTF, Newsweek, don't you have any judgement of your own? Did someone in management issue a challenge of "find me the easiest way to skew our coverage right while providing cover so the liberals won't whinge"? Own your own fucking rightwing stories, fuckers.

Antifa Commander's avatar

the 52 Democrats who did support the bill

*don't be on it Moulton don’t be on it Moulton* Whew! He’s not.

Hellsbells69's avatar

Lloyd Dogget is my representative!

You Should Ice That Burn's avatar

A rare example of good news spurred by a Texan in government!