University Of Michigan Med Students Walk Out On Forced Birther's Keynote Speech
The kids are all right.
Throngs of new University of Michigan medical students walked out of their own white coat ceremony on Sunday to protest the school's choice for keynote speaker, an assistant professor with a history of publicly advocating against abortion. The students had previously filed a petition asking the school to replace Dr. Kristin Collier with an alternative speaker, signed by 100 incoming students, 248 current students and 76 others including alumni, residents, physicians, and graduate students, but the school decided to go ahead with its decision anyway.
“Incoming medical students walk out at University of Michigan’s white coat ceremony as the keynote speaker is openly anti-abortion”
— Scorpiio (@Scorpiio) 1658694164
The White Coat Ceremony is a particularly important day for University of Michigan's new medical students. It's the day they get their white coats, signifying their entry into the field of medicine. It is a day that is supposed to be about the students. In the parlance of ladies on bridal reality shows, it is their special day. For the school to ignore them and use their day to give a platform to someone who wishes to take away their reproductive rights, particularly right after the overturning of Roe v. Wade, was pretty offensive to many students.
In the petition, the students explained that while they respected Dr. Collier's right to freedom of speech and religion, they felt they deserved a speaker "whose values align with institutional policies, students, and the broader medical community ," as well as one who "inspire[s] the next generation of healthcare providers to be courageous advocates for patient autonomy and our communities." As aspiring doctors, a speaker who would restrict access to medical care was not someone they felt should be honored in that way.
“I’m already scared that I’ve chosen to attend school in a state where I may very well lose my right to a safe abortion, and the decision by UMMS to have Dr. Collier as a keynote speaker makes this even scarier," one student was quoted as saying. "It makes me seriously doubt whether the school will continue to advocate for reproductive rights.”
“There are those who will say that healthcare and medicine ought to be an apolitical space, and that our cohorts' rejection of Dr. Kristin Collier as speaker is thereby inappropriate in that it represents a political position. But medicine is inherently political in so far as the health of current and future patients is dictated and shaped by social and political forces." said another. "More so, it is simply irrational and inconsistent for Dr. Collier to speak at a ceremony wherein incoming students vow to uphold patient autonomy when she herself devalues such a moral principle. I am deeply disappointed in the selection of Dr. Collier for keynote speaker and do not wish to listen to her words, nevertheless be inspired by them at the beginning of my medical education."
It is not necessary for every person to have every platform, particularly platforms that are intended to be an honor. As one student said, "her appearance would be better suited for a learning opportunity or debate at a different time, not at a ceremony where families will be in attendance and potential resentment will sour the occasion.” Which it clearly did!
That being said, good for these students for standing up for themselves, as well as for their future patients.
Do your Amazon shopping through this link, because reasons .
Wonkette is independent and fully funded by readers like you. Click below to tip us!
Sorry, should I have finished it off by hitting the caps lock and typing "VOTE", since that seems to be the reigning definition of activism around here? I could rattle off the number of times I've been in the streets in protest (all of them more recently than 1973) but that's not the point; the point is that some of y'all of *ahem* a certain age need to take a clear-eyed look at how deeply obnoxious you are when you blame younger generations (which include people who are, like myself *literally middle aged by now*) for the political hellscape they are in by implying that we're here because, unlike yourselves fifty years ago, we *just didn't work hard enough*. This is especially true of abortion access. The all-out assault on reproductive liberty was well underway by the time I was born. *89% of the counties in America* lacked an abortion provider *before* this heinous ruling. We have literally never lived in a country in which our autonomy over our bodies was protected.
I'm forty. Save the young miss for the kids on your lawn. I'm also the granddaughter of a woman who was a nurse in pre-Roe America who made sure to impress upon my mother and I the horror of what she saw. Even back in the olden days (that is, the 90s) before I could vote, I was getting ready for what I knew was going to be a lifelong fight for reproductive autonomy, even if at the time all I could do was read up and speak out. By the time I could vote I could add protest, clinic support, and eventually financial support to that list. But I don't owe you my CV, especially since you seem to be under the impression that rights are something you secure for others in exchange for their fealty. I never experienced the full rights extended by Roe; they were already being unraveled by the time I was born, much less by the time I had the ability to respond.