16 Comments
User's avatar
bobbert's avatar

But it would just put you "in 'ospital".

Chris Grrr's avatar

Is "Soshulist" revenue-neutral?

Comrade Wingtardd's avatar

What does Chuck Grassley think of this?

bobbert's avatar

Apparently, you needed to post a bigger sign.

bobbert's avatar

Well, for that matter, I pronounce it HIstory. Duz it to you?

π”…π”’π”’π”©π”·π”’π”Ÿπ”²π”Ÿπ”Ÿπ”ž's avatar

Workers smart enough to spell, but not smart enough to know you're screwing them? Wal-Mart knows, that's a tough balancing act.

Pierre_de_Fermat's avatar

But ... but ... isn't being cruel just because you can what Jeebus, the Founding Fathers, Herbert Hoover, Ronald Reagan and everyone who matters think?

π”…π”’π”’π”©π”·π”’π”Ÿπ”²π”Ÿπ”Ÿπ”ž's avatar

First it's a one-person-one-post policy, and next thing you know it's Communist China!

π”…π”’π”’π”©π”·π”’π”Ÿπ”²π”Ÿπ”Ÿπ”ž's avatar

Unless you're visting London, look the wrong way when crossing a street, and the tyre of a passing lorry puts you in an 'ospital.

PubOption's avatar

Why are you using a picture of Patrick Moore? His grammar is good, although he is a bit 'strange'.

Dashboard Buddha's avatar

Because peanut farmers vote and (going out on a limb here) tend to vote (with the exception of at least one) republican?

chascates's avatar

Food stamps have now become another middle class entitlement, like affordable college.

SullivanSt's avatar

Doesn't the WSJ think it's the job of the private sector to educate people anyway? So, STFU, WSJ!

SullivanSt's avatar

And less expanding the market for the food they do grow, <em>of course</em>.