The Wall Street Journal is shaking its cane regarding Congress's unseemly refusal to reform food stamps. Why are Democrats uniting to stop hero Senator Jeff Sessions' teeny-tiny $20 billion snip to the program? After all, going on the dole used to be shameful, and now food stamps go to people even if they live in a house and perhaps own a car! Yes, all these rich vulgar Americans are soaking the Department of Agriculture by getting help eating food. It is a national outrage and the Wall Street Journal will not rest in its whining until this gross practice stops. But is there another, more important thing on which Americans should be focused, rather than on giving milk, eggs, and cheese to women with children? Or subsidizing the non-starving of
But ... but ... isn't being cruel just because you can what Jeebus, the Founding Fathers, Herbert Hoover, Ronald Reagan and everyone who matters think?
But it would just put you "in 'ospital".
Is "Soshulist" revenue-neutral?
What does Chuck Grassley think of this?
Apparently, you needed to post a bigger sign.
Well, for that matter, I pronounce it HIstory. Duz it to you?
Workers smart enough to spell, but not smart enough to know you're screwing them? Wal-Mart knows, that's a tough balancing act.
Positive feedback, FTW.
But ... but ... isn't being cruel just because you can what Jeebus, the Founding Fathers, Herbert Hoover, Ronald Reagan and everyone who matters think?
First it's a one-person-one-post policy, and next thing you know it's Communist China!
Wait ... I have it! Ethanol Stamps!!!!!!!!
Unless you're visting London, look the wrong way when crossing a street, and the tyre of a passing lorry puts you in an 'ospital.
Why are you using a picture of Patrick Moore? His grammar is good, although he is a bit 'strange'.
Because peanut farmers vote and (going out on a limb here) tend to vote (with the exception of at least one) republican?
Food stamps have now become another middle class entitlement, like affordable college.
Doesn't the WSJ think it's the job of the private sector to educate people anyway? So, STFU, WSJ!
And less expanding the market for the food they do grow, <em>of course</em>.