"Although I support the Senate’s effort to reduce the number of wealthier households that will receive stimulus checks, they did not go far enough" -Jared Golden
It's going by income before the pandemic, WTF are you on about, how do you not know this
I did one better; I'm having a nutritional shake that's got actual vitamins in it that are good for me.
My goal to cut down a bit on my ridiculous coffee consumption has been fairly successful. Living on caffeine isn't good for a person's blood pressure or fine motor skills.
Apparently the full statement: "While the Senate made modest changes to the legislation, some of those changes undermined parts of the bill I do support, and others were insufficient to address my concerns with the overall size and scope of the bill. Although I support the Senate’s effort to reduce the number of wealthier households that will receive stimulus checks, they did not go far enough, and other changes — like removing the minimum wage increase or providing a lower unemployment benefit — undermined policies that I support. I voted for a $15 minimum wage in the last Congress, and given the opportunity, I intend to do so again"
Great yeah voting against something based on your personal tiny little issues that don't go 100% your way is totally the thing to do. You should tell your constituents to do that!
True; just don’t OD.
"Although I support the Senate’s effort to reduce the number of wealthier households that will receive stimulus checks, they did not go far enough" -Jared Golden
It's going by income before the pandemic, WTF are you on about, how do you not know this
I did one better; I'm having a nutritional shake that's got actual vitamins in it that are good for me.
My goal to cut down a bit on my ridiculous coffee consumption has been fairly successful. Living on caffeine isn't good for a person's blood pressure or fine motor skills.
There isn't any other kind, esteemed Knid.
Jared Golden of Maine
https://youtu.be/9jK-NcRmVcw
I mean, I derped badly miss swearing a question in class 20 years ago, it’s still in my Inner Film Reels of Shame.
I figured he was the one who voted nay for the resolution.
There it is. Not enough votes left to block it's passage!
“Misanswering” I said! I’m making up words over here!
Yess!!!!
Apparently the full statement: "While the Senate made modest changes to the legislation, some of those changes undermined parts of the bill I do support, and others were insufficient to address my concerns with the overall size and scope of the bill. Although I support the Senate’s effort to reduce the number of wealthier households that will receive stimulus checks, they did not go far enough, and other changes — like removing the minimum wage increase or providing a lower unemployment benefit — undermined policies that I support. I voted for a $15 minimum wage in the last Congress, and given the opportunity, I intend to do so again"
Great yeah voting against something based on your personal tiny little issues that don't go 100% your way is totally the thing to do. You should tell your constituents to do that!
GOP defection!
A Republican voted aye?Strange.Edit: oops, false alarm. Still, this resolution shall pass.
So...he's saying the relief wasn't "targeted" enough? GTFO.
WTF? Wrong button?