453 Comments
User's avatar
reynard61's avatar

It *seems* to be a bit of strength (as opposed to "virtue") signaling, i.e. "The U.S. won't let some silly (if often lethal) virus keep us from going about our normal daily routine so we're perfectly willing to risk *your* kids safety to show this to the rest of the world."

mrpuma2u's avatar

No wait Chuck Woolery is going to be our next WH Chief of Staff, so they will have to keep Dr. Fauci a bit longer

mark99k's avatar

Trump could fire Fauci today and Fauci wouldn't lose even one bit of the attention that this ignorant, murderous administration wants to deny him. It's quite possible he could speak much more frankly. Fauci is 79, doesn't need a paycheck at this point, and would probably do more good for the universe without Orange Pussball breathing down his neck.

Peripatetic Poltroon's avatar

I assume (possibly erroneously) that Trump's authority to fire civil servants is not limitless. Head of NIAID doesn't seem like a patronage position. *Can* Trump legally fire him?

AdmNaismith's avatar

Came here to say this.

AdmNaismith's avatar

What do you mean? You talk to them and they do shit for you . Still more reliable than Siri.

AdmNaismith's avatar

^This.

I'd skywrite it.

Mahousu's avatar

The President can't directly fire career civil service employees. Their supervisors can, of course, but only in accordance with the Civil Service Reform Act - basically, only for (documented) misconduct or poor performance.

∮ciGuy ⚗ 🝧 🔬 ☢'s avatar

2600 hits, all titles bashing him. Awesome. I did not even think to do a trump search. /hattip

Delu's avatar

Notice how Woolery never mentioned Trump or the Republicans in his "Everyone is lying!" tweet.

Mehitabel's avatar

Even Maggie Haberman isn't swallowing it? It must be bad, then, because she'll swallow pretty much anything the Trump Administration squirts in her direction.

Slamtundra's avatar

I think you got it.

Un-goddamn-belivable.

Amy!'s avatar

Hey, it was fucking cold, all right?