10 Comments

F.C.U.?

I think I can pronounce that.

Expand full comment

That religious test only applies to different flavors of Christianity, which may include Catholics (Santorum) or may not (Kennedy).

Expand full comment

Does this guy have some golden plates he would like to decipher?

Expand full comment

Gabriel? Could he be an angel like Moroni?

Expand full comment

Brings to mind a <a href="http:\/\/books.google.com\/books\?id=cWm4VfqaADkC&amp\;pg=PT288&amp\;lpg=PT288&amp\;dq=vast%20lagoons%20of%20pig%20feces&amp\;source=bl&amp\;ots=jTggRpZMBT&amp\;sig=87dRHHMY_Y3vHR9tW8EIkWkDhOM&amp\;hl=en&amp\;sa=X&amp\;ei=yOx1UI6dMcLH0QHCx4CgBA&amp\;ved=0CDMQ6AEwAA" target="_blank">certain chapter</a> of <em>Lies and the Lying Liars who Tell Them</em>, doesn't it?

Expand full comment

Wait a sec, my wedding ring is sort of squiggly, too. This can mean only one thing -

<i>I'm</i> married to Michelle Obama. Sorry, Barry, she's mine.

Expand full comment

It's actually Swahili for 'James Brown is the hardest workin' man in show business'.

Expand full comment

I didn't need further proof that anyone who believes a single word on WND, except <em>possibly</em> the bylines, is a complete fucking moron with no redeeming features, but you went ahead and gave it to me, didn't you?

I mean seriously, their picture evidence is conclusive proof of one thing in addition to one of two other things. It's certainly conclusive proof that Obama's ring is <em>not</em> engraved with the Shahada, and secondly it's conclusive proof that <em>either</em> the site's ownership is unbelievably stupid, <em>or</em> they're thoroughly dishonest, I mean like zombie Epimenides can't even believe how mendacious they are.

Expand full comment

It says "Sh'ma Y'Israel".

Expand full comment

<i>who has a doctorate in “Christian Education”</i>

The only thing that would get you less job interviews than this on your resume is a felony conviction.

Expand full comment