"I can't understand why the court gave her full custody and makes me pay so much child support. I mean, I only got drunk and beat her and the kids every night and she only found me banging that floozy from work in our bed twice, and the kids weren't even home the first time. The system is stacked against men, we gotta take the power back!"
Well, Conservatards are good at rote learning dictates from their chosen authority figures, so there's that.
But then, they clearly lack reading comprehension since we atheists typically do by far better jobs of living the principles of the New Testament than those who most vociferously claim to be doing so.
What would be really fun would be if the teams got to set questions for each other. There's plenty of parts of the Bible they don't really like to talk about outside of quiet rooms.
Oh looky, their <a href="http:\/\/gsntv.com\/shows\/the-american-bible-challenge\/casting\/" target="_blank">casting form</a> has entries in the religious affiliation drop down for &quot;nondenominational&quot;, &quot;other&quot; and &quot;not disclosed&quot;, but faking a &quot;great personal testimony&quot; might not be too easy for anyone not fluent in Vangy
Of course they had a choice ... and the Repukes believe that every other woman has the right to make the same choice. And they do mean the <i>same</i> choice.
Santorum: somewhat to the <em>right</em> of Genghis Khan.
VA-08 libel!
&quot;I can&#039;t understand why the court gave her full custody and makes me pay so much child support. I mean, I only got drunk and beat her and the kids every night and she only found me banging that floozy from work in our bed twice, and the kids weren&#039;t even home the first time. The system is stacked against men, we gotta take the power back!&quot;
Pat Toomey was more interested in equating taxation with rape.
Sound advice for any situation.
Comment from the site attached to that sneaky comma link. ...score 1 for the Christians... There was no comment on the score for the lions.
Another politician trying to fool us with a combover. Will he be one to introduce the Donald?
Well, Conservatards are good at rote learning dictates from their chosen authority figures, so there&#039;s that.
But then, they clearly lack reading comprehension since we atheists typically do by far better jobs of living the principles of the New Testament than those who most vociferously claim to be doing so.
What would be really fun would be if the teams got to set questions for each other. There&#039;s plenty of parts of the Bible they don&#039;t really like to talk about outside of quiet rooms.
Oh looky, their <a href="http:\/\/gsntv.com\/shows\/the-american-bible-challenge\/casting\/" target="_blank">casting form</a> has entries in the religious affiliation drop down for &quot;nondenominational&quot;, &quot;other&quot; and &quot;not disclosed&quot;, but faking a &quot;great personal testimony&quot; might not be too easy for anyone not fluent in Vangy
Of course they had a choice ... and the Repukes believe that every other woman has the right to make the same choice. And they do mean the <i>same</i> choice.
Living in the same space-time contiuum is &#039;Grrr Rape&#039;.
The heathen ally of my heathen ally is my righteous brother.
Throw in some Anchor Babies (terrorist or otherwise) and we&#039;ve got a party!
So that&#039;s two prawn uterus, a Jamie Leigh Jones and four rape salads.
However... I don&#039;t mean to suggest that the one that does the motherfucking might not do a little cocksucking on the side...
How is babby formed?
Wait, is that real? I was looking for obvious signs of snark but didn&#039;t see any, and the site seems earnest.