Donate

Sandra Day O'Connor Finally Realizes Bush v. Gore Ruling Was Terrible

News

How do you solve a problem like retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor? On the one hand, she was the first lady justice on the court, so attention must be paid. Also, she often (though not always) stood up for lady rights on said court, so attention must be paid to that too. Thank you, Justice O'Connor, for all of that.Buuuuuuuuuuutttttttttttt, on the other hand, she cast what was probably the deciding vote in one of the most egregious, despicable, are-you-fucking-kidding-us-SCOTUS? decisions EVER, the abomination known as Bush v. Gore. You remember that case, don't you, boys and girls? When the Supreme Court stuck its big judicial nose in Florida's electoral bidness, and decided to make George Dubya Bush the president of these United States? Even though he lost the election, and his brother helped rig the voter rolls in Florida, and his pals at Fox "News" tried to call the election for him before the votes were counted? No, you have probably forgotten by now. We know we had.


The Court, as you do not recall, knew at the time it was a bullshit ruling, which is why it included that little asterisk saying basically, "Yes, we know this is a bullshit ruling, so let us never speak of it again." And O'Connor voted in favor of the aforementioned bullshit ruling, so thanks for nothing.

But on the third hand (what? some people have three hands), now Sandy feels sort of bad about that whole Bush v. Gore thing. In a recent interview with the Chicago Tribune, she kinda sorta expressed the tiniest shred of regret about that:

Looking back, O'Connor said, she isn't sure the high court should have taken the case.

"It took the case and decided it at a time when it was still a big election issue," O'Connor said during a talk Friday with the Tribune editorial board. "Maybe the court should have said, 'We're not going to take it, goodbye.'"

The case, she said, "stirred up the public" and "gave the court a less-than-perfect reputation."

"Obviously the court did reach a decision and thought it had to reach a decision," she said. "It turned out the election authorities in Florida hadn't done a real good job there and kind of messed it up. And probably the Supreme Court added to the problem at the end of the day."

Um, yeah. Yeah, the Supreme Court kind of did add to the problem, what with handing the keys to the White House to that som'bitch who did not actually win the election and then strutted around the globe bombing shit and destroying shit and then smirking and chuckling about it, like, "Whoops, invaded the wrong country for a made up reason, heh heh, oh well, now I'm gonna go paint something." It's nice that after 13 years, O'Connor is willing to consider the possibility that maybe it wasn't such a good call after all, and by "nice" we mean what the hell took so long.

[Chicago Tribune]

$
Donate with CC

HOLY ACHTUNG TWITTER IS FREAKING OUT! Special Counsel Robert Mueller's office (SCO) has issued a statement, almost 24 full hours after Buzzfeed's story on Donald Trump ordering Michael Cohen to lie to Congress about the failed Trump Tower Moscow deal started blowing everybody's minds. Mueller's spokesman says actually BuzzFeed got it a bit wrong. This is significant because 1) Mueller's office NEVER talks, and B) well, they're not actually saying BuzzFeed got it WRONG wrong. Just, you know, kinda wrong.

Wow, that statement is lawyered as fuck. BuzzFeed described "specific statements" wrong, and its "characterization of documents and testimony" was just an eensy bit off, and maybe if BuzzFeed moved this sofa over here it would take advantage of more natural light in the room, and honestly, BuzzFeed should trim up this one paragraph of its article, because those sentences DO NOT SPARK MARIE KONDO'S JOY.

Otherwise, it's great!

First of all, we want everybody to relax. Donald Trump is still a criminal.

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC

It's been a joy watching the reactions come in from TrumpWorld about the news that Donald Trump has committed YET ANOTHER CRIME, in this case suborning perjury by instructing his former lawyer thug fixer Michael Cohen to lie to Congress. How many other people did he do that with? WE DUNNO! But that's not what this post is about.

First of all, let's see what the big guy himself did. As with all presidential statements from the un-president, it happened on Twitter:

Oh wait, that's (grapes) not it. Here it is:

That's right, the president of the United States reacted to a bombshell news report exposing that he had tampered with a witness by suborning perjury by ... tampering with that witness some more in public, by threatening his father-in-law! (To be fair, Trump has been trying to intimidate the witness by encouraging the feds to investigate Cohen's father-in-law for a hot minute now. It's one of his things, like tweeting and pooping at the same time and comparing WALL to WHEEL.)

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC
Donate

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

Newsletter

©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc