Donate

Poor, naive Chief Justice Roberts! How was he to know back in 2013 when he gutted the Voting Rights Act that state legislators would take it as a license to bring back those oldtimey Jim Crow laws? Who could have seen that one coming?

On June 25, 2013, Justice Roberts was the fifth vote in Shelby County v. Holder, overturning the requirement that states with a history of racist vote suppression must pre-clear any changes to their election laws with the Justice Department. In an amazing coincidence, on June 26, 2013, North Carolina's Republican legislators decided to embark on a sweeping overhaul of their state's voting laws.

Before enacting that law, the legislature requested data on the use, by race, of a number of voting practices. Upon receipt of the race data, the General Assembly enacted legislation that restricted voting and registration in five different ways, all of which disproportionately affected African Americans. [...]

Although the new provisions target African Americans with almost surgical precision, they constitute inapt remedies for the problems assertedly justifying them and, in fact, impose cures for problems that did not exist. Thus the asserted justifications cannot and do not conceal the State’s true motivation.

As Judge Diana Motz pointed out in the NAACP v. McRory, the 4th Circuit decision striking down the North Carolina law, the Republican legislators weren't exactly subtle.

Prior to Justice Roberts's gift to American voters in Shelby, black registration and turnout in North Carolina had almost reached parity with whites. Obama carried the state in 2008, and Romney barely squeaked out a win in 2012. But then Republican legislators got to work. If black voters wouldn't see reason and vote Republican, maybe it was because voting was just too easy!

There was no evidence of fraud by in-person voters, although there was a marginal degree of fraud in absentee ballots. But white people vote by mail! So the Republicans hunched over the demographic data and came up with this fine plan instead.

  1. Since African Americans are less likely to use drivers' licenses as ID, mandate that voters show photo ID issued by the DMV at the polls;
  2. Over 60% of black voters used early voting, as compared to about 46% of whites. So NC cut early voting from 17 days to 10. Bonus, one Sunday of Souls to the Polls voting is eliminated. Hallelujah!;
  3. Who needs same day registration to vote? Not North Carolinians!;
  4. After the Republican legislators noticed that African Americans were more likely to accidentally vote in the wrong precinct after a move, they remedied that problem by not counting those ballots.;
  5. And, just to spread the love around, North Carolina eliminated pre-registration for those uppity 16-year-olds.

The US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina found that there was no discriminatory intent in North Carolina's voting law. Oh, mah stahs and gahters, how could a person think such a thang? It was entirely coincidental that black turnout for early and primary voting declined 8.7% between 2012 and 2016.

In July of 2016, the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the law was clearly enacted with discriminatory intent. The fact that Republicans ordered up all that demographic data was a big tip off! Republican Governor Pat McRory pleaded with the Supreme Court to prettyplease let them disenfranchise black people protect the integrity of the ballot for the November election, but the Supreme Court refused to intervene. Donald Trump carried North Carolina, but voters gave poor Pat McRory the boot. Sad!

And then all hell broke loose in North Carolina! New Governor Roy Cooper and Attorney General Josh Stein, both Democrats, sought to withdraw the appeal of the 4th Circuit decision to the Supreme Court. The Republican General Assembly argued that they had the right to obtain private counsel to keep the case alive. And then the Speaker of the House decided to intervene personally to tell the Supreme Court how absolutely important it was for North Carolina to "protect the ballot!"

Today Justice Roberts brought the final hammer down on this episode of North Carolina's long running soap opera, The Black and the Voteless. The Supreme Court will not be hearing North Carolina's argument as to how they accidentally came up with a plan that disenfranchised black voters so well, which was never their intent. We have no idea which Justices wanted to hear North Carolina's appeal, but we know that at least five of them elected not to stick their noses into a steaming pile of racist horseshit. So, thank you Justice Roberts for going easy on us this morning, since this promises to be a crazy, nightmare week. Can we look forward to future non-crazy decisions from your Honor in the future? We hear that DC's wanton ways have ruined many a Republican Judicial appointee...

NICETIMES! We'll take 'em where we can get 'em!

[ Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 2 (2013) / NAACP v. McRory, No. 16-1468 (4th. Cir. 2016), Supreme Court Statement on denial of certiorari, North Carolina v. NAACP / Mortiz College of Law ]

Hey, we managed to give you a story that wasn't FUCKING DEPRESSING! No mean feat in the Trump era! Don't forget to tip your server.

Five Dollar Feminist

Your FDF lives in Baltimore under an assumed identity as an upstanding member of the PTA. Shhh, don't tell anyone she makes swears on the internet!

$
Donate with CC
Facebook video screenshot

Corey Stewart, the Minnesota transplant to Virginia who's made protecting "Confederate Heritage" a top issue in his campaign for the US Senate, accused a nosy New York Times reporter of breaking into the apartment of one of his aides. It's a terrific accusation, because while there's no evidence at all and the story makes no damn sense, that doesn't matter at all to people who'd vote for Corey Stewart. They already hate the evil media and know those nasty reporters are capable of all the depravity in the world.

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC

Hey, remember that hilarious time when Paul Ryan and Kevin McCarthy got caught on tape joking that LOL, Donald Trump and Congressman Dana Rohrabacher were totally on Putin's payroll? WaPo got the goods:

"There's two people I think Putin pays: Rohrabacher and Trump," McCarthy (R-Calif.) said, according to a recording of the June 15, 2016 exchange, which was listened to and verified by The Washington Post.

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher is a Californian Republican known in Congress as a fervent defender of Putin and Russia.House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) immediately interjected, stopping the conversation from further exploring McCarthy's assertion, and swore the Republicans present to secrecy.

It's funny 'cause it's true! ALLEGEDLY. Earlier this month, Congressman Lubyanka Rohrabacher told Fox reporter Elex Michaelson that DNC hack was obviously an inside job.

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC
Donate

SINGLE & MONTHLY DONATIONS

SUPPORT THE CAUSE - PAYPAL DONATION

PAYPAL RECURRING DONATIONS

©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc