Donate

We told you a while back about some of the fun distortions of American history that have made it into textbooks written to Texas's terrible history standards, but history isn't the only subject that goes off into rightwing fantasyland in Texas textbooks. The Washington Post brings us this review by Josh Rosenau, from the National Center for Science Education, who looks at how some of the books submitted for the Texas Board of Education's approval cover climate change. You may be astonished to learn that they aren't always the most accurate, science-wise! (Which is to say if you're actually astonished, you know nothing about Texas, or politics.)


Rosenau listened in on a meeting held by the Texas Education Association Monday to discuss the next phase in adopting or rejecting the submitted textbooks, and he teases us with the note that the first thing he heard when logging in to the online coverage was “I’d like a Biblical check on that,” but no, that wasn't a line about how Jesus will take care of the planet no matter how much crap we pump into the atmosphere -- it actually was part of an intense discussion of "whether to refer to the 'Torah' or the 'Covenant'" in a history text, darn it.

And while a lot of rightwing Christianists are fond of downplaying the reality of climate change, the textbooks don't quite go so far*; they're content to simply lie about the science. For instance, there's a fun "critical thinking" activity from a 6th-grade geography textbook: the "What Do You Think?" handouts from the teacher's edition ask students to decide which group of scientists are right: those who say climate change is caused by human activity, or those who say it's just part of a natural adjustment to the planet's ever-changing climate:

The text has a pro-reality statement from a section of the IPCC's 2007 climate report, and for the sake of balance, a couple of paragraphs from a pamphlet by climate change denialist group the Heartland Institute. Just teaching the controversy, after all. And really, who better to assess whether science is accurate than 6th-graders who have been given a pair of partial descriptions of the issue, one from a group of scientists, the other from an oil industry funded political group that got its start defending the tobacco industry from the slanted scientific claims that smoking caused cancer, then shifted to denying the reality of climate change? There are some pretty smart 6th-graders out there, after all. Maybe the textbook should have included the Heartland Institute's weird murder billboards, too.

Or maybe, says Rosenau, if textbooks wanted to have kids do some real critical thinking, they could acknowledge the reality of climate change and then debate issues growing out of that:

if the point is to give students a chance to debate a topic and explore the evidence, there are actually a lot of really interesting geography- or culture-related topics they could explore. As Alice Bell and Leigh Phillips explore at the Road to Paris web site, there are active controversies over how to address climate change, who should bear the costs of averting some climate change or preparing for its consequences, and what the best ways are to prepare. All of those touch centrally on the geography—political, economic, cultural, and physical—and cultures of today’s citizens, and of today’s students who will grow up to be tomorrow’s citizens.

Hahaha, that is a pretty silly suggestion, since Texas parents would complain that the textbooks are assuming scientists know what they are talking about. Maybe the kids should just memorize the names of world capitals instead.

* So yes, we have now bait-and-switched you, dear reader, just as Rosenau did for WaPo. The Circle of Trolling continues.

[WaPo / Image from "Museum of Idolatry"]

Doktor Zoom

Doktor Zoom's real name is Marty Kelley, and he lives in the wilds of Boise, Idaho. He is not a medical doctor, but does have a real PhD in Rhetoric. You should definitely donate some money to this little mommyblog where he has finally found acceptance and cat pictures. He is on maternity leave until 2033. Here is his Twitter, also. His quest to avoid prolixity is not going so great.

$
Donate with CC
Giphy

FINALLY. Of course, we say "finally," because we haven't been behind the scenes in the House Judiciary and Intelligence committees to witness the negotiating and wrangling firsthand, so we don't know what it's taken to make this happen, but clear your calendars for July 17, because Bobby Mueller is goin' to Congress!

Committee chairs Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler sent the letter late yesterday, accompanied by a subpoena, for Mueller to testify at 9 a.m. Eastern on July 17, which is a Wednesday, so you will presumably not be busy with brunch. The hearings for each committee will be back to back, after which members of Mueller's staff will meet with committee staff behind closed doors.

Schiff told Rachel Maddow last night that it should not be viewed as a friendly subpoena, because as we all know, Mueller has been very reluctant to become the star of the political circus this will surely create. However, he's gonna have to suck it up, because as we all saw after what happened when Mueller addressed the nation for 10 whole minutes, there is great value in actually having Mueller breathe life into his own work, for an American audience that hasn't read his 448-page report. (And we don't blame them/you! We probably wouldn't have read it all if it wasn't our job. It would probably be on our "list," like "someday I am going to watch 'The Sopranos' start to finish finally. And then I will read the Mueller Report!")

Point is, it needs to happen on live TV, where people can gather around at work and on the train and in the Fantastic Sams while they gets their hair did, and let this highly respected public servant tell the story of how America's most hostile enemy attacked the 2016 election in order to help Donald Trump, how the Trump campaign was positively orgasmic over that reacharound, and how Trump criminally obstructed the investigation into that hostile foreign attack at every turn.

And because Robert Mueller is a patriotic American who respects the rule of law and our institutions, he will be complying with the subpoena, because of fucking course he will.

Right off the bat, we have a couple of questions:

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC
Beds at the 'temporary' shelter in Homestead, Florida. US HHS photo.

The House of Representatives passed a $4.5 billion emergency bill to fund detention of undocumented immigrants and asylum seekers yesterday, but the bill's demands that government meet minimal standards of humane treatment led Donald Trump to threaten a veto, because no one puts cruelty in a corner. The bill passed largely along party lines, 230-195, with four progressive Democratic first-term representatives opposing it because they believed the machinery of the New Cruelty shouldn't get a single dollar more. Trump prefers a bill already passed by the Senate, which would provide a similar level of funding $4.6 billion), but lacks the House bill's crazy radical requirements that migrants be held in less horrifying conditions than have been reported in the last week.

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC
Donate

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

Newsletter

©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc