Photo: Customs and Border Protection

The Trump administration has an exciting new plan to free itself from the oppressive hand of judicial oversight: All it has to do is write some new regulations and then it can detain entire migrant families forever! But wait, you might say, doesn't that Flores settlement say migrant children can only be held by ICE 20 days, and then they have to be released to family members or a sponsor? Well, sure it does, but there's a beautiful catch that might allow the New Cruelty to do whatever Stephen Miller wants, just maybe. After all, being in power means you can never be held responsible, doesn't it?

The Center for Investigative Reporting has all the details in a report published last week. As always with the Trump administration and immigration, there are plenty of devils in those details, and as we often say, go read the whole thing. But the skinny is that the Department of Homeland Security, which handles immigrant detention, and the Department of Health and Human Services, which handles the care of migrant children once ICE has to release them, have submitted a pair of proposed regulations that would formally replace Flores. Here's the key rationale, from an abstract of the DHS's proposal to replace the 1997 Flores Settlement Agreement (FSA) with some nifty new rules:

The FSA was to terminate five years after the date of final court approval; however, the termination provisions were modified in 2001, such that the FSA does not terminate until forty-five days after publication of regulations implementing the agreement.

Basically, the administration is proposing to use the federal rule-making process to end the Flores settlement by supposedly enshrining the ruling in law. Ah, but here's where the beautiful catch is: The rules the feds want to put in place may actually gut the protections for migrant children and families that are currently safeguarded by Flores and by US District Judge Dolly Gee, who's in charge of overseeing the agreement. Yep, it's good old regulatory ratfucking in the finest Stephen Miller tradition.

The abstract insists this is all for the better, because the proposed rules would "codify the substantive terms of" Flores, and save taxpayers money by enabling

the U.S. Government to seek termination of the FSA and litigation concerning its enforcement. Through this rule, ICE will create a pathway to ensure the humane detention of family units while satisfying the goals of the FSA.

Translation: No more nosy federal judge telling the administration how detained kids have to be treated. Advocates for migrant families held a presser last Friday to warn the new rules could simply toss out many of the protections currently in place:

"The administration is planning its next step, which we believe will result in even more suffering and trauma for children," said Ai-jen Poo, a leader of the Families Belong Together Coalition. "By dismantling long-standing child protection under the Flores settlement agreement and implementing regulations in its place, the Trump administration is seeking to expand its power to jail families for longer in worse conditions and lock children indefinitely."

The rules haven't been formally submitted in the Federal Register yet, but that's expected to happen soon since the Office of Management and Budget recently completed its review of the regulations. Once they're published, there will be a public comment period, after which the government will ignore public input and finalize the rules however it damn well pleases. Then the lawsuits would begin.

So what the hell do DHS and HHS want to do, free of judicial interference? A draft of the proposed rule was leaked to the Washington Post in May, and it was a doozy. Among other things, the draft would allow detention of families until their cases are resolved in immigration court and allow the government to more quickly deport unaccompanied minor children by redefining "unaccompanied," a clever technicality that would leave language protecting unaccompanied kids in place but vastly reduce the number of kids who could benefit from those protections. Hell, it could even allow HHS facilities to feed kids less by redefining "emergency" exceptions to Flores's guidelines.

Diane Eikenberry, of the National Immigrant Justice Center, said in May, "They want more power to punish children and their families for seeking safety in the U.S." Well of course! If migrant families aren't treated like shit, people might still want to come here.

And let's not forget: This is all happening a month after the government blew right past another court's deadline to reunite over 500 children imprisoned during the horror of "zero tolerance" with their parents.

Flores is still a very active impediment to the Trump agenda of Deporting Everyone Including Maybe YOU. At the end of July, Judge Gee ruled the feds had violated the settlement by medicating migrant kids at the Shiloh Treatment Center in Manvel, Texas, without parental consent. Gee ordered the kids to be moved to less restrictive facilities and ordered significant changes in how medications were administered. As a preview of what the government might get away with if Flores is undone, the Center for Investigative Reporting published an update to the story yesterday, and it's pretty ugly: Court documents show kids are still being housed at Shiloh, and still being medicated without parental consent. A physician hired by the plaintiffs' attorneys, Dr. Amy Cohen, was at least allowed to visit, but Jesus Christ, just look at her assessment:

Cohen concluded that their treatment "continues to fall far short of both accepted mental health care standards and the 'risk of harm' and informed consent standards set out in the Court's order of July 30."

So that's the Trump administration's behavior with Flores in place. Just think what the bastards would try to get away with if they can junk it.

Yr Wonkette is fueled by reader donations and pure fury. Please click here to convert some of the latter into text.

[Reveal / WaPo / Reveal]

Doktor Zoom

Doktor Zoom's real name is Marty Kelley, and he lives in the wilds of Boise, Idaho. He is not a medical doctor, but does have a real PhD in Rhetoric. You should definitely donate some money to this little mommyblog where he has finally found acceptance and cat pictures. He is on maternity leave until 2033. Here is his Twitter, also. His quest to avoid prolixity is not going so great.

Donate with CC

Some of our favorite people to follow on Twitter are the wonderful folks who watch Fox News every night and tweet screenshots and videos, so that we never ever EVER have to watch it. (They all work for Media Matters, so presumably they are being forced to do this by David Brock.)

We had a feeling after Pete Buttigieg did that Fox News town hall, and after we watched the MENSA trust at "Fox & Friends" just lose it all morning about Buttigieg's open criticism of Fox News on Fox News, that the evening hosts would really deliver on Monday night, and boy was our feeling correct.

Let's go to the tape, provided by Media Matters deputy director of rapid response Andrew Lawrence.

Keep reading... Show less
Donate with CC
Wikimedia Commons

Today it was announced that Dress Barn would be closing all 650 of its stores and its business in general. This has been happening a lot lately, as people have begun to do most of their shopping online rather than in stores. Shopko, a department store chain, recently announced it would be closing all of its stores as well.

Then there's the mall store Charlotte Russe, which closed all of its stores in March. I actually worked there in high school, and at Contempo Casuals, which later became Wet Seal, and which closed all of its stores last January (though it's still online). Many other "mall stores" are also either closing entirely or closing a huge chunk of their stores.

Dress Barn was a terrible and oddly insulting-sounding name for a store. The fact that it survived for as long as it did with marketing that bad actually speaks very well for the store itself. If it were not doing an incredibly good job providing many women with what they wanted, clothing-wise, I do not think they would have survived this long. While I can't speak to that personally, since the last time I lived in an area that had one I was 14 years old (though I did get a very nice purple crushed velvet baby-doll dress there for my grandparent's anniversary when I was in 8th grade), a lot of people today are talking about how much they appreciated that they could get nice work clothes there for a reasonable price -- and also in a wide range of sizes. That's awesome. There should be more of that, not less.

But the real problem isn't just people losing a store they like. It's the fact that all of the people working at those 650 stores no longer have jobs–about 6,800 people in total. (And 18,000 employees are losing their jobs at Shopko, which often served towns of 3,000 to 5,000 people, too small for any other store where you could buy, say, socks and a toaster.) And the way things are going, it's going to be pretty hard for them to find jobs in the same line of work. The vast majority of these people, also, are women.

Keep reading... Show less
Donate with CC

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)


©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc