dc media

WashingtonPost.com Is Curious

February 04, 2004 08:15 AM

Not content with knowing readers' ages and Zip codes, the Washington Post's website will now ask "for a job title, a description of their primary responsibility, the size of their company and the industry in which they work. . . Users who provide Zip codes in the Washington area will also have to give their home address."

Questions WashingtonPost.com may ask you at some point in the future:

· Favorite color?

· Blood type?

· If you were a tree, what kind of tree would you be?

· Do you think you could edit Tina Brown's column for us?

· If you see Tony Kornheiser, could you please ask him to keep his voice down?

· Are you an important media professional? If so, Howie Kurtz would like to transcribe your thoughts and present them as "analysis." (Please take a number.)

· Hank Stuever needs a column idea. Free associate on a topic of your choosing. (Already taken: plastic chairs, not relating to what kids listen to these days, merino sweaters.)

· Are you a CIA operative? (We promise not to tell Bob Novak.)

· Seriously, will you please take a crack at the Tina column? We lost three of our best men on the Trump piece alone.

Post's Web Site Will Seek More Information on Visitors [WP via Romenesko]

wonkette

robert mueller robert mueller testifying robert mueller testimony robert mueller subpoena house judiciary committee house intelligence committee adam schiff jerry nadler mueller testimony july 17 rachel maddow robert mueller press conference mueller report trump donald trump trump russia conspiracy trump obstruction of justice robert mueller counter-intel findings bill barr bill barr cover-up artist trump russian intelligence asset house freedom caucus mark meadows louie gohmert jim jordan matt gaetz jay sekulow hannity lindsey graham trump twitter trump robert mueller trump mueller terminated the emails trump rape trump rape accusation trump fox business interview maria bartiromo trump iran

If It's What You Say, I Love Robert Mueller Testifying, Especially Later In The Summer!

Clear your calendars, we got a date with THE TRUTH!

Russia

Giphy

FINALLY. Of course, we say "finally," because we haven't been behind the scenes in the House Judiciary and Intelligence committees to witness the negotiating and wrangling firsthand, so we don't know what it's taken to make this happen, but clear your calendars for July 17, because Bobby Mueller is goin' to Congress!

Committee chairs Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler sent the letter late yesterday, accompanied by a subpoena, for Mueller to testify at 9 a.m. Eastern on July 17, which is a Wednesday, so you will presumably not be busy with brunch. The hearings for each committee will be back to back, after which members of Mueller's staff will meet with committee staff behind closed doors.

Schiff told Rachel Maddow last night that it should not be viewed as a friendly subpoena, because as we all know, Mueller has been very reluctant to become the star of the political circus this will surely create. However, he's gonna have to suck it up, because as we all saw after what happened when Mueller addressed the nation for 10 whole minutes, there is great value in actually having Mueller breathe life into his own work, for an American audience that hasn't read his 448-page report. (And we don't blame them/you! We probably wouldn't have read it all if it wasn't our job. It would probably be on our "list," like "someday I am going to watch 'The Sopranos' start to finish finally. And then I will read the Mueller Report!")

Point is, it needs to happen on live TV, where people can gather around at work and on the train and in the Fantastic Sams while they gets their hair did, and let this highly respected public servant tell the story of how America's most hostile enemy attacked the 2016 election in order to help Donald Trump, how the Trump campaign was positively orgasmic over that reacharound, and how Trump criminally obstructed the investigation into that hostile foreign attack at every turn.

And because Robert Mueller is a patriotic American who respects the rule of law and our institutions, he will be complying with the subpoena, because of fucking course he will.

Right off the bat, we have a couple of questions:

Keep reading... Show less

emergency border bill house of representatives undocumented migrants asylum seekers human rights department of health and human services office of refugee resettlement customs and border protection hhs cbp orr baby jails nita m. lowey pramila jayapal nancy pelosi central america el salvador guatemala. honduras foreign aid house progressive caucus alexandria ocasio-cortez ilhan omar ayanna pressley rashida tlaib house freedom caucus us senate veto threat immigration

Trump Probably Vetoing House Border Funding Bill, Because It Mandates The Babies Get 'Blankets' And 'Food'

The cruelty is the point.

Congress

Beds at the 'temporary' shelter in Homestead, Florida. US HHS photo.

The House of Representatives passed a $4.5 billion emergency bill to fund detention of undocumented immigrants and asylum seekers yesterday, but the bill's demands that government meet minimal standards of humane treatment led Donald Trump to threaten a veto, because no one puts cruelty in a corner. The bill passed largely along party lines, 230-195, with four progressive Democratic first-term representatives opposing it because they believed the machinery of the New Cruelty shouldn't get a single dollar more. Trump prefers a bill already passed by the Senate, which would provide a similar level of funding $4.6 billion), but lacks the House bill's crazy radical requirements that migrants be held in less horrifying conditions than have been reported in the last week.

Keep reading... Show less