We Have Always Been At War With The Womens


War is over if you want it ladiezWonkette is yr war correspondence headquarters! First we brought you hard-hitting coverage of  the war on Christmas. Now, we bring you  trenchant analysis of American's next great conflict: the war on marriage and men:

...I’ve spoken with hundreds, if not thousands, of men and women. And in doing so, I’ve accidentally stumbled upon a subculture of men who’ve told me, in no uncertain terms, that they’re never getting married. When I ask them why, the answer is always the same.

Women aren’t women anymore.

Ladies are not ladies! Men are still men, but they are sad menz who don't want to get married! This war is ON.

Why are the ladies not ladies? Take it away, perennial culture scold Suzanne Venker:

In a nutshell, women are angry. They’re also defensive, though often unknowingly. That’s because they’ve been raised to think of men as the enemy. Armed with this new attitude, women pushed men off their pedestal (women had their own pedestal, but feminists convinced them otherwise) and climbed up to take what they were taught to believe was rightfully theirs.

Now the men have nowhere to go. 

So...ladies had a pedestal, but it was not the same as the menz pedestal, but then ladies stole the menz pedestal and gave up their pedestal instead, but menz do not apparently want the lady pedestal.  Got it?

Sometimes war is senseless and tragic, dear readers.

Ms. Venker's credentials to provide coverage of our generation's VietNam are impeccable. She's the niece of O.G. cultural warrior Phyllis Schlafly. She has written no fewer than TWO DOZEN dispatches about this war for National Review alone. In short, she's the Edward R. Murrow of the battle of the sexes.

Not all news outlets respect Ms. Venker's expertise, however. Some call her delusional while others accuse her of strawmanning. Ms. Venker has addressed the concerns raised by lesser news sources and has now revised and extended her remarks to explain that sometimes she writes so darn much it is hard to keep track:

“I understand. All I can say in my defense is that it can be so hard when you write as much as I’ve written—three books, articles, blogs—you think you have said something but you haven’t. It’s like I am thinking something and I am so clear about it and I think what I have said is that. I don’t know. I don’t know. I didn’t think that much about it. It is an important distinction between men and husbands for sure.”

Marxist rag Daily Kos points out that this statement is a bit of a notpology:

So, in other words, she meant to say that wives suck, which is completely different, but she somehow ended up writing that women suck because when you've written three whole books—and you blog!—it's just way too much work to remember the difference between "men and women" and "husbands and wives." So all you haters out there who are mocking the crap out of Venker can just stop it right now because she didn't even mean it that way so there. 

Daily Kos is probably overrun by feminists who will never get married so we don't even know why Ms. Venker would talk to them. Ms Venker doesn't  just report the news. She offers us a way out of the madness of war:

Fortunately, there is good news: women have the power to turn everything around. All they have to do is surrender to their nature – their femininity – and let men surrender to theirs.

If they do, marriageable men will come out of the woodwork.

Let's recap. First, it is hard to remember what you write when you write many things! Next, women are pedestal-stealers and now men have nowhere to go, except that men have gone into the woodwork, but men will come out if the ladies will just surrender to their nature. 

War is hell, people. War. Is. Hell. 


Donate with CC

And now for some very serious TUT TUTTING! It's time again for Republicans to make sad words about President Treason McTraitorpants selling out the country. This time they are seriously concerned, nay even deeply troubled, that Donald Trump would stand next to Vladimir Putin and pretend the Russians didn't hack the 2016 election. These patriotic Republicans are shocked, SHOCKED! Well, not, like, upset enough to do anything about it -- not with a fascist carpooler to jam into the Supreme Court. But they've got tweets, so it's all good!

Keep reading... Show less
Donate with CC

Republicans are in a pickle. Midterms are coming up and the party in the White House usually loses seats in those elections. It doesn't help their chances that their guy Donald Trump frolics through fields holding hands with self-made Russian dictator and coincidental poisoner Vladimir Putin, who our own justice department believes attacked our mostly free elections and our true national monument, the Internet.

If you're as old as I am, you'll recall that back in the 1980s, the whole Republican brand involved not trusting the Ruskies, and they were especially disappointed when Kevin Costner turned out to be one in No Way Out. Now, the current Republican president is talking like some kind of crazy commie lib, bashing the FBI and giving the benefit of the doubt to a former KGB agent. During an interview Sunday where he wore a hat with "USA" in big letters on it, presumably so someone could easily return him if he got lost on the field trip, Trump went so far as to call the European Union a "foe" of his country, which if you believe his hat is supposedly the United States not Russia.

Keep reading... Show less
Donate with CC




©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc