Failed State

It might be time to send the United Nations, or at least Jimmy Carter and maybe Doctors Without Borders, to North Carolina, seeing as how a group of experts on measuring how well democracy functions in nations around the world has evaluated North Carolina's electoral system and found the state no longer has the essential features of a functioning democracy.

Andrew Reynolds, of the Electoral Integrity Project, briefly explains how he and his colleagues have developed tools that "measured 50 moving parts of an election process and covered everything from the legal framework to the polling day and counting of ballots," and applied them to studies of 213 elections in 153 countries; he says their methodology is "widely agreed to be the most accurate method for evaluating how free and fair and democratic elections are across time and place."

Reynolds says he never would have believed that applying the EIP's methodology to his home state would result in its electoral process receiving a score of 58 out of 100 points, earning it a place

alongside authoritarian states and pseudo-democracies like Cuba, Indonesia and Sierra Leone. If it were a nation state, North Carolina would rank right in the middle of the global league table – a deeply flawed, partly free democracy that is only slightly ahead of the failed democracies that constitute much of the developing world.

Congratulations, North Carolina! Perhaps someday you can hope to score as well on voter registration as, say, Rwanda, which gets a whopping 84 points, or an overall score as good as Tunisia's (74 points -- the best in Africa). As it is, you're just barely ahead of Kenya, Mauritania, Algeria, and Burkina Faso. There's a slogan for your license plates! "North Carolina: Slightly More Democratic Than Burkina Faso."

Oh, but in some aspects of functional democracy, North Carolina actually ranks worse than any country on Earth, which ought to be a matter of pride for the state lege:

Indeed, North Carolina does so poorly on the measures of legal framework and voter registration, that on those indicators we rank alongside Iran and Venezuela. When it comes to the integrity of the voting district boundaries no country has ever received as low a score as the 7/100 North Carolina received. North Carolina is not only the worst state in the USA for unfair districting but the worst entity in the world ever analyzed by the Electoral Integrity Project.

Damn. And most states are satisfied if they're doing better than Mississippi! At least the Justice Department told North Carolina to get its redistricting act together.

Chief among North Carolina's problems with representative democracy is that while Republicans win a little over half the statewide votes, that translates into nearly 100% of the legislative power:

The GOP has a huge legislative majority giving it absolute veto-proof control with that tiny advantage in the popular vote. The other party wins just a handful of votes less and 0 percent of the legislative power.

And then there's Amendment 2, the transgender potty law, which remains in effect after this week's legislative bait-and-switch special session. That, plus the suppression of African American and Latino voting rights, wins you another low score for democratic autonomy.

Let's also not forget that fun little trick where, after Republican Pat McCrory finally admitted he'd lost the governorship to Democrat Roy Cooper, the Republican legislature and lame duck governor worked to diminish the incoming Democratic governor's executive powers. This is definitely the sort of thing Reynolds knows well from banana republics:

When, in response to losing the governorship, one party uses its legislative dominance to take away significant executive power, it is a direct attack upon the separation of powers that defines American democracy. When a wounded legislative leadership, and a lame-duck executive, force through draconian changes with no time for robust review and debate it leaves Carolina no better than the authoritarian regimes we look down upon.

So, how to fix it? Start with the simplest of democratic principles: Admit that one party can't have all the power all the time. If it's bad for Zimbabwe or China, it's bad for North Carolina, too. Take the drawing of legislative districts away from the single-party-dominated state legislature and give it to an independent commission (even a conservative bastion like Arizona can handle that!) And respect the will of the voters, for godssake. If you lose an election, you don't get to rewrite all the rules so the new guys have to ask the old guys "Mother may I" before appointing a cabinet.

Keep working on democracy, North Carolina! Before you know it, you'll be right up there in the 60 to 70 range with Cameroon, Sierra Leone, and Namibia!

[News & Observer / Electoral Integrity Project / Electoral Integrity in Africa (PDF file)]

Doktor Zoom

Doktor Zoom's real name is Marty Kelley, and he lives in the wilds of Boise, Idaho. He is not a medical doctor, but does have a real PhD in Rhetoric. You should definitely donate some money to this little mommyblog where he has finally found acceptance and cat pictures. He is on maternity leave until 2033. Here is his Twitter, also. His quest to avoid prolixity is not going so great.

Donate with CC

Nancy Pelosi is making news again today after her weekly press conference, mostly because she said this about yesterday's nutbag performance from President Stable Genius:

[T]his time, another temper tantrum — again — I pray for the President Of The United States. I wish him and his family, his administration and staff would have an intervention for the good of the country.

She prays for him. And she's just kind of suggesting that maybe the president is unwell, in his brain. She's being very subtle!

When Glenn Thrush asked afterward what kind of "intervention" she might be talking about, she suggested that Article 25 would be just fine.

But many folks out there right now are saying "BUT WHAT ABOUT INPEACH! They are not going to do an intervention, because the intervention is called INPEACH!" (They are taking her words very literally, it would seem.) Every other damn day lately, there is news about how "NANCY SAID INPEACH IS BAD" or "NANCY SAID TRUMP'S ACTIONS IS SELF-INPEACH-ATORY, WHAT DOES THAT EVEN MEAN, NANCY!" and whatever else, we don't know, because we have muted all of Twitter until further notice. (Here is some news about the House Democrats' weekly meeting yesterday, most of which was about Democrats yelling INPEACH! while Nancy Pelosi gave them cold showers.)

Here's the thing:

In today's presser, Pelosi was clearer than ever about her feelings on impeachment -- she doesn't like it, and she'd really hate for the nation to get to a place where that's inevitable, she is just saying it would be truly terrible for them to have to do that -- but they might just be FORCED to go there. And wouldn't that be just terrible? Nancy Pelosi is praying about that just like she is praying for Trump, under a big oak tree that casts all the shade she threw at Donald Trump for her entire fucking presser.

Keep reading... Show less
Donate with CC

Happy Throwback Thursday! Remember Paul Manafort? He's still in jail, don't worry. But it looks like he might be getting some company soon from his old pal Stephen Calk, who just got indicted today by the Southern District of New York.

Calk was a simple CEO and COB at the Federal Savings Bank of Chicago, but he had big dreams. He'd been an army pilot and a money guy, so he figured he was competent to be either Secretary of Treasury or Secretary of Army. He'd take Commerce or HUD, or even a cool ambassadorship to France, or the UK, or the UN -- he wasn't picky. Just any old position befitting a guy who is 100 percent going to be played by Michael McKean in the movie version of this nightmare.

Luckily Calk knew a guy on the inside. Sure that guy had recently been You're Fired from the Trump campaign for ratfucking the Ukrainian election, but Paul Manafort was still waving his bits all over Trumpland in the summer and fall of 2016, so Paul Manafort had the hookup that Calk needed. Luckily, Calk had what Manafort needed, which was MONEY. Manafort's fountain of untaxed cash had dried up since the Ukrainians gave his guy Viktor Yanukovych the boot, and he was in danger of losing multiple investment properties to foreclosure. So naturally Calk stepped up to the plate with $15 million in loans to keep the wolves at bay, because what are friends with more political ambition than scruple for, right?

Keep reading... Show less
Donate with CC

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)


©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc