Donate

HE SEEMS NICE.


I AIN'T SAYIN' HE A GOLD DIGGER. But he ain't messing with no divorce settlement of less than $100,000 for every month they were married!

Okay, $93,750. But that is Congressman Mike Turner's final offer!

Ohio Rep. Mike Turner (R-Family Values) is getting divorced for the second time in five years, and this time he's going out in style. No dignified division of property in some boring lawyer's office for Turner and his estranged wife Majida Mourad. When you get divorced from an energy lobbyist, no expense should be spared! Also, no humiliation! Which is why Turner gave his buddy Darrell Issa (R-Never Convicted) a hand-delivered invitation to testify in the divorce proceedings.

Politico reports,

Turner (R-Ohio) approached Issa (R-Calif.) in the Capitol last week and handed him a letter seeking a deposition as part of his divorce proceedings, according to multiple sources with knowledge of the interaction.

It's unclear why Turner would seek Issa's testimony. Mourad's attorney, Sanford Ain, said in a statement Monday that Turner "may have" told "third parties" that she was unfaithful, "thinking it would advantage him in the divorce." But any claim of infidelity by Mourad "has no basis in fact," Ain said.

HE SEEMS NICE. Whether Issa will testify from his own, ummmm ... personal knowledge of Ms. Mourad's fidelity or just repeat smack that Turner talked about his own wife is not clear. Issa, who was a groomsman in their wedding, has been friends with Mourad for decades and denies any improper relationship.

Turner is suing Mourad for "fraudulent contract," one of the permitted causes for divorce in Ohio, and seeking a $1.5 million settlement. Which seems like a lot for a second marriage that lasted less than 18 months. Particularly when the marital home is a $210,000 condo in Dayton purchased by Mourad before her brief fling with holy matrimony.

But Ohio courts divide money earned during marriage evenly between the partners. We are not a divorce lawyer, but if Mourad took home roughly $2.1 million per year, then Turner's share would be approximately $1.5 million from the 17 months of their marriage. Per Politico,

In the past nine months, Turner has been tussling with Mourad over the disclosure of her assets. Mourad has sought to keep secret the details of a stock agreement with Tellurian Inc, a Houston-based natural gas company for which she serves as a lobbyist. Mourad is significantly wealthier than Turner: She is worth between $2.8 million and $9.8 million, while Turner is worth between $156,000 and $744,000, according to financial disclosure reports the couple filed with the House clerk’s office.

Is she playing hardball on the value of her stock options? Is he trying to gain leverage by dragging her name through the mud? Why does he want to put Darrell Issa on the stand? And have these idiots never heard of a pre-nup?

ALSO, WHO THE HELL ARE THESE PEOPLE TO PREACH TO THE REST OF US ABOUT FAMILY VALUES?

Tacky, tacky, tacky.

Follow your FDF on Twitter.

Please donate to Wonkette! We promise to love and cherish you forever!

[Politico / Dayton Daily News]

Five Dollar Feminist

Your FDF lives in Baltimore under an assumed identity as an upstanding member of the PTA. Shhh, don't tell anyone she makes swears on the internet!

$
Donate with CC
Photo: Desmog Blog

The Washington Post reports the Trump administration is on the verge of forming a panel to reconsider the Pentagon and Intelligence community assessment that climate change poses a serious concern for national security. The idea that climate is a national security concern is hardly crazy -- the Pentagon has been warning about the implications of climate change for national defense since the 1990s, and by 2010, the Defense Department was urging that climate change should be considered a major force of destabilization around the world. Hungry people whose crops have dried up may get violent, you know? Or at least pick up and move elsewhere, where they may not be welcome. Similarly, the CIA in 2008 tried to assess the likely effects of climate change on security through 2030.

Of course, now that President ScienceBrain is in office, that's all in the trash, at least in the Oval Office. And this new effort to set up a "Presidential Committee on Climate Security" through an executive order has the potential to erase considerations of climate from national security planning, because the "president" doesn't believe it, and has surrounded himself with other great intellects who reject science too. And hoo boy, get a load of the guy in charge of the whole shebang: William Happer, a laser expert who worked on Reagan's Star Wars antimissile program and, not surprisingly, is not a climate scientist. Instead, he argues that we need a lot more CO2 in the atmosphere, because it's what plants crave.

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC

Morning Wonketariat! Here's some of the things we may be talking about today.

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC
Donate

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

Newsletter

©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc