Donate

ByBilly HathornMiddlebrow corporate chain restaurant Ruby Tuesday is being sued for making servers work for slave wages. Oops, sorry, we meant to say: Ruby Tuesday is being sued for making servers work for slave wages with slightly higher frequency than is perfectly legal under US law.


Wait, What Now?

A class action lawsuit filed on behalf of every single server and bartender who worked at Ruby Tuesday in the last three years claims that Ruby Tuesday violated the law by paying servers the sub-minimum wage. While normally, restaurants are allowed to pay servers the shitty, regressive, no-good, very bad sub-minimum wage, it turns out there's some fine print Ruby Tuesday should've looked up. See, what restaurants aren't allowed to do is make servers spend too much of their time on the clock doing side work, and Ruby Tuesday, well, they done been naughty boys and girls.

Wait, What Is This 'Side Work' You're Talking About? You Mean Like Dealing Drugs Out The Back Of The Restaurant?

No, typically we would refer to that as "finding a way to pay rent." Side work is completely unrelated to illicit narcotics deals: it's work servers have to do that is unrelated to serving, and it's typically done after they're done taking tables but before they're allowed to leave. As far as what constitutes side work, rolling or wrapping silverware is the most common activity, but it's far from the only one. A by-no-means-complete list of various activities it can include (and bear in mind that depending on the restaurant, it can often include many of these at once) can be found here.

"Wait," you might say. "Aren't servers paid $2.13/hour in most states because tips are supposed to make up the difference? And they can't be getting tips while doing side work, so ... aren't they working for a flat $2.13 per hour at that point? That sounds really brutally unfair and awful." Congratulations! You are more morally sound than the idiot lawmakers who allowed the tipped sub-minimum wage to ever happen. We wouldn't get too excited by this -- goldfish have more moral fiber than many of the people legislating wage law -- but it's true all the same.

Here's the point where plutocrat apologists love to claim that if the servers aren't making minimum wage, the restaurant has to make up the difference, so no harm no foul. Then they smirk so hard they become punchier than Ted Cruz, and that shouldn't be physically possible.

Except, this is complete crap. See, pay isn't calculated separately for each and every hour. As long as the server's overall earnings add up to the minimum wage over their entire pay period, they can be forced to clean the inside of the nasty soda fountain, take out the garbage, or do battle with the magical ketchup cow for an hour for free before they're allowed to go home to their hovels.

There is one rule relating to side work, however: restaurants in states with a sub-minimum wage (remember, eight of them don't have one) can't force employees to spend more than 20 percent of their time on the clock doing side work, and it's this rule Ruby Tuesday's is accused of running afoul of.

We believe the accusations, too. Many, many, many, many, MANY restaurants make servers work more than 20 percent of their time doing side work. The vast majority of them get away with it largely because servers either don't know the law or accept it as a standard part of the job. If everyone is committing a crime, why would anyone think it's illegal? At that point, it's just an unavoidable part of reality.

So Ruby Tuesday Is Taking The Decent Approach And Admitting Wrongdoing While Settling With The Servers, Right?

Hahahahahaha, oh, how we laugh. Ruby Tuesday's is refusing to back down:

Ruby Tuesday denies the charges, and in a statement says it looks forward to its day in court, where lawyers "will be providing a vigorous defense of the company on this matter."

Either that's posturing in preparation for a settlement, or Ruby Tuesday's might want to rethink that. It's incredibly rare for a court not to side with the plaintiffs in excessive side work cases -- if the companies in question aren't smart enough to settle first. Darden, the slave-labor-sourcing Snidely Whiplash of the restaurant industry, has actually been one of the aforementioned companies too stupid to settle, and have paid a price for it.

We kind of hope they don't, though. Seeing Ruby Tuesday have to pay through the nose for all the wages they've stolen from workers over the last three years would in some small part make up for all the times we had to go there as a kid and eat from that damn salad bar.

[GrubStreet]

$
Donate with CC
NYT video screenshot

The New York Times this weekend brought us a case study of how Donald Trump's family separation policy tore apart just one family last year, although this particular example is notable because it involves the youngest child known -- so far -- to have been taken from his parents at the US-Mexico border. Little Constantin Mutu was just four months old when he was taken from his father, Vasile, a Romanian seeking asylum in the USA, having believed all that outdated crap about the Statue of Liberty being the "Mother of Exiles." What a sap! We're not letting those tempest-tossed takers push US around any more!

Constantin was taken from his dad in February of 2018, a good two months before the Trump administration officially announced the family separation policy -- but which we now know had been operating covertly since the summer of 2017 before it was expanded last year. Vasile and Florentina Mutu, members of the Roma ethnic minority, came to the US seeking asylum after Florentina found out that when she'd had a C-section while giving birth to Constantin, the doctors had also sterilized her without her knowing it. She said she was handed papers while she was foggy from the pain of labor, and had no idea what she was signing, and reporter Caitlin Dickerson notes "human rights groups have documented the practice of forced sterilizations" of Roma elsewhere in Europe.

And the Mutus had heard all sorts of wonderful things about America, too. They made a living by leaving their village and begging or doing short-term labor around Europe, then going home, where life was less expensive, but some people from their village had reputedly gone to the US and become rich, although maybe those stories were exaggerated. Still,

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC

Spinal Tap - Gimme Some Money

Some dick is suing your Wonkette! If you are able, will you please send money?

1. Pick "just once" or "monthly."

2. Pick an amount, like say "all of the money."

3. Click "paypal" if you are paypal or "stripe" if you are not paypal.

4. MONEY.

5. Carry on with your day, and with new posts below!

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

$
Donate with CC
Donate

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

Newsletter

©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc