Guy who watches TV all day wants work requirements for healthcare

The Trump administration has rolled out a great new idea to allow states to impose work requirements on able-bodied Medicaid recipients. For 50 years, Medicaid has been treated primarily as a healthcare program that helps low-income people, but now the administration is officially enshrining the Republican view that it's just one more form of welfare for greedy takers who just need a good shaming to make them stop being poor.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) sent a 10-page letter to state Medicaid directors giving them authorization to make receiving Medicaid benefits conditional on having a job, being in school or a job-training program, proving they're a caregiver for someone, or taking part in some other "community engagement" approved by the state. Now, before you get all "ARE THEY GONNA MAKE NURSING HOME RESIDENTS WORK IN COAL MINES," the letter is quite clear that states can only throw people off healthcare for not working if they're "non-elderly, non-pregnant adult Medicaid beneficiaries who are eligible for Medicaid on a basis other than disability." So relax! Sending Meemaw to the coal mines is Phase III, and won't even be considered until CHIP reauthorization is made conditional on the repeal of child labor laws.

As many as 10 states are already waiting for federal approval to impose work requirements on Medicaid recipients, and another three are mulling it over. The first waiver, probably for Kentucky, could get the go-ahead by Friday, according to sources who spoke to the Washington Post.

For what little it's worth, the Post notes,

[Most] health policy experts, including a few noted conservatives, have regarded the government insurance enabling millions of people to afford medical care as a right that should not hinge on individuals’ compliance with other rules.

So much for that shit. While this isn't a national work requirement, it's definitely an invitation to red states to start tossing up creative roadblocks to low-income adults who need medical care. Because, you know, work is a very good thing, and it probably just hadn't occurred to most poor people that maybe they should get a job instead of sitting around all the time. When CMS director Seema Verba was sworn in back in March of last year, she sent a letter to governors soliciting "innovations that build on the human dignity that comes with training, employment and independence." Lord knows these bastards are fairly bursting with ideas to make people in poverty more dignified, the slobs.

The CMS letter perversely harnesses data showing that people with productive employment are healthier and live longer into the service of a plan to take away people's healthcare if they fail to get steady work:

Maybe Michael Wolff has it wrong in that book Donald Trump Is A Tire Fire -- looks like confusing causes and effects isn't a problem that's limited to Donald Trump. You know what all those studies really indicate? They show that not being poor is good for your health, not that people who are forced to jump through more and more hoops to get healthcare are healthier. Still, maybe we could borrow a line from their rationale there: Since it's widely recognized that education can lead to improved health, how about we make community college tuition waivers available to anyone who qualifies for Medicaid? It's a thought.

Fortunately, critics of the plan are already planning lawsuits. Leonard Cuello, the health policy director at the National Health Law Program, told WaPo, "It’s not a good idea, and it’s illegal."

Cuello said the argument that work promotes health is “totally contorted . . . It’s a little like saying that rain causes clouds. It’s more that people [with Medicaid] get care, which helps them be healthy and makes them able to work.”

What kind of bizarro liberal logic is that? Next you'll be saying that tax cuts for the rich won't increase middle-class employment!

The "you gotta work" argument is especially evil because most people receiving Medicaid are already working, according to a December 2017 study by the Kaiser Family Foundation. 60 percent of adults receiving Medicaid work, and nearly 80 percent are in a family where at least one person is working. Workers on Medicaid tend -- obviously -- to be employed in low-wage jobs in which they still make so little that they still qualify for assistance, even if they work full-time. Their employers almost never offer work-based health insurance, because isn't that what Medicaid's for? And, not surprisingly, the rate of working adults on Medicaid is much higher in the South, home of "right to work" laws, hooray.

Of the 40 percent who aren't employed, the study also found most faced "major impediments" to employment. This shit's important, so we hope you won't mind if we copy-paste the overview here:

The suggested guidelines would allow exemptions from work requirements for many of the folks who aren't currently working, such as caregivers, people in school, or people with disabilities, but the catch is that those exemptions would be determined at a state level, using the guidelines states already use for eligibility in other programs with work requirements, like Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) -- aka food stamps.

As the KFF study argues, throwing up more administrative barriers to people getting healthcare isn't likely to be good for anyone. Applicants who would be otherwise eligible may have trouble meeting the new paperwork requirements for proof of employment (or of a qualifying exemption). It will also add to costs for the states, since they'll be adding a new layer of bureaucracy to screen Medicaid recipients.

And if most people currently getting Medicaid are already working, or seem to have a good reason not to be working (which may win them an exemption from the work requirement), then why the hell is a work requirement needed in the first goddamn place? That's simple: You gotta tighten the screws on poor people, because no matter what the reality is, Republicans just know life in poverty is an endless funtimes parade of free stuff. The goal here is to add more barriers to people living the high life on Medicaid, and the result will be fewer people getting the medical care that really can improve their job prospects. Topher Spiro, of the Center for American Progress, sums up the rationale in this excellent Twitter thread:

A 2016 study by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities found that, for programs like TANF and SNAP, imposing work requirements didn't actually improve employment among poor people.

The exception: programs that didn't just require looking for work or showing proof of employment, but which improved education and good job-skills training. The best such programs actually did help more people escape poverty. But those cost money, so Medicaid told states they can't use Medicaid funds to pay for them. (Though Maine Governor Paul LePage can use TANF funds for Christian after-school programs.) Why would we want to shower even more benefits on the poors when they're already living it up with their refrigerators and color TVs and Obamaphones?

In totally unrelated news, President Donald Trump's work day today begins at 1:30 p.m. Eastern.

[WaPo / Kaiser Family Foundation / Center on Budget and Policy Priorities / Topher Spiro on Twitter]

Wonkette is ad-free, independent, and thanks to READERS LIKE YOU is able to provide health care AND a livable wage. Please help us help us!

Doktor Zoom

Doktor Zoom's real name is Marty Kelley, and he lives in the wilds of Boise, Idaho. He is not a medical doctor, but does have a real PhD in Rhetoric. You should definitely donate some money to this little mommyblog where he has finally found acceptance and cat pictures. He is on maternity leave until 2033. Here is his Twitter, also. His quest to avoid prolixity is not going so great.

Donate with CC

Once upon a time... about ten years ago, a group of entirely ridiculous men burst onto the scene wearing stupid hats and telling men that wearing stupid hats and telling men that walking up to women in bars and insulting ("negging") them would get them laid. This did not last long, as women also had televisions and computers and were completely aware of these tricks as well, so when some ass came up to us in a bar and said "Hey, nice nails, are they real?" we would laugh and laugh and loudly announce "Oh my god, this guy just tried to neg me! Can you believe that shit? HEY EVERYONE, THIS GUY JUST TRIED TO NEG ME!" and then refer to him as "Mystery" the whole night.

Most of the men who tried that shit only did so a few times before realizing that it wasn't going to work, and thus moved on to other things. Perhaps things that did not involve furry hats and coming off as a huge creep. We may never know, because I would assume that those who tried it are now extremely embarrassed and would never, ever admit to this to us.

Still, there were a few men willing to eat that shit up, as well as some grifters willing to take advantage of that. Said grifters tended to be extremely misogynistic and seemed more like they were teaching men how to be as despised by women as they were than teaching them how to actually be liked by women.

Some of them, like Roosh V, a creepy weirdo who actually does live in his mom's basement, actively encouraged men to rape women who were intoxicated to the point of being obviously unable to consent.

However, even that branch of the PUA tree is wilting away. Many "self-help" style PUA forums like Nextasf and RSDnation are shutting down or have already shut down. In March, Chateau Heartiste, a batshit crazy PUA turned White Nationalist/Alt-Right blog was shut down by Wordpress. This week, rape advocate Roosh V (whom you may recall once called yours truly a "Wonkette typist/clown face, would not bang") announced that he was renouncing his PUA ways and devoting himself to Jesus. He explained to the forum he manages that he would no longer be allowing anyone to discuss premarital "fornication."

Keep reading... Show less
Donate with CC

'Baby Geniuses' star Jon Voight took to Twitter early this morning to proclaim his undying love for Donald Trump, probably because there is no one left in his life who will listen to him talk about this, or anything else, in person. In this video rant, Voight encouraged members of the Republican Party, whom he apparently thinks are the only real citizens of the United States, to stand by Donald Trump and "acknowledge the truth" that he is the best President since Abraham Lincoln.

Part ONE:

People of the Republican Party, I know you will agree with me when I say our president has our utmost respect and our love. This job is not easy. For he's battling the left and their absurd words of destruction. I've said this once and I'll say this again. That our nation has been built on the solid ground from our forefathers, and there is a moral code of duty that has been passed on from President Lincoln. I'm here today to acknowledge the truth, and I'm here today to tell you my fellow Americans that our country…

Oh no, not our absurd words of destruction!

Part DEUX:

is stronger, safer, and with more jobs because our President has made his every move correct. Don't be fooled by the political left, because we are the people of this nation that is witnessing triumph. So let us stand with our president. Let us stand up for this truth, that President Trump is the greatest president since President Lincoln.

Does Jon Voight not know there have been... other presidents? Can he name them? Because really, it does not sound like it. Does he also not know that a very big chunk of the Republican Party actually does not care very much for Abraham Lincoln? Namely those defenders of Confederate statues that Trump called "very fine people?" Also, did he intentionally diss their beloved Ronald Reagan?

Who can know? Who can even tell what he is trying to say or why he is trying to say it. He doesn't appear to have tweeted much since 2016, so I'm guessing whoever's job it was to keep him from tanking his career quit. Either that... or after filming the seventh season of Ray Donovan, he found out it's going to be canceled or his character is getting killed off or something and he is now free to be a jackass? I don't know, I haven't watched the show, although my parents are very into it and mad that I haven't watched it. Literally all I know about it is that it has something to do with Boston, because they keep mentioning that to me like it's a selling point.

It seems useless at this point to note that the people who scream their faces off about how bad it is for Hollywood celebs to support liberal causes, and how they should keep their politics to themselves, etc. etc. make a way bigger deal than normal people do whenever a Big Time Hollywood Celebrity like Jon Voight or, uh, Scott Baio, supports their cause. Mostly because they're the only ones who have elected a reality TV star and the star of Bedtime for Bonzo (who by the way, also once practically ruined a perfectly good Bette Davis movie with his bad acting. Which is not to say that Dark Victory is not fantastic and probably the best thing to watch if you want to sob your face off, but he was very bad in it.) to run the country.

But we might as well do that anyway, because it actually never stops being funny.

[Jon Voight Twitter]

Donate with CC

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)


©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc