Donate

He reckons he can't answer your questions.


Great news! Attorney General Jeff Sessions will be publicly testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday afternoon! Now we will finally know the truth about the Trump-Russia investigation and Sessions's role in the firing of FBI director James Comey, because Jeff Sessions has a real good track record of being honest with Senate committees these days, especially where the word "Russia" is involved. So ... hooray! Jeff Sessions! ALL THE TRUTH-TELLING!

Oh wait:

Oh that is some horseshit. He's going to invoke executive privilege when it comes to questions about how he and Donald Trump colluded to fire James Comey for investigating Trump's Russian ties, an investigation Sessions is supposedly recused from.

During James Comey's explosive testimony on Thursday, he planted a surprise truth-bomb about how he never told Sessions about Trump's inappropriate, justice-obstructing advances on him, because all the higher-ups he consulted with back in February agreed Sessions was probably about to have to recuse himself from the Russia investigation anyway, because they knew things that would make his continued involvement "problematic." Secret things. Classified things.

After Comey's open hearing, he went for a private session with the Senate Intel Committee, where he reportedly told them about ANOTHER meeting with the Russian ambassador that Sessions may have failed to disclose (this meeting maybe?), on top of the other meetings he failed to disclose in his confirmation hearings. Within about eight seconds after the conclusion of that session, the Senate Intel Committee was like "GET THAT ALABAMA CRACKER OVER HERE, WE WANNA TALK TO HIM." Initially it was expected that he would testify in a closed session, but suddenly the Justice Department notified the committee that Sessions was just DYING to do an open hearing, because he really felt like he should clear the air with the American people:

"The Attorney General has requested that this hearing be public. He believes it is important for the American people to hear the truth directly from him and looks forward to answering the committee's questions tomorrow," said the department's Sarah Isgur Flores, in a statement relayed by NPR's Carrie Johnson.

Apparently he will be clearing the air by saying "No comment" and "WHOA IF TRUE but I reckon I cain't talk about that" and "SHHHH, BE VEWY VEWY QUIET, I AM HUNTING WABBITS!" Sounds just fucking great.

Josh Marshall at Talking Points Memo thinks this is a big fuckin' deal, considering Comey's little whispers to the nation on Thursday about how Sessions might be G-U-I-L-T-Y:

Comey seems to have quite intentionally revealed information that the Senators did not yet know and just as intentionally revealed the existence of that information to the public. [...]

The obvious question arises: what did Comey’s team know two weeks prior to Sessions’ surprise recusal?

In his public testimony Comey went considerably further. Again, the key quote: “Our judgment, as I recall, is that he was very close to and inevitably going to recuse himself for a variety of reasons. We also were aware of facts that I can’t discuss in an opening setting that would make his continued engagement in a Russia-related investigation problematic. So we were convinced — in fact, I think we’d already heard the career people were recommending that he recuse himself, that he was not going to be in contact with Russia-related matters much longer. That turned out to be the case."

This involves some inference and speculation. But it seems clear to me that Comey was revealing things that were not at all necessary to answer the question at hand, much as he had in his prepared testimony.  [...]

Whatever the information is ... It sounds like something that seriously compromises Sessions’ role with a Russia probe and that Comey felt it was important to get out.

The hearing has been scheduled for 2:30 PM Eastern, which is a different time if you live in other time zones. Will we be liveblogging? MAYBE PROBABLY WE GUESS. So be here!

Wonkette is fully funded by readers like YOU. If you love us, click below, to fund us!

[CNN / NPR / Talking Points Memo]

Evan Hurst

Evan Hurst is the senior editor of Wonkette, which means he is the boss of you, unless you are Rebecca, who is boss of him. His dog Lula is judging you right now.

Follow him on Twitter RIGHT HERE.

$
Donate with CC
Yeah, that's my daughter and I made this

Guys!

Last

month

was

crazy!

First, NASA sent its last message to the Mars Opportunity rover! THEN scientists said that all the insects are dying but not the human-looking ones in the GOP. As if THAT wasn't enough, some brave pendejos with grandes cojones are going to try and get seafloor creatures from under a giant ice shelf in the ANTARCTIC!

So, yeah, all three of those stories happened last month. Let's cover each in a science lightning round.

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos is terrible at her job. Her objectives and overall mission are evil, but if it's any consolation she can't effectively implement them. After buying her Cabinet position at Sotheby's, DeVos has spent the past two years trying to roll back Obama-era policies designed to protect and actually educate students. Unfortunately for her evil schemes, federal courts keep smacking down her slimy efforts. It's getting embarrassing.

DeVos recently had to cancel $150 million in student loan debt after courts said her attempts to stop the "borrow defense" regulations from taking effect were in fact illegal. Last week, she was forced to instruct colleges to follow the Obama rule barring mandatory arbitration agreements. She got kicked in the teeth earlier this month when a federal judge ruled she'd acted illegally ... again. This time, DeVos tried to delay an Obama-era guideline that required states to address racial disparities in their special education programs. Judge Tanya S. Chutkan called the delay "arbitrary" and "capricious."

The rule, drafted under the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, would require states to identify districts with "significant disproportionality" in the number of minority students channeled into special education services, segregated in restrictive classroom settings or disciplined.

OK, so what was the "education" secretary's issue with this rule? We want to imagine there's some rationale we're not seeing and DeVos is more than just some yacht-collecting monster.

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC
Donate

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

Newsletter

©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc