Donate

Fuck it! We'll do it with lies!


Fired Fox News Voice O' Truth Bill O'Reilly is having a rough day, the poor fellow. Tuesday, a federal judge in a defamation suit against O'Reilly -- brought by women with whom he'd settled harassment cases, and then later accused of being part of a liberal plot to make him look bad -- ruled that details of those previous settlements can't be kept secret because they're material to the defamation suit. Judge Deborah Batts said in her ruling that O'Reilly

"has failed to present compelling countervailing factors that could overcome the presumption of public access" to the agreements.

Batts also said O'Reilly "has not even come close to rebutting this First Amendment presumption" that favors public access to documents.

Batts pointed out that if O'Reilly was going to argue the settlements were proof he hadn't defamed the women, he couldn't very well ask the court to keep those very documents "from public view." As WaPo's Erik Wemple notes,

Any consideration of O’Reilly’s motions, wrote Batts, “relies heavily on a full examination of the Settlement and Arbitration Agreements in question.” There’s a need for the court to show its work in this regard, too: “When this Court issues its Opinion on his Motion, the public deserves to see what judicial document it relied on,” the judge argued in her opinion.

Sorry, Billo, those earlier settlements have to be part of the public record. O'Reilly is being sued, after all, thanks to his own tendency to shoot off his own fool mouth and deny that there was any substance to the cases he had settled, the details of which were of course hidden behind nondisclosure agreements. But when he appeared on the Today Show in September 2017, six months after Fox News canned him, he just couldn't resist calling his accusers Lying Liars who Lied:

O'Reilly explained to Matt Lauer (yes, we know) that he'd been framed, framed, and that he'd only been fired because mean liberals had organized an advertising boycott against him just because he was a conservative. As for all those settlements, O'Reilly said they were just Fox News making a business decision that settlements were cheaper than going to trial. Oh, but then he went that one step further, saying, "My conscience is clear," and insisting (after suggesting that at least one accuser had a history of lying), "If you look in totality, this was a hit job — a political and financial hit job."

That and other denials is what led to the defamation suit, which also claims O'Reilly had, by talking about the cases, violated his side of the confidentiality agreements. So thanks to Judge Batts's ruling, we now get to see the details of the settlements. One, with former Fox News producer Andrea Mackris -- who endured listening to O'Reilly's gross fantasy about showering with her and rubbing her all over with a "falafel" (loofah, whatever) -- has some jaw-droppingly insane provisions in it (you can read the whole document here).

Among other fun stuff, the settlement, negotiated by Makris's lawyer at the time, Benedict Morelli, included a section agreeing to turn over to O'Reilly's legal team all the evidence Mackris had of his harassment, including the "originals and any and all copies" of virtually every form of documentation Mackris might have had -- audio recordings, written materials (down to "transcripts, notes, diaries, calendars, memos, photographs, video recordings, digital recordings, letters and emails") as well as any digital versions of the same. Mackris also agreed to destroy any copies she might have, too. O'Reilly definitely wanted to make sure no more loofa transcripts would ever be leaked -- and to leave Mackris with no evidence of what he'd done. No wonder he was so confident no evidence would come to light.

Oh, but it gets weirder. We'll use Wemple's highlighted screenshot of the PDF file here:

Wemple notes he saved the image as "oreillyomg.png," because it's not every day that someone agrees that if a third party somehow releases any materials providing evidence of O'Reilly's misconduct, "all parties will disclaim them as counterfeit or forgeries." Mackris's attorneys in the defamation case against O'Reilly, Nancy Erika Smith and Neil Mullin, said in another filing Wednesday that this clause obligated Mackris to

"lie -- even in legal proceedings or under oath -- if any evidence becomes public, by calling evidence 'counterfeit' or 'forgeries.'"

That's a heck of a lawyering job by her earlier attorney, Benedict Morelli -- whose law firm, as it happens, went on to represent O'Reilly after drawing up the agreement between O'Reilly, Fox News, and Mackris, according to Smith and Mullin. CNN has the details on that subsequent agreement, in which Morelli promised his new bosses that his firm would never ever represent any sexual harassment plaintiffs against them. Maybe one should never trust a lawyer named "Benedict."

Morelli issued a statement in response, saying that he and his firm had "worked extremely hard to secure a significant financial settlement for" Mackris, and that

The claim that I did not vigorously represent her, or that I represented O'Reilly during or after the settlement process, is absolutely false.

If we're reading between the lines correctly here, he's denying that he represented O'Reilly personally. So hooray, he lawyered really good!

And through it all, O'Reilly's attorneys continue to insist there's simply nothing to any of the cases against him.

Fred Newman, an attorney representing O'Reilly, said in a statement on Wednesday that "the only reason Bill O'Reilly settled any cases was to protect his children."

"The settlement agreements were fully negotiated by these plaintiffs who were ably advised by experienced counsel. Confidentiality and arbitration were two critical terms for which Mr. O'Reilly bargained in good faith," the statement said. "For the past 14 years, Mr. O'Reilly has always respected the agreed confidentiality of the settlement agreements, but now that the provision has been breached, Mr. O'Reilly will be taking all appropriate legal action to enforce the agreements."

So even though we now see what a raw deal the women agreed to in those settlements, O'Reilly is determined to hold them to the agreements. He is, after all, an honorable man.

Yr Wonkette is supported by reader donations. Please click here to send us money! We'll even lie about your donation if you want us to.

[CNN / Daily Beast / WaPo]

Doktor Zoom

Doktor Zoom's real name is Marty Kelley, and he lives in the wilds of Boise, Idaho. He is not a medical doctor, but does have a real PhD in Rhetoric. You should definitely donate some money to this little mommyblog where he has finally found acceptance and cat pictures. He is on maternity leave until 2033. Here is his Twitter, also. His quest to avoid prolixity is not going so great.

$
Donate with CC

I'd mentioned this week that there's definitely probably a tape out there of Donald Trump referring to a black person as a "nigger," because Trump is a racist and that's sort of what they do. Sarah Huckabee Sanders won't even affirmatively deny such a tape exists, and she's from the "two plus two equals five" school of communications management. I also speculated that once the tape was released, Republican supporters of the president would flock to defend his vile words: "Hey, if you rearrange the letters in "nigger," you get "ginger" and who doesn't like redheads and the occasional Dark 'n' Stormy?"

The shameful display has already started and the supposed recording isn't even available for pre-order on iTunes. George State Senator Michael Williams stated in appearance on CNN's "New Day Saturday" that if Trump -- who's the president, by the way -- did say "nigger," it would certainly concern him as an "individual" but "not necessarily as a person that is running our country." So, uh, what the hell is that? This has been a standard argument from Republicans ever since Trump crawled his way out of the sewers of birtherism and onto a major political stage: "We think Trump is a terrible human being -- seriously, we have to shower immediately after meeting with him -- but we still think he's a suitable steward of the most powerful nation on the planet."

Normally, you'd think this would work the other way. You know, your brother-in-law is a nice enough guy. Your sister certainly could've done worse. You don't mind the slightly rambling sports-ball discussions with him at family gatherings. He's good for looking after the kids (as long as your sister is present or reachable by cell), but you'd never invest your hard-earned money into whatever half-assed business venture he's trying to get off the ground nor would you back his run for any serious political office.

I've long had issues with the "brilliant asshole" archetype in TV and movies. It's almost always a white male (because women and minorities must be perfect) whose emotional immaturity and overall jerkass behavior we're told to overlook because they're so goshdarned awesome. Do you want some PC "cuck" or do you want Dr. House to figure out that the MS symptoms you're suffering are really just because you ate a stale doughnut? Sherlock Holmes doesn't have time for your feelings or social niceties -- not while he's solving mysteries and being dreamy.

Trump, however, isn't "brilliant." He's just a guy who says "nigger." They're hardly a scarcity in the market. You don't even have to venture out to a klan rally to find one. You can order online -- same day social media delivery.

Williams argues that Trump didn't use the word "nigger" when he was in the "office of the president." It was just some youthful indiscretion when he was almost 60. I don't even know where he's going with this. Does he think Trump has changed? He routinely insults and belittles black people. He also calls black NFL players who peacefully protest "sons of bitches." Was that his way of weaning off calling us "niggers"? Has he been wearing a "nigger" patch on his arm to control his cravings for the racial epithet?

"He used the word in his personal life," Williams said. (It was actually in a workplace context -- SER) "Now if he were president and were to go on TV and use the n-word, I'd have a major problem with that."

media.giphy.com

It's heartening repulsive to see that Williams draws the line at Trump holding an official "nigger" press conference. I think once we reach that point, Trump will probably also reveal that his buddies on the Supreme Court discovered a typo in the Thirteenth Amendment and black folks' work-life balance will start to really suffer.

"I will always say using the n-word is wrong, and it's bad, and should never be accepted in our society. But just because (Trump) might have done it years ago, not as our president, doesn't mean we need to continue to berate him because he used it," GOP state Sen. Michael Williams, who is white, told CNN's Victor Blackwell on "New Day Saturday."

Blackwell, who is black, had to sit there and listen to this crap from a white elected official who is just 45 years old. You know, the word "nigger" doesn't even appear in the Dred Scott decision, for example, but that's not necessary for reasonable people to understand that it was racist as hell. We all know Trump is racist, but now Republicans can't even repudiate the worst demonstrations of his racial animus. The first black president hasn't even been out of office for two full years and already "nigger" is being redefined. What would once end a campaign in its tracks when Blackwell and I were growing up is now just an "oops, my bad."

Follow SER on Twitter

There's a new tip jar in town! Hit it below, to support the ad-free Wonkette experience, or click this link to make it monthly!

$
Donate with CC

Conservatives want to be oppressed. Or, rather, for everyone to think they are being oppressed and to then give them what they see as the impunity and moral upper hand that comes along with being an oppressed group of people. They want it very, very badly and think it is very unfair that all the people they have oppressed have this privilege and they do not. This morning, Trump took to Twitter to vow to protect them from the worst kind of oppression of all -- imaginary social media censorship!

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC
Donate

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

  • Saturday, Aug 11th ....... Seattle, WA
    Discovery Park, 4-7pm
  • Sunday, Aug 12th ....... Bellingham, WA
    Sunnyland Park, 2-5pm
  • Sunday, Aug 19th ....... Spokane, WA
    Audubon Park, 2-5pm

Read More

©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc