Donate

Megan McArdle Proposes The Worst Solution To Anything Ever

News

In the wake of Friday's horrific shooting, we've seen lots of suggestions on how to cope, how to move forward, and how to think about guns. We had predictably terrible people say predictably terrible things about how if there wereonly armed teachers, none of this would have happened. We had gun lobbyists showing up on your teevee to tell you that now is the time to be prepared to take up arms against your government.  Yr Wonkette got into the act with not-horrible-actually-quite-necessary think pieces on mental illness and how it is really fucking time to talk about guns and gun control. As thoughtful as we have been, and as awful as the usual suspects have been, it falls to Megan McArdle, now writing at the Daily Beast, to take things to an almost incomprehensible level of stupid. At the very end of approximately one million words where she says the only way to stop the kind of horror perpetrated at Newtown would be to ban all guns, but that we cannot ban all guns, she offers the only possible solution:


I'd also like us to encourage people to gang rush shooters, rather than following their instincts to hide; if we drilled it into young people that the correct thing to do is for everyone to instantly run at the guy with the gun, these sorts of mass shootings would be less deadly, because even a guy with a very powerful weapon can be brought down by 8-12 unarmed bodies piling on him at once.  Would it work?  Would people do it?  I have no idea; all I can say is that both these things would be more effective than banning rifles with pistol grips.

Yr Wonkette can state quite categorically that we have NEVER said something this stupid, and we posted that awful, stupid, terrible thing about Trig. In fact, we're not sure we've ever met anyone that has suggested something this stupid. In the wake of 20 dead kids...scratch that. In the wake of 20 TINY dead kids - aren't first graders like 4 feet tall, tops? - McMegan suggested that piling on a guy armed with a semi-automatic rifle and body armor would be a more effective anti-mass-murder strategy than banning certain types of weapons.  Let us restate that: MCMEGAN SUGGESTED LITTLE TINY CHILDREN PILE UPON A MASSIVELY ARMED ADULT SHOOTER AND THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE SUCCESSFUL BUT IT WOULD BE MORE EFFECTIVE THAN BANNING RIFLES WITH PISTOL GRIPS!

Don't get us wrong. We are fluent in wingnut, libertarian, and opportunistic centrist, so we know full well that McMegan left herself some wiggle room to assert she wasn't talking about this past shooting, which involved TINY LITTLE KIDS. No, we're sure she can tell us she meant some hypothetical future shooting of burly yet lithe football players, or warriors, or ninjas, or something. People much, much more qualified to tackle heavily armed and armored people bent on a killing spree.

Yr Wonkette would like to encourage Ms. McArdle to gang rush a six-lane freeway as soon as possible in order to stop the wretched traffic of the Beltway. Would it work? Would she do it? We have no idea; all we can say is that both these things would be more effective than banning Megan McArdle.

[Daily Beast]

$
Donate with CC

One of the most common things to say in America, just behind "Happy Birthday" and "NO COLLUSION," is "Mitch McConnell should go fuck himself." It works for all occasions, whether you have just stubbed your toe or whether you are in the middle of your wedding to your sweetheart. Try it!

But why should Mitch McConnell go fuck himself at this particular moment? Let's look at the top three current reasons!

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC

Sucks to be you, Pat Shanahan! The acting Defense secretary is currently under investigation for preferential treatment of his former bosses at Boeing, who just got busted letting planes fall out of the sky if buyers skimped on the upgrades. Shanahan was never a favorite of Trump's, and now his chances of getting made Big Boy For Real Sec Def are decreasing by the day. Which means that he's going through all this shit for nothing! Womp womp!

What shit, you ask? Well! Last night Shanahan announced the first tranche of the "found" money the DoD is shifting over to fund WALL in defiance of Congress's constitutional spending powers. The Defense Department will be transferring the cash from accounts meant to support military personnel into "anti-drug funding," which they've decided means they can use it to build "18-foot-high pedestrian fencing, constructing and improving roads, and installing lighting within the Yuma and El Paso Sectors of the border." Already pissed off about the fake EMERGY declaration, although not pissed enough to override a veto, congresspeople on both sides of the aisle are hopping mad that the Trump administration dicked them around for months, shut down the government, forced them to negotiate for wall funding in good faith, and then said HA HA SUCKERS, WE'RE JUST GOING TO STEAL IT FROM THE RAINY DAY FUND ANYWAY!

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC
Donate

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

Newsletter

©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc