Some Turkish Russian spy

Oh MAN, we continue to learn hilarious things about disgraced National Security Adviser/Foreign Agent Michael Flynn! Remember how Flynn was with Donald Trump basically the entire campaign, but Trump allegedly (haha yeah right yup) had no idea Flynn was a foreign agent who was currently making a nice chunk of change working on behalf of the Turkish government? Well, that story seems even odder to us now, considering what Democratic Rep. Elijah Cummings, ranking member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, has revealed in a letter sent to Trump, Defense Secretary James Mattis and FBI Director James Comey. It looks like before the campaign, Flynn was taking money from several instruments of the Russian government, and even better, it looks like he totally violated the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution in doing so! WEIRD, YEAH?

From Rep. Cummings's summary:

As part of his letter, Cummings released new documents obtained by the Oversight Committee—including payment vouchers, international financial transaction logs, and detailed email exchanges with Russian media officials—showing that the Kremlin-backed media outlet known as RT paid more than $45,000 for Flynn’s participation at a gala in Moscow in December 2015, during which he dined with Russian President Vladimir Putin, in apparent violation of the Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution. [...]

The documents reveal that Flynn also received $11,250 from a Russian charter cargo airline and $11,250 from a top Russia-based cybersecurity corporation.

WHOA IF TRUE! Cummings notes that the U.S. intelligence community has considered RT to be a tool of the Russian government since way back in 2012, when Flynn was the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, so he PROBABLY would have known that, when he got paid $45,000 to dine with Vladimir Putin and Jill Stein at the RT gala. You remember that picture, right? Let's look at it again!

We figured he ate some nice Russian food at that gala, but we never realized there was $45,000 underneath his napkin, or that it was left there by the state-run RT network!

The letter from Cummings goes through all the dirty details of how RT, and also the Russian airline and the cybersecurity company, are linked to the Russian government, and demands to know whether or not Flynn disclosed these details when applying for his security clearance. We're sure the cybersecurity outfit is no big deal, since it's not like Russia "cybered" America in any way over the past couple years, that we can think of.

Now, as to the part about Flynn violating the Emoluments Clause, the Cummings letter notes (without specifically saying so) that it doesn't matter that Obama had fired retired GENERAL Michael Flynn before he did these activities, because the clause specifically applies to retired military personnel, on account of how they can potentially be called back to service:

Significantly, retired regular military officers are also subject to the Emoluments Clause because they are subject to recall, and, therefore, hold an "Office of Profit or Trust" under the Emoluments Clause.

And as to the question of whether working for these companies funded or controlled in part by the Russians counts as "working for Russia," Cummings includes this handy quote from the Defense Department:

A foreign state includes any organization that is owned or operated by a foreign government, including federal, regional and local level governments ... Thus, foreign governmental entities, such as commercial entities owned or controlled by a foreign government and foreign public universities controlled by a foreign government, can be considered instrumentalities of "foreign states" for purposes of the Emoluments Clause.

Yep, sounds like Flynn is GUILTY!

So did he lie about all this stuff in his security clearance applications? Because that's a GO TO JAIL felony. Or did he tell the truth and Donald J. Trump just doesn't care, because Donald J. Trump doesn't love America? Who can say!

Oh, by the way, Cummings is also asking that the "Defense Department initiate steps to recover all foreign funds accepted by General Flynn in violation of the Emoluments Clause," so we guess Flynn better check his piggy bank and his couch cushions and stuff, because he needs to PAY UP!

We're glad we keep giving Elijah Cummings that Legislative Badass Of The Year award, because he sure does continue to earn it.

Here, have a Rachel Maddow segment about this:

So weird how everybody in Trump's inner circle keeps getting caught working for foreign governments, don't you think? TOTALLY NORMAL.

There is no clause against doing emoluments to Wonkette, which is entirely reader-funded. Do emoluments, with your dollars, by clicking the banners below!

[Cummings website / Cummings letter]

Evan Hurst

Evan Hurst is the senior editor of Wonkette, which means he is the boss of you, unless you are Rebecca, who is boss of him. His dog Lula is judging you right now.

Follow him on Twitter RIGHT HERE.

Donate with CC
Screenshot, CNN

If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell. And if that doesn't work, just make shit up.

Talking hairpiece Jay Sekulow went on Chris Cuomo's CNN show Wednesday night to barf out the latest Trumpland nonsense on the Russian WITCH HUNT. Remember way back in May, 2017 when Donald Trump told Lester Holt about that hilarious time he fired James Comey to murder the Russia investigation?

"I was going to fire Comey knowing there's no good time to do it. And in fact when I decided to just do it, I said to myself, I said, 'you know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made up story, it's an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they should have won.'"

Did you think that meant he actually fired Comey TO MURDER THE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION? Watch and learn, kids!

Keep reading... Show less
Donate with CC

In the words of the great Tammy Wynette, sometimes it's hard to be a woman. This week has been such a time for many of us out there, what with the impending prospect of seeing yet another sex predator who wants to take away our reproductive rights getting confirmed to the highest court in the land. Oh, it's almost like we, and our bodily autonomy, don't even matter at all.

Thankfully, several conservative columnists have graciously taken the time to explain to the rest of us why we should stand by their man. Not for his good, but for our own. Because it will be empowering. So come on gals, let's switch out our sneakers for pumps like the the working gals in 1980s movies, set up our desk salads, and just really lean in to see what they have to say!

First up, we've got Catherine Glenn Foster over at The Federalist, who wants us to know that losing our reproductive rights will empower us beyond our wildest dreams, according to the actual title of her essay.

Keep reading... Show less
Donate with CC

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)


©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc