Vladimir can have "I voted" sticker?
There is a new WHOA IF TRUE investigative report out this morning, a Newsweek cover story from reporter Kurt Eichenwald, about "Why Vladimir Putin's Russia Is Backing Trump." It builds on a lot that has been reported by others, about the extent of Russia's hacking campaign to influence the American election in favor of Donald Trump. You'll remember that Mother Jones 's David Corn published an explosive report this week that claims Russia has literally been cultivating Trump as an asset for YEARS. We don't know who Eichenwald's sources are, so we have to take all this with a grain of salt, but if his sources are indeed good and pure and true, then it adds to the very weird mosaic of the Kremlin's unprecedented interference in our election.
One surprising claim from Eichenwald's piece is that, though Russia has obviously been hacking and doing a propaganda operation in support of Trump (and against Hillary Clinton, whom Putin reportedly despises ), there have been times when the Kremlin got a wee bit worried about their boy Trump, like back in August, when he repeatedly attacked Khizr and Ghazala Khan, the Muslim couple whose son died in service to the American military:
Trump’s behavior ... has at times concerned the Russians, leading them to revise their hacking and disinformation strategy. For example, when Trump launched into an inexplicable attack on the parents of a Muslim-American soldier who died in combat, the Kremlin assumed the Republican nominee was showing himself psychologically unfit to be president and would be forced by his party to withdraw from the race. As a result, Moscow put its hacking campaign temporarily on hold, ending the distribution of documents until Trump stabilized, both personally and in the polls, according to reports provided to Western intelligence.
"Secret Trump asset go too far, appear to be unstable like Russian mole-rat!"
This obviously happened because, LOL, Russia does not understand idiot Trump supporters at all . Of course, Trump's polling numbers stabilized and Russia got back to hackin' and releasin' propaganda.
At this point, according to Eichenwald, the operation was creating divisions within the Kremlin, with some officials being like "Whoa hey nyet means nyet ! Russian campaign to destroy America not progressing as planned!" Prime Minister Dmitri Medvedev has reportedly been unhappy with it, and others in Russian government have lost their jobs.
By October, Mother Russia had become undecided voter like Ken Bone:
By October, “buyer’s remorse” had set in at the Kremlin, according to a report obtained by Western counterintelligence. Russia came to see Trump as too unpredictable and feared that, should he win, the Kremlin would not be able to rely on him or even anticipate his actions.
Eichenwald reports that Putin is OK with Hillary winning, as he believes she will be so "bogged down trying to heal divisions within the United States" caused by the Russian disinformation campaign, that she won't be able to get in his way all that much. (We'd note that Putin must be THRILLED that the FBI has become a rogue agency, as factions inside the bureau appear to be trying to do the same thing to Hillary as Putin has. Yay America!)
There's other fun stuff in Eichenwald's piece too! One thing that jumped out at us seems to confirm David Corn's report that Russian intelligence has been compiling dossiers on both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump for YEARS. Corn shared a memo that claimed Russia had "compromised" Trump during one of his visits to Moscow, and could therefore "blackmail" him. Eichenwald's piece bears that out, saying "the Kremlin ... has both video and audio recordings of Trump in a kompromat file," while noting that Newsweek isn't sure how compromising it is. Hey, remember after Corn's piece came out, all the intelligence community on Twitter started a-fluttering about a rumored TRUMP ORGY RUSSIA SEX TAPE? This could be that.
Eichenwald also claims the Russian hacking is even more extensive than many know:
Russian hackers penetrated the White House, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the State Department. The State Department cyberattack, which began in 2014 and lasted more than a year, was particularly severe, with Russian hackers gaining entry into its unclassified system, including emails. (Clinton left the State Department in 2013, which means that if she had used its unclassified email system rather than her private server—a decision that has dogged her throughout the campaign—any of her emails on the government system could have been obtained by Russian hackers).
HAHA, that parenthetical! Maybe Hillary used a private email server because SHE'S BRILLIANT AT FIGHTING RUSSIANS! (Nah, but it's an interesting thing!)
Anyway, whatever the extent of Russia's real influence over this election, whether it's a disinformation operation to delegitimize free and fair American elections, or whether Russia has actually been actively using Trump as its pawn -- like when Trump reads Russian propaganda onstage at campaign rallies, HAHA! -- Eichenwald says it's enough that all of our NATO allies are freaked the fucked out. They're especially bothered by how Trump absolutely refuses to acknowledge that Russia is behind all this, and says, "[o]fficials in Western Europe say they are dismayed that they now feel compelled to gather intelligence on a man" who could become our president. Yep, our allies are having to spy on Trump, you know, just in case.
Like we said, there is a lot of WHOA IF TRUE in Eichenwald's piece, but it's worth a read, so go do that while you wait in line to early vote for Hillary Clinton, please for the love of God, GO RIGHT NOW.
[ Newsweek ]
But "gif" would be correct according to any linguist. And we do like our cunning linguists as you know. It's short for graphic interface something something (<---extent of my tech knowledge) and we don't say jjjjjjraphic now do we?!!
Figure you're just being flip, but anyways, since Norm the Mailman isn't available:
... ya gotta understand Putin. Guy's not so much down with communism anymore. Hasn't been for some decades, by his own description...
Making life a repressive, paranoid horror, mind, totally! So I guess we can all get behind that, at least. But for other reasons entirely. It's... Umm... Very dour? But not very communist. Kinda an Orthodox version of a born again, social conservative type, really. You know when people get really grating saying America the Great? He's kinda that, only it's Russia the Great, Russia grand, you don't respect us enough and we're doing to damned well make you, that kinda thing...
As a local reference, I figure you can picture him kinda like a would-be manly man prosperity gospel Dominionist... sorta. Except backed by a now somewhat hobbled petro economy about the size of Mexico's, and a military that does have some jets and bombs about, and, to be fair, a certain savoir faire and what-the-hell-let's-try-this with the spycraft. Lots of imperial ambition, and, really, not a whole hell of a lot to lose. So, sure, it's let's let fly the hackers, see what they can do. He now seems to imagine western democracies weak and corrupt and slovenly and messy the way a certain colour of True Believer does the world over, figures he can exploit their openness, oddly, a bit like old Soviets woulda... That's one thing seems to have carried over more or less intact from his salad days in the KGB, I guess. But much of the rest of that old culture, I suspect he kinda despises (or might at most regard as quaint and doomed). Probably figures it just held Russia back (edit here to add, as it occurs to me: or at best was a stepping stone now long past its time, good with the rockets and the bombs and the repression, which I expect he kinda likes to be able to do, but kinda shitty at everything else), probably doesn't have a whole hell of a lot of respect for the poverty and all that came with it (he's rumoured to be pretty damned rich himself, tho' the actual official numbers aren't that wild). It's his thing is gonna be better, and all, let's have the imperial and military glory, without the bureaucratic mess that was communism... So it winds up a kinda socially conservative authoritarian vision...
And tho' I _suspect_ it's important to him, he's not real _overt_ about the religion; it's the social conservativism, the imperial stuff, the Russia pride stuff, that's the central axis of his public politics.
But, yeah, can't imagine him having much affection for a communist anything. And as for Trump, I don't figure Trump is really his style either, nor is he likely to have anything but the standard order contempt he has for the whole culture that spawned him--maybe a grudging respect for a man who knows how to keep a con going and rile a crowd--but more to the point: if he's a proper embarrassment to the US, weakens their international standing, breaks up coalitions they might lead or encourage to form, that's perfect, he's all for that.