Donate

Republicans right now, probably.


How weird, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) is having to take the Republican National Committee (RNC) to court to protect the integrity of the vote. SHOCKING, right? You see, the DNC has noticed all the rigamarole Donald J. Trump has been shouting at his supporters about #rigged elections, and about how they should all go to THOSE PLACES where THOSE PEOPLE vote, and just make sure they're not voting too black-ly. Surprisingly, the DNC thinks this amounts to voter intimidation and suppression, and moreover says the RNC, in supporting this, is in violation of a 1982 consent decree that said Republicans need to knock that shit off:

The RNC is supporting Trump’s recruitment of so-called watchers at polling places, which is in breach of consent decrees going back to 1982 that forbid the group from engaging in ballot-security measures, according to a filing in federal court in Newark, New Jersey. The DNC said the watchers are really intended to deter registered voters from casting ballots. [...]

“Trump has falsely and repeatedly told his supporters that the November 8 election will be ‘rigged’ based upon fabricated claims of voter fraud in ’certain areas,’ according to the filing. “Unsurprisingly, those ’certain areas’ are exclusively communities in which large minority voting populations reside.”

Lindsey Walters, a spokesperson for the RNC, says this lawsuit is a buncha nonsense, but it's always wise to remember that Republicans lie a lot. Interestingly, the consent decree is set to expire next year, so the Democrats are essentially arguing that since the GOP is supporting Trump's tactics, then that consent decree shouldn't be allowed to expire, because the GOP is bad, and it should feel bad.

What brought this consent decree about? During the 1981 New Jersey governor's race, the RNC allegedly targeted minority voters with mailers, and if those mailers came back to the post office, unable to be delivered, those voters' names ended up on a list of folks to "challenge" at the polls. Also, allegedly, they hired off-duty cops to hang out at polling places in minority areas and wear armbands suggesting they're part of the "National Ballot Security Task Force." They had visible guns, allegedly! Since these things are not actually "ballot security," but simply attempts to intimidate voters and encourage them not to vote, the RNC had to enter into this consent decree that says they won't do that crap anymore.

So! That is what is going on with that. We should note that this is different from the other story going around today about a "senior official" from the Trump campaign saying they have "three major voter suppression operations under way." That senior official says the campaign is targeting "idealistic white liberals, young women, and African Americans" with ads that feature Bill Clinton's accusers, or that say Hillary is a dirty flip-flopper on the Trans-Pacific Partnership, or that quote Hillary back in the '90s using the term "super predator" to refer to some kids in gangs.

Shitty as these tactics are, they're totally legal. They're not "voter suppression." They're just political ads!

The Trump campaign's calculation here is that this will make all those people stay home, instead of voting for Devil Hillary. Obviously they're doing this because it's literally impossible for Trump to attract any new supporters, because all sane Americans agree that he's terrible and disgusting and gropey and acts a little bit like a common Hitler. So they have to try to "suppress" (they mean "depress," because, again, negative campaign ads are not "voter suppression") Hillary's vote. Again, negative ads are very much allowed, and there is nothing suppressive about them! "Voter suppression" is shit like the intimidation at the polls Trump is constantly calling for, or the disenfranchisement of black voters in pretty much every state that's got a Republican lege or secretary of state.

The good news, as Greg Sargent points out at the Washington Post is that the strategy probably isn't going to work, based on reports that show Hillary already beating Trump's ass in the early voting department.

So, class, what have we learned today? We've learned there are two big stories going around about Trump and the RNC engaging in "voter suppression," and that they are not the same story! Sending armed freaks to the polls to monitor for Voting While Black is bad, and the RNC is getting sued for directly and indirectly promoting Trump's incredibly subtle calls for that. The other thing about the political ads is ... not a thing.

This has been the latest episode of Wonkette 'Splains WTF The News Is Yammering About Today.

[Bloomberg / Bloomberg again]

Evan Hurst

Evan Hurst is the senior editor of Wonkette, which means he is the boss of you, unless you are Rebecca, who is boss of him. His dog Lula is judging you right now.

Follow him on Twitter RIGHT HERE.

$
Donate with CC
Photo by Wonkette operative 'Zippy W. Spincycle'

Last week, Yr Dok Zoom talked a little bit about his damn dissertation, which looked at "Wabbit Literacy," the weird thing where we sometimes learn about the world from parodies and jokes long before we ever encounter the original stuff -- like learning about opera from cartoons. More than one person in the comments (which Wonkette does not allow and yet, like life, you find a way) mentioned they were disappointed, as kids, to learn that while roadrunners are real birds, the actual critter looks nothing like this:

Which is not to say that real roadrunners are the least bit disappointing, as animals go, because they're freaking incredible. Yes, even if they don't actually leave lines of flame down the center line of desert highways and go "Meep! Meep!" But they can sprint up to 20 miles per hour, which is faster than you, albeit slower than a real coyote's top speed. Also, yes, real coyotes are among the predators what eat roadrunners, which is why the wily birds adopted the evolutionary strategy of running right through fake tunnels coyotes paint on the sides of mountains.

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC

Once upon a time... about ten years ago, a group of entirely ridiculous men burst onto the scene wearing stupid hats and telling men that wearing stupid hats and telling men that walking up to women in bars and insulting ("negging") them would get them laid. This did not last long, as women also had televisions and computers and were completely aware of these tricks as well, so when some ass came up to us in a bar and said "Hey, nice nails, are they real?" we would laugh and laugh and loudly announce "Oh my god, this guy just tried to neg me! Can you believe that shit? HEY EVERYONE, THIS GUY JUST TRIED TO NEG ME!" and then refer to him as "Mystery" the whole night.

Most of the men who tried that shit only did so a few times before realizing that it wasn't going to work, and thus moved on to other things. Perhaps things that did not involve furry hats and coming off as a huge creep. We may never know, because I would assume that those who tried it are now extremely embarrassed and would never, ever admit to this to us.

Still, there were a few men willing to eat that shit up, as well as some grifters willing to take advantage of that. Said grifters tended to be extremely misogynistic and seemed more like they were teaching men how to be as despised by women as they were than teaching them how to actually be liked by women.

Some of them, like Roosh V, a creepy weirdo who actually does live in his mom's basement, actively encouraged men to rape women who were intoxicated to the point of being obviously unable to consent.

However, even that branch of the PUA tree is wilting away. Many "self-help" style PUA forums like Nextasf and RSDnation are shutting down or have already shut down. In March, Chateau Heartiste, a batshit crazy PUA turned White Nationalist/Alt-Right blog was shut down by Wordpress. This week, rape advocate Roosh V (whom you may recall once called yours truly a "Wonkette typist/clown face, would not bang") announced that he was renouncing his PUA ways and devoting himself to Jesus. He explained to the forum he manages that he would no longer be allowing anyone to discuss premarital "fornication."

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC
Donate

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

Newsletter

©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc