Discussion about this post

User's avatar
bupkus231's avatar

I guess I don't see the "norms" changing decades ago. And I do remember Anita Hill - maybe if "norms" had changed, her testimony may have made a difference. And there were many more men "at fault" there than just Joe.

I don't think you can retrofit changing "norms" to that period.

As you say, Joe acknowledged that his attitudes toward Anita Hill in those confirmation hearings - he did do long before this current controversy, no matter what you think.

Link: https://www.teenvogue.com/s...

In 1991, law professor Anita Hill sat before the Senate Judiciary Committee, led by Senator Joe Biden, and detailed the alleged harassment she experienced from her boss, Clarence Thomas, who was just about to be confirmed as a Supreme Court Justice. Throughout Hill's testimony, she weathered attacks on her character and her trustworthiness from those on the Senate panel, and many have blamed Biden for allowing those attacks and failing to do more. Nearly three decades after her testimony, and after Thomas was seated on the court, Biden wants Anita Hill to know that he's sorry.In an interview with Teen Vogue's editor in chief, Elaine Welteroth, Biden said there are a few things he would do differently if he could go back and redo those Anita Hill hearings."I believed Anita Hill. I voted against Clarence Thomas. And I insisted the next election — I campaigned for two women Senators on the condition that if they won they would come on the Judiciary Committee, so there would never be again all men making a judgment on this," Biden said. "And my one regret is that I wasn’t able to tone down the attacks on her by some of my Republican friends. I mean, they really went after her. As much as I tried to intervene, I did not have the power to gavel them out of order. I tried to be like a judge and only allow a question that would be relevant to ask."

I think Joe's role in those hearings, and in the maltreatment of Anita Hill, are being overinflated and made more personally mean - for political benefit by some, and ignorance and faulty memories/research by others

Expand full comment
From Scranton With Love's avatar

Both. And "nuclear weapons are much more useful as a deterrent and will never be actually used" bolsters my disagreement with them being Russian satellite states.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...

Expand full comment
307 more comments...

No posts