In 2020 a crack(ed in the fucking head) legal team of insane, drunk and stupid lawyers was sent on a mission by a jackass loser Narcissist Crybaby to defeat an election that the crybaby didn't win. These feebs promptly contested the results on totally sketchy legal grounds and lost. Today, still trying to get the narcissist pay their fees and to pay their mounting legal fees/debarring, they survive as pundits on barely seen RW news networks, lawyers of misfortune or Q-Anon phone sex operators. If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, you still shouldn't hire anyone from the Kraken-Team.
Don’t give up hope, they could all still end up in prison or at a facility for the ridiculously insane. At the very least we might see them broke, broken, and defeated.
"their lawsuit was garbage because "no reasonable person..."
The 'reasonable person' standard is of no use as reasonable is an extremely subjective term and there is no agreement on what the definition should be. The courts depend on this standard far too much as great cost to justice. In this instance the judge can be seen as correct, but rarely are the details so clear and the actions so bizarre.
From 5th grade thru high school, I was immersed in Latin along with French.[Didn't KNOW I'd become an English major!]Since Latin is the root of nearly EVERYTHING, I am pleasantly surprised that I can still automatically translate most stuff I see!Celtic is automatic for me--my grands spoke it a bit when I was a kid (all of them came here).
I take issue with when Tucker Carlson used it. The judge agreed with him, basically giving him carte blanche to say whatever he wants, since he allegedly isn't credible.
However, millions of people, including my Trumpy Neighbor, watch him and believe every word that comes out of his mouth.
So what does "reasonable" mean? If you've got millions of low-information voters who believe this nonsense, how do you factor that in?
https://uploads.disquscdn.c...
And ok.... you did not and I didn't check the way those were labelled. Sorry about Finland.
In 2020 a crack(ed in the fucking head) legal team of insane, drunk and stupid lawyers was sent on a mission by a jackass loser Narcissist Crybaby to defeat an election that the crybaby didn't win. These feebs promptly contested the results on totally sketchy legal grounds and lost. Today, still trying to get the narcissist pay their fees and to pay their mounting legal fees/debarring, they survive as pundits on barely seen RW news networks, lawyers of misfortune or Q-Anon phone sex operators. If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, you still shouldn't hire anyone from the Kraken-Team.
so sad, I had so many hopes for these grifters
Don’t give up hope, they could all still end up in prison or at a facility for the ridiculously insane. At the very least we might see them broke, broken, and defeated.
"their lawsuit was garbage because "no reasonable person..."
The 'reasonable person' standard is of no use as reasonable is an extremely subjective term and there is no agreement on what the definition should be. The courts depend on this standard far too much as great cost to justice. In this instance the judge can be seen as correct, but rarely are the details so clear and the actions so bizarre.
From 5th grade thru high school, I was immersed in Latin along with French.[Didn't KNOW I'd become an English major!]Since Latin is the root of nearly EVERYTHING, I am pleasantly surprised that I can still automatically translate most stuff I see!Celtic is automatic for me--my grands spoke it a bit when I was a kid (all of them came here).
EXCELLENT movie!
Ah, good times....
One thing's for sure, there'll be more of this on 2022. Once you're on the crazy Train, you kinda hafta ride it to the end of track.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/8HHo...
VOMITUS!!!!!!!!
It'd be pretty fun if those lawsuits actually moved forward and these people (including Fox News) were too broke to be seen in public ever again...
So like. Get on that.
I take issue with when Tucker Carlson used it. The judge agreed with him, basically giving him carte blanche to say whatever he wants, since he allegedly isn't credible.
However, millions of people, including my Trumpy Neighbor, watch him and believe every word that comes out of his mouth.
So what does "reasonable" mean? If you've got millions of low-information voters who believe this nonsense, how do you factor that in?
Couldn't be worse than Sharknado.
Heron?