So it is Wednesday, the third day since Alabama was victimized by a gratuitous federal over-reach-around that required the state to allow gay marriage, even in the really wingnut parts.
It will most certainly remain in motion long after the Supremes finally put a (legal) end to the (stupid) question of whether gay people are equal citizens under the law.
Even Texans had the common sense to elect <a href="http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Louie_Gohmert#Early_political_career" target="_blank">its dumbest judge</a> to a position that would keep him off the bench, and out of the state, indefinitely.
<i>&quot;Should state courts have obeyed the 1857 ruling of the Supreme Court in Dred Scott that black people were property?&quot; </i>
If memory serves, Alabama obeyed that law quite happily.
<i>&quot;Should state courts have obeyed the 1857 ruling of the Supreme Court in Dred Scott that black people were property?&quot;</i>
Children are property, my friends. That&#039;s why they&#039;re easy to buy on ebay. <blockquote> Cute 3 year old boy. Likes Snoopy and Hello Kitty. Must sell, make offer. </blockquote>
It&#039;s been three days now, and I&#039;m still not feeling my traditional marriage being threatened. What&#039;s the incubation period for this plague?
Dred Scott. Really? They just <i>want</i> to look as comical as possible? That &quot;late unpleasantness&quot; is all forgotten now -- as in amnesia? As a backup, I&#039;ve heard that holding your breath until you turn blue always works.
Or take off and nuke it from space? It&#039;s the only way to be sure.
It will most certainly remain in motion long after the Supremes finally put a (legal) end to the (stupid) question of whether gay people are equal citizens under the law.
Even Texans had the common sense to elect <a href="http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Louie_Gohmert#Early_political_career" target="_blank">its dumbest judge</a> to a position that would keep him off the bench, and out of the state, indefinitely.
Good godamitey, a Fakakta sighting.
<i>&quot;Should state courts have obeyed the 1857 ruling of the Supreme Court in Dred Scott that black people were property?&quot; </i>
If memory serves, Alabama obeyed that law quite happily.
<i>&quot;Should state courts have obeyed the 1857 ruling of the Supreme Court in Dred Scott that black people were property?&quot;</i>
Children are property, my friends. That&#039;s why they&#039;re easy to buy on ebay. <blockquote> Cute 3 year old boy. Likes Snoopy and Hello Kitty. Must sell, make offer. </blockquote>
The graphics people at Bloomberg missed an opportunity to call it &quot;Roll Pride&quot;.
Unlike things performed between two consenting adults, we&#039;re not asking nor are we expecting you to <i> like </i> this, Alabama.
June is bustin&#039; out all over.
The are a lot of Republican voters who will continue to oppose same-sex marriage until they&#039;re in one. And maybe not stop even then.
It&#039;s been three days now, and I&#039;m still not feeling my traditional marriage being threatened. What&#039;s the incubation period for this plague?
Dred Scott. Really? They just <i>want</i> to look as comical as possible? That &quot;late unpleasantness&quot; is all forgotten now -- as in amnesia? As a backup, I&#039;ve heard that holding your breath until you turn blue always works.
That&#039;s not even speculation; it&#039;s a straight first order deduction of the general rule to a specific case.