And when you&#039;re whining for publicity, don&#039;t negate your Offensensitivity by admitting that you agreed to participate <i>even though</i> you didn&#039;t know &quot;how the interview footage would be used.&quot;
<blockquote>&ldquo;They said they couldn&rsquo;t say who else they were interviewing. It seems like they were under a gag order. They couldn&rsquo;t tell me who it was for. I asked to see the video of me, but they weren&rsquo;t willing to show me that,&rdquo; Earley said.</blockquote>
He is dumb. It probably seemed like the interviewers were fighting their gag <i>reflex</i> while in his presence, but that&#039;s hardly the same thing as a &quot;gag order.&quot;
About as much as &quot;the round square cupola on Berkeley College&quot;. Whether that meant anything kept Willard Van Orman Quine gainfully employed for quite a while. (Confession: I just wanted to type &quot;Willard Van Orman Quine&quot;. It has the same effect on me as &quot;Patience Roggensack&quot; does on Charlie Pierce.)
She has dropped the fatwa. Maybe now that they are in the minority, who knows?
Not a good thing with ones first coffee of the morning. Aaargh.
only if we&#039;re talking about M&ouml;bius, the famous electronic dance music DJ
It&#039;s a version of Pascal&#039;s Wager. I sometimes wish spiritualism were true, so we could ask old Blaise how that worked out.
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watc..." target="_blank">" rel="nofollow noopener" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdnXYWSa56w">http://www.youtube.com/watc...
(language NSFW)
It&#039;s not just plausible - their absence in Iraq plainly proves it&#039;s true!!!!!1!!
And when you&#039;re whining for publicity, don&#039;t negate your Offensensitivity by admitting that you agreed to participate <i>even though</i> you didn&#039;t know &quot;how the interview footage would be used.&quot;
<blockquote>&ldquo;They said they couldn&rsquo;t say who else they were interviewing. It seems like they were under a gag order. They couldn&rsquo;t tell me who it was for. I asked to see the video of me, but they weren&rsquo;t willing to show me that,&rdquo; Earley said.</blockquote>
He is dumb. It probably seemed like the interviewers were fighting their gag <i>reflex</i> while in his presence, but that&#039;s hardly the same thing as a &quot;gag order.&quot;
It never gets old.
Maybe I exaggerate. Not *all* math nerds -- OK, a rather small subset of math nerds. But normal people can enjoy the grace and beauty of it.
&quot;consistency isn&#039;t one of their strong suits...&quot;
They&#039;re void in that suit.
&quot;Anyone who quotes what I said, is lying.&quot;
<i>Science and technology that proves the humanness of the womb</i>?
What does that even mean?
Oops. I wondered about the capital &#039;L&#039;, but didn&#039;t catch on. Belated upfists for a Killing joke.
Asking someone what he thinks? OMG!!! What other horrible thing will Obama do next?
About as much as &quot;the round square cupola on Berkeley College&quot;. Whether that meant anything kept Willard Van Orman Quine gainfully employed for quite a while. (Confession: I just wanted to type &quot;Willard Van Orman Quine&quot;. It has the same effect on me as &quot;Patience Roggensack&quot; does on Charlie Pierce.)