12 Comments
User's avatar
The Quirk's avatar

IMplicit sex is always dangerouser than EXplicit sex.

𝔅𝔢𝔢𝔩𝔷𝔢𝔟𝔲𝔟𝔟𝔞's avatar

We're on a slippery slope here, people. Next thing you know, you won't be able to force a man to testify against a dog in federal court.

Bourgeois Nerd's avatar

Nothing says "degenerate sodomites trespassing against all the laws of God and man" like "joint bankruptcy filing." 'Tis the end of Western civilization!

Lot_49's avatar

Indded. Like the difference between \"presumption of innocence\" and \"happened to be in an area where all young men are automatically considered jehadis.\"

ViveLaProtestPayments's avatar

That's so cool! Congratulations and much happiness to both of you.

bobbert's avatar

Congratulations and very best wishes.

I was at the Mall of America once (like, twenty-ish years ago). Only mall I've ever seen that has multiple copies of the same store in different parts of the mall. Well, unless you count Singapore as just being one big mall.

Shypixel's avatar

Geez. What is it with the gehys and their wanting everything to be the same?

Same sex, same humanity, same rights, same feelings, same joys, same fears, same dreams... etc.

It's like they feel they are the same as the rest of us...

Oh. NOW I get it.

Lot_49's avatar

The Eric Holder who says, "Listen, we drone-bomb people after some sort of due process that's too triple-ultra-secret to explain to you proles, just trust us" isn't too lovable either. But gay-rights and voting-rights Holder are indeed adorable.

Lot_49's avatar

Rustling leaves mean no!

PsycWench's avatar

<i>“The American public needs to realize how egregious and how dangerous these usurpations are and how far-reaching the implications can be</i>

I've heard this vague threatening language for years but I still haven't seen any believable concrete examples of what these implications might be.