Yes, "we" know, except those of us who've read the studies that say quite clearly that same-sex couples do at least as good a job (one study said a slightly better job) or parenting as mother/father homes.
Because we all know that "actual" leaders help shape the thoughts only of their enlightened children, not the ignorant populace at large.
<blockquote>that&rsquo;s not a reason to change thousands of years of thinking about marriage.</blockquote>
No, but wanting to shack up with your latest is beau <em>is</em> a reason to change thousands of years of thinking about marriage, such as by inventing the notion that you can have a 30-day risk-free* trial.
* Trial is not risk free. Number of babies conceived may go up as well as up. Invest at your own risk.
I assume the reference is to the alleged Palin &quot;family council&quot; that told Sarah-poo to go &#039;head and run for VP.
The latest from Megs: <i>Meghan McCain &rlm; @McCainBlogette @chelywright so nice meeting you as well. Thank you for your courage!! Xoxo Meghan McCain &rlm; @McCainBlogette My take on President Obama&#039;s support of same-sex marriage: <a href="" rel="nofollow noopener" title="http://mccainblogette.com/blog/post/obama-for-gay-marriage">http://mccainblogette.com/b..." target="_blank">" rel="nofollow noopener" title="http://mccainblogette.com/blog/post/obama-for-gay-marriage">http://mccainblogette.com/b...
Yes, &quot;we&quot; know, except those of us who&#039;ve read the studies that say quite clearly that same-sex couples do at least as good a job (one study said a slightly better job) or parenting as mother/father homes.
<i>&quot;Sometimes dads should lead their family in the right ways of thinking.&quot;</i>
Yeah ... how&#039;s that workin&#039; out for ya?
Sounds like a good explanation for the &quot;better&quot; result.
Sounds like a great fundraising opportunity.
Perhaps John Edwards will console her.
Because we all know that &quot;actual&quot; leaders help shape the thoughts only of their enlightened children, not the ignorant populace at large.
<blockquote>that&rsquo;s not a reason to change thousands of years of thinking about marriage.</blockquote>
No, but wanting to shack up with your latest is beau <em>is</em> a reason to change thousands of years of thinking about marriage, such as by inventing the notion that you can have a 30-day risk-free* trial.
* Trial is not risk free. Number of babies conceived may go up as well as up. Invest at your own risk.
This troll has all of the charm of a used q-tip.
Bristol is right about one thing - Sarah Palin&#039;s problems have absolutely nothing to do with her listening too much to Todd.