Oh good, Alaska's at-risk youth have an opinion about Barack Obama's new/old stance in favor of same-sex marriage! He revealed this to America with a bland anecdote about how his daughters would never think to treat the gay parents of their classmates differently than other parents, remember? Let's go to spokesmom Bristol Palin for the official Wasilla Family Values Coalition
Yes, "we" know, except those of us who've read the studies that say quite clearly that same-sex couples do at least as good a job (one study said a slightly better job) or parenting as mother/father homes.
Because we all know that "actual" leaders help shape the thoughts only of their enlightened children, not the ignorant populace at large.
<blockquote>that&rsquo;s not a reason to change thousands of years of thinking about marriage.</blockquote>
No, but wanting to shack up with your latest is beau <em>is</em> a reason to change thousands of years of thinking about marriage, such as by inventing the notion that you can have a 30-day risk-free* trial.
* Trial is not risk free. Number of babies conceived may go up as well as up. Invest at your own risk.
I assume the reference is to the alleged Palin &quot;family council&quot; that told Sarah-poo to go &#039;head and run for VP.
The latest from Megs: <i>Meghan McCain &rlm; @McCainBlogette @chelywright so nice meeting you as well. Thank you for your courage!! Xoxo Meghan McCain &rlm; @McCainBlogette My take on President Obama&#039;s support of same-sex marriage: <a href="" rel="nofollow noopener" title="http://mccainblogette.com/blog/post/obama-for-gay-marriage">http://mccainblogette.com/b..." target="_blank">" rel="nofollow noopener" title="http://mccainblogette.com/blog/post/obama-for-gay-marriage">http://mccainblogette.com/b...
Yes, &quot;we&quot; know, except those of us who&#039;ve read the studies that say quite clearly that same-sex couples do at least as good a job (one study said a slightly better job) or parenting as mother/father homes.
<i>&quot;Sometimes dads should lead their family in the right ways of thinking.&quot;</i>
Yeah ... how&#039;s that workin&#039; out for ya?
Sounds like a good explanation for the &quot;better&quot; result.
Sounds like a great fundraising opportunity.
Perhaps John Edwards will console her.
Because we all know that &quot;actual&quot; leaders help shape the thoughts only of their enlightened children, not the ignorant populace at large.
<blockquote>that&rsquo;s not a reason to change thousands of years of thinking about marriage.</blockquote>
No, but wanting to shack up with your latest is beau <em>is</em> a reason to change thousands of years of thinking about marriage, such as by inventing the notion that you can have a 30-day risk-free* trial.
* Trial is not risk free. Number of babies conceived may go up as well as up. Invest at your own risk.
This troll has all of the charm of a used q-tip.
Bristol is right about one thing - Sarah Palin&#039;s problems have absolutely nothing to do with her listening too much to Todd.