143 Comments
User's avatar
ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®©'s avatar

Making Saddam's mustache fall out would have been traditional. (Try it enough, maybe it would work?)~

Expand full comment
Staid Winnow 🔎👽🔍's avatar

Simple rule. 'i' before 'e', except after 'c' as in 'receive'

No wait, except for 'science'.

That's i... no wait, also 'society'

Dammit, it is confusing.

Expand full comment
Zippy W. Pinhead's avatar

I'd love to hear Dr. Dumbass explain how taking out Saddam without invading Iraq would be any less likely to create the same power vacuum we see now- either way, all the usual suspects would seize the opportunity they're seizing now

Expand full comment
Bill Slider's avatar

It's Googles fault. They tailor ads to your interests as the perceive them to be.

Expand full comment
Zippy W. Pinhead's avatar

Neither of those deign to follow the rule either, so I wouldn't give it too much weight

weird, eh?

Expand full comment
arglebargle's avatar

But, but, but... we'll be greeted as liberators. Thus victory is assured and no exit strategery needed. Plus, all the oils will pay for the whole shebang. Or should I say sheBANG! But I'm mixing my cheneys, rumsfelds and carsons. Very unseemly.

Expand full comment
JohnR's avatar

Oh sure, history, we are not historians and and therefore can not learn anything from it, mistakes are made to be repeated until everyone is dead, last man wins.

Expand full comment
Gherkins d'Resistance's avatar

"Yes! I said, we'll be petroleum independent in 10 years! Which totally is possible, you guys.""I said it is totally possible, maybe you didn't hear because of all that laughing you haven't stopped doing. Which is actually rude, in my country."

Expand full comment
JDM's avatar

Becoming petroleum independent was once high on the agenda, circa Jimmy Carter. We know how the Republicans embraced that one. And since becoming independent requires using alternatives, we know how high on the agenda that was for Bush and Cheney, not to mention the rest of the GOP.

Expand full comment
Bitter Scribe's avatar

Only if you get Tina Turner to run the place.

Expand full comment
Paperless Tiger's avatar

Regime change, how does it work?

Expand full comment
dshwa's avatar

Oh Ben, we could drill every square inch of where oil is available in the U.S., and it STILL wouldn't keep up with out current rate of increasing demand. Got any real solutions rattling around up there?

Expand full comment
dshwa's avatar

I think they were less worried about being bombed back into the stone age and more about maintaining their grip on power, but they were willing to negotiate. Unfortunately, the people on the other end had grand delusions of creating their own reality of an empire.

Expand full comment
Bozi Will Remember 1-6-2021's avatar

Let them fight it out "Texas Biker Gang" style.

Expand full comment
Zippy W. Pinhead's avatar

basically both. handing over Osama probably would've ended their regime- their only hope was some face saving excuse or enough sleight of hand to avoid the wrath of the faithful. Plus, having their cities get destroyed is bad for morale

Expand full comment
sgt. jmk de la résistance's avatar

Carson (in common with many of the other clown car occupants) has clearly chosen theocratic oligarchy.

Expand full comment