I am NOT laughing at his pain. I'm sipping on it: aerating and tasting his notes of shame, self-hate, panic, and knee-jerk blaming. I'm not even spitting it out; I'm getting drunk on his descent into utter irrelevance and embarrassment....maybe laughing a little.
I stopped reading when you got your first facts wrong.
Ben or the DW is not responsible for Fuentes, Candace, Tucker. Fuentes never worked for DW, Tucker never worked for DW and even if they did, DW is not responsible for their hosts going crazy. When your hosts go crazy and start public Twitter wars with a co-host and co-owner of the company, and then use Christian Praise as part of an anti-Semite attack, you fire them.
There was no public split with TPUSA and Candace. She last appeared at a TPUSA event while 9 months pregnant. She went on maternity leave November of 23 and had 4 months of maternity leave, she was fired March 20.
> This entire crop of current conservatives was born out of annoyance with the sorts of “woke liberals” that they are no longer regularly exposed to,
Even if you take the liberal strawman position that righties have no genuine grievances (e.g. Rotherham and the similar atrocities that pop up on a biweekly basis), and that they're just mad about culture war nonsense, this is still gibberish.
Nolan's Odyssey, infamously, has gone further off the deep end than any prior major motion picture, casting an African as Helen of Troy and recasting the ancient Greek armies as if they were subdivisions of the Burger King Kids' Club. Even the most facile, easy-to-discard aspects of "woke" are as omnipresent and as heavily-imposed as they ever were, despite their unpopularity.
"Matt Walsh doesn’t think women should be allowed to vote, but should instead have their vote cast for them, as a family unit, by their husbands." This isnt what he said voting as a family unit doesent necesarilly mean thst the woman will have her vote cast for her, or that her opinion is not important.
I write this to defend Ben (I'm just a 5 year DW member)
You do not have to 100% agree with someone to find their content informative.
Hired Candace because she was a unique voice and had a different opinion than they did. DW officially stated they desire heterodox voices and free speech. Has it changed? Maybe. Your piece ignores this.
Ben (not Knowles or Walsh, I don't agree with them but they still sometimes have surprising information) has repeatedly spoken many many times that he respects women and their intellect and skills. What you are doing is a whataboutism and redirecting to the other members.
His campus debates were set up on campus in auditoriums, courtyards with a microphone for people to come up and debate him. Nobody was "forcing them". They wanted to!
DW stories are now about 60% right wing Trumpian wish fulfillment. I do not like Trump but I'm not voting for a moron like Harris) Ben doesn't write these "articles". Does he approve them? You probably don't know. I don't either.
Ben isn't a perfect human specimen. His podcasts often have very interesting perceptions and synthesis I don't see from others. I do not have to 100% agree with someone to find their content informative.
Do you even know what fascism means? Fascism is an economy and culture of subsuming the individual to the state. Requires companies to do it's bidding. It is a Progressive movement. It is a movement that wishes to "improve" the world just like Communism. (I'm not a fan) Ben is a free market, classically liberal Constitutionalist. Basically the absolute opposite of what you wrote.
You just couldn't resist adding in an ad hominem at the end and try to make him look sexually unattractive. Why is his sexuality important to you?
Fuck that little Fucking Jew
I am NOT laughing at his pain. I'm sipping on it: aerating and tasting his notes of shame, self-hate, panic, and knee-jerk blaming. I'm not even spitting it out; I'm getting drunk on his descent into utter irrelevance and embarrassment....maybe laughing a little.
Exactly
Too bad that Ben Kirk’d his own show into oblivion, I hope he cries himself to death 🤪
Only Ben Shapiro would accuse someone of being “a Muslim apologist.”
I stopped reading when you got your first facts wrong.
Ben or the DW is not responsible for Fuentes, Candace, Tucker. Fuentes never worked for DW, Tucker never worked for DW and even if they did, DW is not responsible for their hosts going crazy. When your hosts go crazy and start public Twitter wars with a co-host and co-owner of the company, and then use Christian Praise as part of an anti-Semite attack, you fire them.
There was no public split with TPUSA and Candace. She last appeared at a TPUSA event while 9 months pregnant. She went on maternity leave November of 23 and had 4 months of maternity leave, she was fired March 20.
Temu charlie kirk
Utter complete garbage.
He was a jerk to Candace Owens so it's his come up ins. But nobody should be laughing at his pain we're not supposed to rejoice says God's word.
One less rat to haul to the town dump.
> This entire crop of current conservatives was born out of annoyance with the sorts of “woke liberals” that they are no longer regularly exposed to,
Even if you take the liberal strawman position that righties have no genuine grievances (e.g. Rotherham and the similar atrocities that pop up on a biweekly basis), and that they're just mad about culture war nonsense, this is still gibberish.
Nolan's Odyssey, infamously, has gone further off the deep end than any prior major motion picture, casting an African as Helen of Troy and recasting the ancient Greek armies as if they were subdivisions of the Burger King Kids' Club. Even the most facile, easy-to-discard aspects of "woke" are as omnipresent and as heavily-imposed as they ever were, despite their unpopularity.
"Matt Walsh doesn’t think women should be allowed to vote, but should instead have their vote cast for them, as a family unit, by their husbands." This isnt what he said voting as a family unit doesent necesarilly mean thst the woman will have her vote cast for her, or that her opinion is not important.
Hahahahha fixk the little ball sack
It is a good day when Zionists suffer,
I write this to defend Ben (I'm just a 5 year DW member)
You do not have to 100% agree with someone to find their content informative.
Hired Candace because she was a unique voice and had a different opinion than they did. DW officially stated they desire heterodox voices and free speech. Has it changed? Maybe. Your piece ignores this.
Ben (not Knowles or Walsh, I don't agree with them but they still sometimes have surprising information) has repeatedly spoken many many times that he respects women and their intellect and skills. What you are doing is a whataboutism and redirecting to the other members.
His campus debates were set up on campus in auditoriums, courtyards with a microphone for people to come up and debate him. Nobody was "forcing them". They wanted to!
DW stories are now about 60% right wing Trumpian wish fulfillment. I do not like Trump but I'm not voting for a moron like Harris) Ben doesn't write these "articles". Does he approve them? You probably don't know. I don't either.
Ben isn't a perfect human specimen. His podcasts often have very interesting perceptions and synthesis I don't see from others. I do not have to 100% agree with someone to find their content informative.
Do you even know what fascism means? Fascism is an economy and culture of subsuming the individual to the state. Requires companies to do it's bidding. It is a Progressive movement. It is a movement that wishes to "improve" the world just like Communism. (I'm not a fan) Ben is a free market, classically liberal Constitutionalist. Basically the absolute opposite of what you wrote.
You just couldn't resist adding in an ad hominem at the end and try to make him look sexually unattractive. Why is his sexuality important to you?
All sour grapes and cheap shots.
Who?