22 Comments
User's avatar
𝔅𝔢𝔢𝔩𝔷𝔢𝔟𝔲𝔟𝔟𝔞's avatar

Warren/Sanders 2016.

I'm ordering my bumper sticker today.

Expand full comment
Lefty Mark's avatar

“The upper crust is a bunch of crumbs held together by a lot of dough”

<i>~ Fibber McGee and Molly,</i> 1945

Expand full comment
Lefty Mark's avatar

Also too, a lot of graft and corruption is deeply ingrained into the unwritten but commonly-understood "[PRC] way of doing business."

Expand full comment
Lefty Mark's avatar

There's plenty to choose from on that buffet. It all represents the kind of boost that the country has been starved of for over 40 years.

Expand full comment
marxalot's avatar

So how did we get the other but not the one?

Expand full comment
marxalot's avatar

I'm not into organ meats, but I make a mean roast.

Expand full comment
Beautiful Black Man's avatar

Sanders is certifiably crazy.

Expand full comment
T. Scott's avatar

False. There are only two political movements: Anarchism, and Statism. One approves of the use of violence, the first does not. As nice as Bernie's plan sounds, if the rich don't pay those taxes, the government comes in and takes it by force. Anyone who has seen the IRS in action knows that if you don't comply, it is lethal force. Come up with a form of government that has no taxes and is voluntary and you don't have a government. Wait... that sounds perfect. Now all the people who want to argue with me about "but who will make sure the meat is safe?!" can now hit reply.

Expand full comment
Mike McTighe's avatar

Well gee, why not throw in a free car too, and blowjobs! That's the ticket!

Expand full comment
David Steele's avatar

There are only two political movements: Anarchism, and Statism.

False choice. From the simple minded comes the simple.

Expand full comment
David Steele's avatar

That's right. You'd have to be crazy to want to be president of a stupid country filled with stupid people.

Expand full comment
David Steele's avatar

You're not making sense. In any economic model Republicans have to pay for blowjobs. And how could workers who make a decent living wage make cars for free?

Expand full comment
Reddishrabbit's avatar

Oddly I suspect that many of this ideals would actually be popular. But why would the democratic party do that when the could try to be republicans light?

Expand full comment
Olav_Pompatus's avatar

Eating the rich? Would that dish be called Soylent Red?

Expand full comment
Zippy W. Pinhead's avatar

because those ideas would NOT be popular with the people who own the democratic politicians

Expand full comment
schmannity's avatar

Coincidentally, this is the same program that has made China the largest economy in 30 years of growth.

Expand full comment