7 Comments

"providing those two girls dresses for a sanctified marriage would break God’s law.”

The Bible has some pretty odd and creepy parts, but I'm pretty sure this ain't anywhere in it.

Expand full comment

I think the way they use it like a crutch just belies more of their never-ending problems with projection.

"Tolerance," is it now? YOU FIRST, "CHRISTIAN"

Expand full comment

<i>"These women could have easily taken their business elsewhere ..."</i>

Separate but equal, right? Let's take this out for a spin...

Those gun owners could easily have taken their business elsewhere... Those women could easily have gotten their abortion elsewhere... Those Christians could easily have shopped in a store that says "Merry Christmas"...

Expand full comment

See how "tolerant" they are? "Answering to God" means only whatever they want it to mean, at their convenience. LEARN FROM THEIR EXAMPLES GAYLIBTARD THROATRAMMSTERS!

Expand full comment

I am about to go set fire to Red Lobster, because I'm answering to God, who clearly spoke in Leviticus 11:10 "But anything in the seas or the rivers that has not fins and scales, of the swarming creatures in the waters and of the living creatures that are in the waters, is detestable to you"

DETESTABLE, GOT THAT, YOU HOUSE OF DELICOUS SIN

Expand full comment

"the owner currently “[does] not service same-sex couples.”

Service?

They want a dress, not sexual favor. Or maybe it's like a mechanic who doesn't service vehicles from a different manufacturer--or God in this case.

Expand full comment

FRC said, “When religious liberty clashes with homosexuality – as it has from bakeries to flower shops – the storylines are all the same: conform or be punished.”

Yes. That's exactly what the "Christians" are telling the gays - conform or be punished. Don't these people ever listen to themselves? Good gawd, y'all.

Expand full comment